旧制度主义:政治科学中制度研究的诸传统

发布时间：2018-01-22 00:36

本文关键词： 制度主义政治科学罗德斯主导范式英国政治西方政治 Rhodes 政治学者费边社研究协会 　出处：《上海行政学院学报》2015年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文原题为"Old Institutionalism",选自R.A.W.罗德斯(R.A.W.Rhodes)主编的《牛津政治制度手册》(The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions,The Oxford University Press,2006)第六章。罗德斯教授曾任英国政治研究协会主席,其后担任该协会终身副主席。从新旧分野的角度来看,新制度主义政治学作为当代西方政治科学的主导范式,不仅推动政治制度研究内容的更新,也极大扩展了政治制度研究领域的范围。然而,在承认新制度主义政治学具有系统化理论形式并注重研究方法的同时,对于新制度主义将传统制度研究简单概括为旧制度主义,以及将后者研究特点归纳为法律主义、结构主义、整体主义的做法,却鲜有政治学者提出批评。本文不仅质疑了政治科学中制度研究的喜新厌旧现象,还创造性地论述了寓新于旧的合理性。具体而言,罗德斯教授挖掘、梳理了政治制度研究中现代主义/经验主义、正式/法律、观念论与社会主义等四个传统,并将其与新制度主义政治学的理性选择制度主义、历史制度主义、建构论制度主义、网络制度主义四个流派分别予以联系,既丰富了对旧制度主义研究传统的深刻认识,也有助于理解以新制度主义为代表的当代英美政治科学研究的局限所在。
[Abstract]:The original title of this paper is "Old Institutionalism". Selected from the Oxford Handbook on political institutions, edited by R.A.W. Rhodesby R.A.W. Rhodes. (. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. The Oxford University Pressn (2006) Chapter 6th. Professor Rhodes was president of the British Association for political Studies. From the perspective of the separation between the new and the old, the political science of neo-institutionalism, as the dominant paradigm of contemporary western political science, not only promotes the updating of the content of political system research. However, the new institutionalism political science has a systematic theoretical form and pays attention to the research methods at the same time. For the new institutionalism, the traditional institutional research is simply summarized as the old institutionalism, and the characteristics of the latter are summed up as legalism, structuralism and holism. However, few political scholars criticize. This paper not only questions the phenomenon of "love for the new and weariness of the old" in the study of political science, but also discusses the rationality of combining the new with the old. Specifically, Professor Rhodes excavates. It combs the four traditions of modernism / empiricism, formalism / law, idealism and socialism in the study of political system, and compares them with the rational choice of institutionalism and historical institutionalism in the politics of neo-institutionalism. The four schools of constructivism institutionalism and network institutionalism are linked to each other, which enriches the profound understanding of the research tradition of the old institutionalism. It also helps to understand the limitations of contemporary British and American political science research represented by neo-institutionalism.
【作者单位】：英国南安普顿大学;纽卡斯尔大学;澳大利亚格里菲斯大学政治科学系;吉林大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“当代新制度主义政治学理论建构研究”(14CZZ036)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D08
【正文快照】： (吉林大学,长春130012)译者按:本文原题为“Old Institutionalism”,选自R.A.W.罗德斯(R.A.W.Rhodes)主编的《牛津政治制度手册》(The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions,The Oxford UniversityPress,2006)第六章。罗德斯教授曾任英国政治研究协会主席,其后担任该协

【相似文献】