“一带一路”战略下“跨界民族”概念及其逻辑连接

发布时间：2018-04-15 07:26

本文选题：“一带一路” + 跨界民族　；参考：《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：对于跨越国界而居的"同一民族群体",基于其与"周边国家的纽带作用"将成为"一带一路"战略中"不可忽视的优势存量"。然而学术界对于"跨界民族"相关概念的模糊与混用并不利于其与"一带一路"的逻辑连接。因此,有必要对跨界民族概念进行重新探讨。基于其客体指向与主体形成的不同理解,学术界围绕上述概念而展开的争论一直持续不断。对于概念的选择、使用与界定最终还是要结合研究的实际对象、具体情境与内容来确定。结合中国知网的统计分析来看,"跨国民族"这一概念的认可度是最低的。结合已有研究实际来看,大多数研究者的研究对象仍主要是毗邻国界的同一民族。在明确了跨界民族的内涵及其特征之后,才更有利于其与"一带一路"的逻辑连接。结合"一带一路"的战略要求以及战略实施来看,跨界民族概念的使用是最为契合的。它既突出了地域与人文等联通优势,又强调了其国家认同基础。
[Abstract]:For the "same ethnic group" living across national boundaries, it will become the "stock of advantages" in the strategy of "Belt and Road" based on its role as a link with the neighboring countries.However, the fuzzy and mixed use of the related concepts of "cross-border nationality" in academic circles is not conducive to its logical connection with Belt and Road.Therefore, it is necessary to re-explore the concept of cross-border nationality.Based on the different understanding of the object orientation and the subject formation, the academic debate about the above concept has been ongoing.For the choice of concepts, use and definition should be combined with the actual research object, specific situation and content to determine.According to the statistical analysis of China National Network, the concept of "transnational nation" is the lowest.According to the existing research practice, most of the research subjects are still the same ethnic group bordering the national boundaries.Only after defining the connotation and characteristics of cross-border nationalities, can it be more favorable to its logical connection with Belt and Road.In combination with Belt and Road's strategic requirements and strategic implementation, the use of the concept of cross-border nationality is most suitable.It not only highlights the advantages of region and humanities, but also emphasizes the basis of its national identity.
【作者单位】：中南民族大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“跨境民族与边疆公共事务治理”的阶段性成果(项目编号:13JJD630015)
【分类号】：D633

【相似文献】