现代共和思想的时间意识:以波考克和阿伦特为例

发布时间：2018-04-21 12:02

本文选题：时间意识 + 公民人文主义　；参考：《学术月刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：作为当代共和主义复兴的代表人物,阿伦特和波考克的共和主张来自现象学和史学建构的不同背景。但在他们不同的理论诠释背后,隐含着对政治近似的本体论假定和时间想象。藉由波考克的公民人文主义话语,这种时间想象得以揭示,他把共和主义解释为现代早期与基督教神圣时间相抗衡的政治模式。而阿伦特的共和主义则试图以"开端时间"来抵御现代的"过程时间",并以开端的自我奠基来解决共和国的持久性问题。他们两人对时间性的共同关注,表明他们都反对把现代视为一种无休止的进步过程,或围绕着对"物的管理"展开的均质流动的时间。对他们来说,共和国体现了人以行动开辟空间来克服时间的努力,对政治的热情乃是出于人类在真正意义的世俗王国中寻求不朽的渴望。同时,他们关于共和主义的时间模式仍有差别,这种差别解释了他们对美国革命的不同态度。
[Abstract]:As the representative figures of the contemporary republicanism revival, Arendt and Polcock's Republican ideas come from different backgrounds of phenomenological and historical construction. But behind their different interpretations, there are ontological assumptions and temporal imaginations of political approximation. Through his civil humanist discourse, this time imagination reveals that he interpreted republicanism as a political model that competed with the Christian holy time in the early modern times. Arendt's republicanism, on the other hand, tries to resist modern "process time" with "beginning time" and to solve the persistent problem of republic with the self-foundation of beginning. Their common concern for timeliness indicates that they are both opposed to viewing modernity as an endless process of progress or a homogeneous flow of time around the "management of things". For them, the Republic embodies man's efforts to open up space by action to overcome time, and his enthusiasm for politics stems from the human desire to seek immortality in a secular kingdom of true meaning. At the same time, there are still differences in their time patterns about republicanism, which explain their different attitudes towards the American Revolution.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学哲学系;
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】