合法性理论及其意义——韦伯与哈贝马斯的比较
发布时间：2018-11-12 09:52
【摘要】：合法性理论是政治学理论的一个重要组成部分,和国家政治生活有着密不可分的关系。研究合法性理论本身就是研究国家政权成败、兴衰的政治现象的理论。自从人类社会出现国家、进入政治社会以来,人们也就开始了对政治合法性问题的思考。韦伯明确提出合法性概念以后,合法性问题受到广泛关注,社会学和法学学者开始大量讨论合法性问题。哈贝马斯在怀疑韦伯的合法性理论的基础之上,建立了自己的理论体系。本文旨在梳理韦伯与哈贝马斯的合法性理论的内容与演变过程,并对其理论价值提出些许浅见,以飨读者。
[Abstract]:Legitimacy theory is an important part of political science theory and has a close relationship with national political life. To study the theory of legitimacy is to study the political phenomenon of the success or failure of the state power, the rise and fall of the political phenomenon. Since the emergence of a country and a political society, people have begun to think about the issue of political legitimacy. After Weber put forward the concept of legality, the issue of legality was paid more and more attention, and scholars of sociology and law began to discuss the issue of legality. Habermas established his own theoretical system on the basis of doubting Weber's theory of legitimacy. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the content and evolution of Weber's and Habermas's theory of legitimacy, and to offer some views on its theoretical value.
【作者单位】： 南京审计大学;湘潭大学法学院;
【分类号】：D091
本文编号：2326765
[Abstract]:Legitimacy theory is an important part of political science theory and has a close relationship with national political life. To study the theory of legitimacy is to study the political phenomenon of the success or failure of the state power, the rise and fall of the political phenomenon. Since the emergence of a country and a political society, people have begun to think about the issue of political legitimacy. After Weber put forward the concept of legality, the issue of legality was paid more and more attention, and scholars of sociology and law began to discuss the issue of legality. Habermas established his own theoretical system on the basis of doubting Weber's theory of legitimacy. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the content and evolution of Weber's and Habermas's theory of legitimacy, and to offer some views on its theoretical value.
【作者单位】： 南京审计大学;湘潭大学法学院;
【分类号】：D091
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王西阁;;西方合法性理论的主要流派及其渊源[J];湖北职业技术学院学报;2006年01期
2 郭晓东;;规范主义合法性理论的衰落与重建[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年03期
3 刘红卿;洛克《政府论两篇》中两种政府合法性理论的对比分析[J];河南社会科学;2001年01期
4 郝宇青;;论合法性理论之流变[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年05期
5 马良怀;;秦汉之际皇权合法性理论的探寻与建构[J];哲学研究;2012年01期
6 王海成;;从武王伐纣到《大义觉迷录》——中国古代的“合法性”理论及其特点[J];人文杂志;2012年03期
7 田方林;;合法性论证及其中国化演绎[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年06期
8 郭晓东;多元价值反思中的西方合法性理论[J];天津社会科学;2005年02期
9 伍俊斌;;论西方政治合法性理论的基本类型[J];黑龙江社会科学;2011年01期
10 陈炳辉;试析哈贝马斯的重建性的合法性理论——兼与胡伟同志商榷[J];政治学研究;1998年02期
，本文编号：2326765
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2326765.html
