情绪调节策略对不同心理弹性物质成瘾者干扰抑制的影响
发布时间：2019-04-28 17:38
【摘要】：为了解两种情绪调节策略(表达抑制与认知重评)对不同心理弹性物质成瘾者干扰抑制的影响,本研究以150名女子吸毒强戒人员(高弹性组80人,低弹性组70人)为被试,采用经典Stroop任务范式进行了两项实验研究。结果表明:1、在运用表达抑制调节策略进行情绪调节后,高心理弹性组被试的抑制控制能力与低心理弹性组差异显著,高心理弹性组被试的抑制控制能力显著强于低心理弹性组。2、在运用认知重评调节策略进行情绪调节后,高心理弹性组被试的抑制控制能力与低心理弹性组差异显著,高心理弹性组被试的抑制控制能力显著高于低心理弹性组。3、Stroop任务中,字义字色不一致的情况下被试得分最低,无关情况下得分稍高于不一致情况,字义字色一致情况下得分最高。4、在认知重评下,情绪启动类型对不同任务类型结果所造成的影响不同,积极情绪对抑制能力有显著提升作用,而消极的情绪唤起让被试抑制干扰能力更低。本研究结论如下:无论启动视频的性质是积极或消极,在表达抑制或认知重评的情绪调节策略下,高心理弹性高的物质成瘾者的干扰抑制能力显著强于低心理弹性的物质成瘾者。
[Abstract]:In order to understand the effects of two emotional regulation strategies (expression inhibition and cognitive reassessment) on interference inhibition of different psychoelastic substance addicts, 150 female drug abstinents (80 in high elasticity group and 70 in low elasticity group) were selected as subjects. Two experimental studies are carried out using the classical Stroop task paradigm. The results were as follows: (1) after emotion regulation with expression inhibition and regulation strategy, the inhibition and control ability of high psychoelasticity group was significantly different from that of low psychoelastic group, and there was significant difference between high psychoelastic group and low psychoelastic group. The ability of inhibition and control in the high psychoelastic group was significantly stronger than that in the low psycho-elastic group. 2. After emotional adjustment with cognitive re-evaluation adjustment strategy, the inhibition and control ability in the high psychoelastic group was significantly higher than that in the low psychoelastic group, and there was significant difference between the high psychoelastic group and the low psychoelastic group. 3. In Stroop task, the score was the lowest in the case of inconsistency of meaning and character, and slightly higher in unrelated cases than in the case of inconsistency, and the control ability of the subjects in high psychoelasticity group was significantly higher than that in low psychoelastic group. 3) in Stroop task, the score was the lowest in the case of inconsistency. The highest score was obtained in the case of word-meaning-word-color consistency. 4. Under the cognitive reassessment, the effect of emotional priming type on the results of different task types was different, and the positive emotion had a significant effect on the inhibition ability. Negative emotional arousal reduced the ability of subjects to suppress interference. The conclusions of this study are as follows: no matter whether the nature of initiating video is positive or negative, under the emotional regulation strategy of expression inhibition or cognitive reassessment, The interference inhibition ability of high psychoelastic substance addicts is significantly stronger than that of low psychoelastic substance addicts.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6
[Abstract]:In order to understand the effects of two emotional regulation strategies (expression inhibition and cognitive reassessment) on interference inhibition of different psychoelastic substance addicts, 150 female drug abstinents (80 in high elasticity group and 70 in low elasticity group) were selected as subjects. Two experimental studies are carried out using the classical Stroop task paradigm. The results were as follows: (1) after emotion regulation with expression inhibition and regulation strategy, the inhibition and control ability of high psychoelasticity group was significantly different from that of low psychoelastic group, and there was significant difference between high psychoelastic group and low psychoelastic group. The ability of inhibition and control in the high psychoelastic group was significantly stronger than that in the low psycho-elastic group. 2. After emotional adjustment with cognitive re-evaluation adjustment strategy, the inhibition and control ability in the high psychoelastic group was significantly higher than that in the low psychoelastic group, and there was significant difference between the high psychoelastic group and the low psychoelastic group. 3. In Stroop task, the score was the lowest in the case of inconsistency of meaning and character, and slightly higher in unrelated cases than in the case of inconsistency, and the control ability of the subjects in high psychoelasticity group was significantly higher than that in low psychoelastic group. 3) in Stroop task, the score was the lowest in the case of inconsistency. The highest score was obtained in the case of word-meaning-word-color consistency. 4. Under the cognitive reassessment, the effect of emotional priming type on the results of different task types was different, and the positive emotion had a significant effect on the inhibition ability. Negative emotional arousal reduced the ability of subjects to suppress interference. The conclusions of this study are as follows: no matter whether the nature of initiating video is positive or negative, under the emotional regulation strategy of expression inhibition or cognitive reassessment, The interference inhibition ability of high psychoelastic substance addicts is significantly stronger than that of low psychoelastic substance addicts.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘金鑫;张水淼;尉壮壮;于波;杨悦;李佳美;邓光辉;;心理弹性在认知情绪调节策略和军人急性应激反应中的中介作用研究[J];中国全科医学;2017年11期
2 赵伟;陈远秀;张哲;于志华;;民族院校大学生心理弹性、情绪调节及其社会适应性的关系研究[J];法制与社会;2017年07期
3 陈江婷;林梓龙;黄华;;农村教师工作压力与应对方式的关系:心理弹性的中介作用[J];肇庆学院学报;2017年01期
4 杨青;罗洁如;;外来工孤独感与认知情绪调节方式的关系[J];心理技术与应用;2017年01期
5 刘旭;刘志军;岳鹏飞;;情绪调节策略对农村中小学教师压力困扰的影响:心理资本的中介作用[J];心理研究;2016年06期
6 夏静静;刘百里;邢强;;高中生心理弹性、情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感的关系——以广州市某中学为例[J];教育测量与评价;2016年11期
7 安献丽;陈四光;;认知重评阻断条件化恐惧记忆的习得与表达——对恐惧反应的长程抑制作用[J];心理学报;2016年10期
8 王春梅;吕勇;;情绪的动机性对注意控制的影响[J];心理学探新;2016年04期
9 刘芳;丁锦红;张钦;;高、低趋近积极情绪对不同注意加工阶段的影响[J];心理学报;2016年07期
10 袁孝s，
本文编号：2467829
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2467829.html
