从“诸众”到“共有者”——哈特与奈格里激进政治主体的逻辑转换及当代意义

发布时间：2018-03-14 10:42

本文选题：诸众　切入点：非物质劳动　出处：《南京社会科学》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：意大利自主论马克思主义者奈格里和哈特提出的反抗资本帝国统治的"诸众"主体理论引人注目。他们从本体论(身体潜能本体论和历史本体论)和政治性(阶级斗争和政治规划)角度论证了诸众不同于"人民"、"群众"、"工人阶级"等现代主体的内涵,指出诸众既具有革命反抗性又具有伦理建构性的双重形象;他们分析论证了非物质劳动之上对抗"生命权力"的"生命政治生产"和超越资本统治的"共有"生产形式,得出诸众具有"出离"资本关系的潜能和建构新社会的伦理要求;在反思2011年的"广场占领运动"中提出了在现实斗争中摆脱"贫乏主体性"而建立新的充盈主体性的"共有者"的形象,从而完成了诸众主体理论的逻辑。但诸众理论具有非现实的乌托邦缺陷。
[Abstract]:The theory of "mass" subjects against the domination of capital empires put forward by the Italian autonomous Marxists Negri and Hart is remarkable. They come from ontology (body potential ontology and historical ontology) and political theory (order order). From the angle of class struggle and political planning, it demonstrates the connotation of modern subjects such as "the people", "the masses", "the working class" and so on. They point out that the masses have the dual image of revolutionary resistance and ethical construction, and they analyze and demonstrate the "life political production" against "life power" and the "common" production form that transcends the rule of capital. It is concluded that all of them have the potential of capital relations and the ethical requirements of constructing a new society. In the "Square Occupy Movement" in 2011, the author puts forward the image of the "common person" who can get rid of the "poor subjectivity" and build up a new "common person" who is full of subjectivity in the realistic struggle. Thus, the logic of the theory of various subjects is completed, but the theories of the masses have unrealistic utopian defects.
【作者单位】：南京大学哲学系;安徽财经大学;
【分类号】：D0

【相似文献】