禅宗与后现代主义的异质同构性

发布时间：2018-05-13 06:51

本文选题：后现代主义思潮 + 禅的精神　；参考：《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》2014年03期

【摘要】：人类文化精神的发展就是不断突破并摧毁现存观念的过程。哲学和文化精神的创新往往表现为反传统、反权威、反规则的思维方式上的变革。任何创新性的哲学和文化思潮都具有这一品性。在此意义上,可以发现古代中国禅宗哲学与20世纪西方后现代主义哲学与文化思潮具有同构性。禅宗哲学和后现代哲学都标举反传统、反规则、反权威的旗帜,大胆颠覆传统的逻辑思维方式,亵渎传统的文化信念,挑战传统的文化思想规范,表现出强烈的批判性、反叛性、破坏性。这表明,禅宗哲学与后现代哲学在解构性的思维方式上,在摧毁现存精神世界的策略上都具有同构性。后现代主义和禅都反对理论的概念化、体系化;都把人类思想体系的成果"碎片化"、"断片化"。如果人类精神思想都变成一盘散沙,后现代主义自身也终将走向没落。后现代主义思潮同禅宗思想有一种共同的暗合的宿命:解构者终究消解自身!
[Abstract]:The development of human cultural spirit is the process of breaking through and destroying existing concepts. The innovation of philosophy and cultural spirit is often reflected in the change of thinking mode of anti-tradition, anti-authority and anti-rule. Any innovative philosophical and cultural trend of thought has this character. In this sense, it can be found that the ancient Chinese Zen philosophy has the same structure with the 20th century western postmodernism philosophy and cultural trend. Both Zen philosophy and postmodern philosophy hold the banner of anti-tradition, anti-rule, anti-authority, boldly subvert the traditional logical thinking mode, blaspheme the traditional cultural belief, challenge the norms of traditional cultural thought, and show strong criticism. Rebellious, destructive. This shows that both Zen philosophy and postmodern philosophy have isomorphism in deconstruction and in the strategy of destroying the existing spiritual world. Both postmodernism and Zen oppose the conceptualization and systematization of theory, and "fragmentation" of the achievements of human thought system. If human spiritual thoughts become scattered, post-modernism itself will eventually decline. Postmodernism and Zen thought have a common destiny: the deconstructor eventually dissolves himself!
【作者单位】：华中师范大学文学院;琼州学院艺术学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJA751048)
【分类号】：B946.5

【共引文献】