近代西方正义理论视阈下儒家“义”德的政治哲学解读

发布时间：2018-07-01 09:36

本文选题：儒家 + 义　；参考：《黑龙江社会科学》2014年03期

【摘要】：儒学"五常""四端"说,皆以"义"为核心范畴之一。"正义"自古以来就是西方道德哲学和政治哲学的核心议题。正义表现为关涉个人与个人之间,个人与群体交往关系之间的一种美德;同时也是实现社会公正与和谐秩序的原则、规范和体制。儒学讲"内圣外王",大体而言,"内圣"是道德哲学的谱系;"外王"则是政治哲学。就儒学"内圣"体系、内圣开外王的路径而言,"义"是"仁"的道德实践;而就儒学"外王"体系而言,"义"表征为"仪",即"礼",人行"义"而"仪",以实现和维持和谐公正的社会秩序,主要表现为对社会正义的遵行和对非正义行为的规诫和惩罚,即矫正正义的实施。"义"作为正义的原则,该原则自身是否合乎正义?儒家性善论和儒家天命论为此提供了合法性证明。
[Abstract]:Confucianism's "five permanent" and "four ends" are all based on "righteousness" as one of the core categories. " Justice has been the core topic of western moral philosophy and political philosophy since ancient times. Justice is a virtue concerning the relationship between individuals and individuals, and it is also the principle, norm and system of realizing social justice and harmonious order. Confucianism talks about "internal saints and foreign kings", generally speaking, "inner saints" is a pedigree of moral philosophy, while "outside kings" is political philosophy. As far as the Confucian system of "inner sanctity" and the path of "inner and holy" king are concerned, "righteousness" is the moral practice of "benevolence"; As far as the "outside king" system of Confucianism is concerned, "righteousness" is characterized by "ceremony", "propriety", "righteousness" and "instrument", in order to realize and maintain a harmonious and just social order, which is mainly manifested in following the social justice and admonishing and punishing the unjust behavior. That is, the implementation of corrective justice. " As the principle of justice, does the principle of righteousness itself conform to justice? The Confucian theory of goodness of nature and Confucian theory of destiny provide proof of legitimacy.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学人文学院;
【分类号】：D09;B222

【共引文献】