正义社会的稳定性问题

发布时间：2018-12-13 10:44

【摘要】：正义社会的稳定性问题是罗尔斯正义理论中的重大问题,也是使得罗尔斯从《正义论》中的整全性学说向政治自由主义转向的关键所在。对于政治稳定性问题,罗尔斯在《正义论》与《政治自由主义》中,前后提出了两种关于稳定性的论证。在《正义论》中,罗尔斯从道德的稳定性即正义感这一维度进行了充分论证,认为以公平正义原则为核心的社会基本结构能够得到道德心理学意义上的正义感的稳定支持;然而,当他意识到现代民主社会理性多元的事实之后,在继续坚持道德正义感作为正义社会正义原则的稳定性必要条件之外,提出和论证了重叠共识作为正义社会稳定性支持的关键因素之一。他认为重叠共识并非是临时协议,以公平正义原则为核心的重叠共识能够是稳定而持久的,从而完成了他的正义理论的论证。
[Abstract]:The stability of the just society is an important problem in Rawls' theory of justice and the key to turn Rawls from the theory of integrity in the Theory of Justice to political liberalism. As for political stability, Rawls put forward two kinds of argumentation about stability in Justice and political Liberalism. In the Theory of Justice, Rawls makes a full argument from the dimension of moral stability, that is, the sense of justice, and holds that the social basic structure with the principle of fairness and justice as the core can be supported by the sense of justice in the sense of moral psychology. However, when he realized the fact that modern democratic society was rational and pluralistic, he continued to insist on moral justice as a necessary condition for the stability of the principles of justice in a just society. The overlapping consensus is proposed and demonstrated as one of the key factors to support the stability of a just society. He holds that the overlapping consensus is not a temporary agreement, and the overlapping consensus with the principle of fairness and justice as the core can be stable and lasting, thus completing the demonstration of his theory of justice.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学哲学院政治哲学研究中心;中国人民大学国际中国哲学与比较哲学研究中心;
【分类号】：D0

【相似文献】