An Integrated Approach for Social Sustainable Supplier Evalu

发布时间：2021-08-30 10:14

　　组织和管理决策正受到企业可持续发展压力的影响。若组织的目标是实现可持续性,则组织需要在决策时考虑经济、环境和社会等方面的可持续性发展。供应链决策在组织商品和服务产出的整体可持续性中发挥着独特而关键的作用。虽然许多学者和从业者已经对经济和环境的可持续性进行研究,但社会的可持续性在科研和实践中受到的关注较少,特别是在发展中国家和新兴经济体。社会可持续性对其他可持续性举措具有促进作用,若忽视这一方面可能会对整条供应链产生严重的负面影响。为解决这一问题,本文提出了制造企业供应链社会可持续性的研究框架。为了说明拟议框架的适用性和有效性,本文采用多标准决策方法“最差最佳方法”（BWM）并通过38名专家的样本评估社会可持续性标准并确定其优先顺序,标准顺序是根据BWM获得的权重确定的。研究结果显示,受访者认为“合同利益相关者影响”是最重要的社会可持续性标准。可持续的供应商选择是促进供应链可持续性的一个重要决策,它可以极大地影响供应链的可持续性。在此背景下,一些学者对经济和环境的可持续性研究较多,而对社会可持续性方面的调查则相对较少。基于此,本文介绍了一种基于灰色的多标准决策支持工具,该工具由“最差最佳... 

【文章来源】：大连理工大学辽宁省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：150 页

【学位级别】：博士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Problem Description
    1.3 Research Questions
    1.4 Research Objectives
    1.5 Main Research Contributions
        1.5.1 Proposed Supply Chain Social Sustainability Evaluation Framework
        1.5.2 Proposed MCDM Method to Analysis the Social Sustainability
        1.5.3 Proposed Novel Hybrid Decision Support Tool
    1.6 Significance of Study
    1.7 Structure of the Dissertation
2 Literature Review
    2.1 Overview
    2.2 Supply Chain Management (SCM)
        2.2.1 Supplier Selection
        2.2.2 Economic Criteria for SCM Evaluation
    2.3 Sustainability
    2.4 Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM)
        2.4.1 Sustainability Supplier Selection
    2.5 Green Supply Chain Management and Green Supplier Selection
        2.5.1 Environmental Sustainability Criteria for GSCM Evaluation
    2.6 Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for SSCM Evaluation
        2.6.1 Sustainable Supplier Evaluation and Selection Decision Models
        2.6.2 Grey BWM-TODIM Justification
    2.7 Research Gap
    2.8 Summary
3 Research Design and Methodology
    3.1 Overview
    3.2 Research Design
    3.3 Population of the Study
    3.4 Interval Grey Number
    3.5 Best Worst Method (BWM)
    3.6 The TODIM Method
    3.7 Data Collection
    3.8 Summary
4 Proposed Supply Chain Social Sustainability Evaluation Framework
    4.1 Overview
    4.2 Social Sustainability in Supply Chains
    4.3 Social Sustainability Criteria
    4.4 Social Sustainability Evaluation Framework Development
        4.4.1. Work health and safety (WSLH/SSC1)
        4.4.2. Training education and community influence (TECI/SSC2)
        4.4.3. Contractual stakeholders' influence (CSI/SSC3)
        4.4.4. Occupational health and safety management system (OHSMS/SSC4)
        4.4.5. The interests and rights of employees (IRE/SSC5)
        4.4.6. The rights of stakeholders (RS/SSC6)
        4.4.7. Information disclosure (ID/SSC7)
        4.4.8. Employment practices (EP/SSC8)
    4.5 Summary
5 Case Application Analysis and Results
    5.1 Overview
    5.2 Manufacturing Industry and Social Sustainability in Iran
    5.3 Applying BWM for Assessing the Social Sustainability Criteria
    5.4 Social Sustainable Supplier Selection using Novel Grey BWM-TODIM
        5.4.1 Sensitivity Analysis for the Social Sustainable Supplier Selection
    5.5 Discussion of the Results
    5.6 Summary
6 Conclusion and Future Research Direction
    6.1 Overview
    6.2 Conclusion
    6.3 General Contributions of the Dissertation
    6.4 Limitations and Possible Future Works
    6.5 General Summary
Abstract of Innovation Points
References
Appendices
    Appendix A
    Appendix B
    Appendix C
Published Academic Theses during PhD Period
Acknowledgement
About the Author



本文编号：3372591