关于破山禅派与聚云法派僧诤的再探讨

发布时间：2018-06-25 05:00

本文选题：破山禅派 + 聚云法派　；参考：《宗教学研究》2015年04期

【摘要】：学术界对破山禅派与聚云法派之间的僧诤所作的探讨存在不少误区。结合双方的言论来看,破山海明对吹万广真的"从上古人单教人明心见性"、"明眼行道者妄行棒喝"等禅学观点的批判是误解了吹万广真的真实意图。破山海明及其法嗣山晖行涣对聚云法派传承问题的驳斥则反映出两派在法派诤议中的不同立场,破山禅派是以面禀亲承为原则,辟聚云法派传承之妄。聚云法派主张以心心相印,反对专务源流的形式主义做法。聚云法派没有因两派僧诤而迅速走衰,它在清代康乾时期的浙江地区相当繁盛。
[Abstract]:There are many misunderstandings in the discussion of the monk Zheng between the Zen School of the broken Mountain and the School of Juyun Law. According to the opinions of both sides, Zhu Shanhaiming's criticism of the Zen viewpoints such as "only teaching people to see the heart from the upper ancients" and "the bright eyes and the Taoists walking the stick and drinking" is a misunderstanding of the true intention of blowing Wan Kwong. Dushanhaiming and Fashishan Huihuan refute the inheritance of Juyun Dafa School, which reflects the different positions of the two schools in the debate of the Dharma School. The Dushan Zen School is based on the principle of "bearing on one's face" and passing on the inheritance of the "Juyun" Dharma School. The Juyun Fa-school advocated to agree with each other and oppose the formalism of the origin of special affairs. Juyun Dharma did not decline rapidly because of the two schools of monks. It flourished in Zhejiang during the Kangqian period of the Qing Dynasty.
【作者单位】：吉首大学哲学研究所;
【分类号】：B948

【相似文献】