零碎的抑或总体的:杜威和罗尔斯社会治理理论比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 01:19

本文选题：杜威　切入点：罗尔斯　出处：《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年04期

【摘要】：作为美国实用主义和自由主义政治哲学的代表,杜威和罗尔斯共同关注社会基本制度的设计。受康德和黑格尔影响,杜威对统一性的追求渗透到其哲学思想的各个方面,民主社会成为其构思理想社会的最终成果。通过隐藏与导师斯退士的师生关系,罗尔斯有意抹去其思想的黑格尔因素,但他对正义原则的构想,对良序社会的安排,对万民法的追求,呼应着杜威当年的相似努力。杜威把民主融入传统社会,罗尔斯则抛弃了传统社会,使正义社会具有全新的起源。在社会改革的路径选择上,杜威沿着洛克—休谟—斯密的英美温和启蒙思想路线,选择了零碎的渐进改良路径;罗尔斯沿着霍布斯—卢梭—康德—马克思的欧洲大陆启蒙思想路线,选择了根本解决的激进变革路径。这些可给中国社会治理和政治改革带来深远启示。
[Abstract]:As the representative of American pragmatism and liberal political philosophy, Dewey and Rawls are concerned about the design of the basic social system. Influenced by Kant and Hegel, Dewey's pursuit of unity permeates all aspects of his philosophy. By hiding the teacher-student relationship with his mentor, Scholars, Rawls deliberately erased the Hegel element of his thoughts, but his conception of the principle of justice and the arrangement of a well-ordered society were the ultimate results of his idea of an ideal society. The pursuit of the law of the people echoed Dewey's similar efforts. Dewey integrated democracy into the traditional society, while Rawls abandoned the traditional society and made the just society have a new origin. Dewey chose a piecemeal path of gradual improvement along Locke Hume Smith's line of moderate enlightenment in Britain and America, while Rawls followed the European Continental Enlightenment line of Hobbes Luzo-Conde Marx. It has chosen the radical change path which can bring profound enlightenment to China's social governance and political reform.
【作者单位】：浙江大学公共管理学院;浙江大学思想政治理论科学教研部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AZX016) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(09JDDF003YB)
【分类号】：D08

【相似文献】