当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 一带一路论文 >

论地缘战略区位的主体间性——以缅甸为例

发布时间:2018-03-30 06:04

  本文选题:地缘政治 切入点:地缘战略 出处:《世界地理研究》2017年02期


【摘要】:由于大国不断的更换地缘战略楔子,缅甸在大国之间的几轮地缘战略角逐中绝对地理位置没有改变,但其地缘战略区位价值却几经变换。随着美国重返亚太、中国"一带一路"的提出,大国在缅甸的博弈更加剧烈,其地缘战略区位的价值越发突显,引发了更多国内外学者的关注,形成了一种缅甸对中国地缘战略不可替代的观点。全文通过对海权论、心脏地带论、边缘地带论、多级世界模式、大棋局等古典和现代地缘战略理论分析,得出:不同地缘战略理论强调了不同的地缘战略区位,同时地缘战略具有主体间性,区位隶属于地缘战略,进而推导出地缘战略区位具有主体间性。并以缅甸为例,通过考察分析缅甸在二战时期、冷战期间、新中国成立初期及中国崛起之后四个时期的地缘战略区位演变状况,解释了为何在大国博弈下缅甸的绝对地理位置没有改变,但地缘战略区位的价值却发生了变化,从而进一步论证了地缘战略区位具有主体间性。最后从主体间性角度对我国未来对缅甸的地缘战略抉择提出了几点建议。
[Abstract]:Due to the constant change of geo-strategic wedges among major countries, Myanmar's absolute geographical position has not changed in several rounds of geo-strategic competition among great powers, but its geo-strategic location value has changed several times. As the United States returns to the Asia-Pacific region, China's "Belt and Road" proposed that the game between the great powers in Myanmar is more intense, and the value of its geo-strategic location is becoming more prominent, which has aroused the concern of more scholars at home and abroad. Myanmar has formed an irreplaceable view of China's geo-strategy. This paper analyzes the classical and modern geostrategic theories such as sea power theory, heartland theory, marginal zone theory, multi-level world model, big chess game, etc. It is concluded that different geostrategic theories emphasize different geo-strategic location, and geostrategy has intersubjectivity, which belongs to geo-strategy, and then deduces that geo-strategic location has intersubjectivity, and takes Myanmar as an example. By investigating and analyzing the geostrategic location evolution of Myanmar in the period of World War II, during the Cold War, in the early days of the founding of New China and after the rise of China, this paper explains why the absolute geographical position of Myanmar has not changed under the game of great power. However, the value of geo-strategic location has changed, which further demonstrates the intersubjectivity of geo-strategic location. Finally, some suggestions are put forward for China's future geo-strategic choice to Myanmar from the perspective of intersubjectivity.
【作者单位】: 云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院;中国西南地缘环境与边疆发展协同创新中心;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金(41401157;41661033) 国家社科基金重大招标项目(16ZDA041)
【分类号】:K901.4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 段进军;试论冷战后美国地缘战略新特点[J];地理研究;2000年03期

2 S.B.科恩;李s,

本文编号:1684647


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ydyl/1684647.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2405e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com