公共政策终结中的利益冲突与协调

发布时间：2018-04-02 03:25

本文选题：公共政策终结　切入点：利益冲突　出处：《广州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：公共政策终结是政策过程中的基本环节,在政策过程中发挥了承上启下的作用,也是政策自我调适的重要手段。但政策终结的研究却一直处于滞后阶段,这种滞后性不仅表现在对政策终结的理论研究滞后于对政策过程中其他过程的研究,也表现在理论研究严重滞后于政策终结的现实与需要。我国现正处于从传统社会转向现代社会的社会转型时期,呈现出利益主体多元化、利益取向多极化、利益矛盾尖锐化、利益差别显性化等特点。而公共政策作为政府实现社会管理职能的主要手段和方式,在协调社会利益冲突、整合社会群体利益中发挥着重要的作用。公共政策终结作为对公共政策调整或终结,是公共政策协调利益的重要环节之一,而其本身在进程中牵涉到了对利益格局的调整,存在着引起利益冲突的可能。而在我国现实的社会治理实践中,公共政策终结的形式并不规范,这就造成了政策利益冲突频发,更阻碍了公共政策协调利益功能的发挥。基于此,本文选择了从利益冲突与协调为视角对公共政策终结进行理论探讨。论文分为四大部分：第一章是绪论,在阐述选题缘由与意义、研究的文献综述、研究思路、方法、内容及其可能的创新的基础上引入课题。第二章是理论分析,对公共政策终结、利益冲突、利益协调等核心概念进行了界定,确定了政策终结中主要涉及政策终结主体、执行者以及目标对象三个利益主体,明确其所产生的利益冲突属于可协调的非对抗性冲突,强调在利益协调的过程中,要注重将个人利益协调与政府协调相结合。在此基础上,进一步论述了公共政策终结利益协调的必要性。第三章是现实分析,结合当前政策终结实践的基础上,总结了政策终结中存在着中央政府与地方政府争利、利益群体博弈阻碍政策终结决策、政策利益分配变更引发利益冲突的具体利益冲突表现,并分析了其中成因。第四章是对策探讨,以加强公共政策终结政策科学性、提高政策利益协调能力为出发点,提出了提高政策终结决策认同、建立和健全多元政策利益协调机制以及提高公民政策参与能力三个方面的具体对策。
[Abstract]:The end of public policy is the basic link in the process of policy. It plays a connecting role in the process of policy, and is also an important means of self-adjustment of policy, but the study of policy termination has been lagging behind. This lag is not only reflected in the theoretical study of policy termination lagging behind the study of other processes in the policy process. China is now in a period of social transformation from traditional society to modern society, showing the diversification of interest subjects, multi-polarization of interest orientation, sharp contradiction of interests, and the fact that theoretical research is seriously lagging behind the reality and needs of the end of the policy, and that China is now in a period of social transformation from a traditional society to a modern society. As the main means and ways for the government to realize the function of social management, the public policy coordinates the conflict of social interests. Integration of the interests of social groups plays an important role. As an adjustment or end of public policy, the end of public policy is one of the important links of coordinating the interests of public policies, and it itself involves the adjustment of the pattern of interests in the process. There is a possibility of conflict of interest. However, in the practice of social governance in our country, the form of the end of public policy is not standardized, which results in frequent conflicts of interest in policy. Based on this, this paper chooses to discuss the end of public policy from the angle of conflict of interest and coordination. The thesis is divided into four parts: the first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the topic on the basis of explaining the reason and significance of the topic, literature review, research ideas, methods, contents and possible innovations. This paper defines the core concepts of public policy termination, conflict of interest, interest coordination and so on, and determines that the policy termination mainly involves the subject of policy termination, the executor and the target object. It is clear that the conflicts of interest that result from them are non-confrontational conflicts that can be coordinated. It is emphasized that in the process of interest coordination, we should pay attention to combining the coordination of individual interests with the coordination of the government. On this basis, The third chapter is the realistic analysis, combined with the practice of the current policy termination, summarizes the existence of the central government and local governments competing for interests in the end of the policy. The game of interest groups hinders the final policy decision, and the change of policy interests causes the conflict of interest, and analyzes the causes of the conflict. Chapter four discusses the countermeasures to strengthen the scientific nature of the public policy. Based on improving the ability of policy interest coordination, this paper puts forward three concrete countermeasures, which are to improve the policy final decision recognition, to establish and perfect the multi-policy interest coordination mechanism, and to improve the citizen's policy participation ability.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D035

【参考文献】