中国古代晚期政治哲学刍议

发布时间：2018-02-04 06:16

本文关键词： 道统政统政治哲学　出处：《开放时代》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文以事实与价值分离的观念结构,以及以道统如何规制政统的问题意识,来作为区分中国古代晚期政治哲学的研究判准。并以明末三大儒、龚定庵、康有为及梁启超作为此哲学系统的代表。本文认为,这样一种哲学系统,与现代中国基于价值与事实合一的观念,将道统与政统结合于集权政党的思想是迥然不同,基于此,本文乃将此哲学系统分期为"古代晚期"。而本文也指出,在现代主流价值与各国特殊时势难以避免的冲突中,藉由过去已出现过的反思来参照现代是不可或缺的,因此,此哲学系统尽管与现代价值格格不入,但仍是相当值得研究的。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the concept structure of the separation of fact and value, as well as the problem consciousness of how to regulate the political system by the Taoism, is used to distinguish the study of the late political philosophy in ancient China, and the three great Confucians, Gong Dingan, in the late Ming Dynasty. Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao are the representatives of this philosophical system. This paper holds that such a philosophical system is based on the concept of integration of value and fact in modern China. The idea of combining Taoism and political unification with centralized political parties is very different. Based on this, this paper divides the philosophical system into "the late ancient period", and this article also points out. In the conflict between the modern mainstream value and the special situation of each country, it is indispensable to refer to the modern by the reflection that has appeared in the past. Therefore, this philosophical system is incompatible with the modern value. But it is still worth studying.
【作者单位】：中山大学哲学系;
【分类号】：D092
【正文快照】： □67一、前言一般认为中国现代起于鸦片战争之后,这是按照所谓的西方冲击论来做定义的,然而本文认为,这样的时代划分,并不尽然能够适用于中国历史发展的所有层面,也就是说,这样“一刀切”的方法,很有可能导致忽略一些中国固有的内部发展逻辑。尽管现在并没有让人普遍接受所谓

【参考文献】