晋宋“神不灭”思想与印度佛教业报轮回思想的比较

发布时间：2018-01-03 00:05

本文关键词：晋宋“神不灭”思想与印度佛教业报轮回思想的比较　出处：《吉林大学》2005年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中土的“神不灭”思想由来已久,形神问题也是中国古代思想界相当重视和不断讨论的问题之一。印度佛教业报轮回思想的东传更为形神问题的讨论提供了新的意义。自释迦牟尼将业报轮回思想引入佛教以来,业报轮回的主体就一直是模糊的。早期佛教强调没有“我”的真实存在,而业报轮回说又偏偏需要一个承载业报的主体。这成为原始佛教理论的一大矛盾。业报轮回说初入中土,与中土传统的灵魂不灭、善恶报应思想相结合,产生了广泛的影响。但对于佛教与反佛教的争论来说,轮回主体的有无仍是轮回思想是否成立的关键所在。针对这一问题的讨论,使得中土传统的形神问题衍变成了神灭与神不灭之争。本文拟将晋宋形神之争中的“神不灭”思想与印度佛教的业报轮回说做以比较,来探讨二者之间的异同关联。
[Abstract]:The thought of "God does not destroy" in China has a long history. The question of form and spirit is also one of the issues that the ancient Chinese ideological circles attach great importance to and discuss constantly. The discussion of the eastward spread of the thought of Indian Buddhist newspaper reincarnation provides a new meaning for the discussion of the question of form and spirit. Since the introduction of Buddhism. The subject of karma samsara has always been vague. Early Buddhism stressed that there is no "I" real existence. However, the theory of karma reincarnation also needs a main body to carry the karma. This has become a major contradiction in the theory of primitive Buddhism. The theory of karma reincarnation first entered the land of China, which combined with the traditional soul of China and the thought of retribution of good and evil. But for the debate between Buddhism and anti-Buddhism, the existence of reincarnation is still the key to the establishment of reincarnation. The traditional problem of form and deity in China has evolved into a dispute between deity and deity. This article intends to compare the thought of "deity inextinguishment" in the struggle between Jin and Song dynasties with the samsara theory of Indian Buddhism. To explore the similarities and differences between the two.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：B949.2

【引证文献】