霸权、对话与解放——考克斯和林克莱特国际批判理论比较

发布时间：2018-10-30 08:17

【摘要】：罗伯特·考克斯与安德鲁·林克莱特分别是国际批判理论内部两个主要流派的领军人物。考克斯借鉴葛兰西的"霸权"理论,林克莱特吸收体现于哈贝马斯的交往行动理论和埃利亚斯的"过程社会学"中的"对话"观点,分别构建了自己的理论体系,在不同的方向上发展了国际批判理论。两位学者在理论渊源、对主流理论的批判、国际体系的结构变迁和实现人类解放的前景等问题的看法上有某些共通之处,同时存在不可忽视的差异。这也反映了国际批判理论内部两个主要流派之间不同的研究旨趣。两位学者对于文明问题的共同兴趣也意味两个流派之间可以进行有意义的对话。
[Abstract]:Robert Cox and Andrew Linklater are two main schools of international critical theory. Cox draws lessons from Gramsci's "hegemony" theory, Linklater absorbs the views of "dialogue" embodied in Habermas's theory of communication action and Elyas's "sociology of process", and constructs his own theoretical system, respectively. International critical theory has been developed in different directions. The two scholars have some common views on the theoretical origin, criticism of the mainstream theories, the structural changes of the international system and the prospect of the realization of human liberation, and there are some differences that can not be ignored at the same time. This also reflects the different research purport between the two main schools of international critical theory. The common interest of the two scholars in the issue of civilization also means a meaningful dialogue between the two schools.
【作者单位】：南京大学政府管理学院;
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】