身份进化、污名管理与国际资本规范：韩国资本账户政策研究

发布时间：2018-01-12 12:24

本文关键词：身份进化、污名管理与国际资本规范：韩国资本账户政策研究　出处：《外交学院》2016年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本论文研究的核心问题是:国家身份与规范变迁如何影响一国资本账户政策选择。在1997-1998年和2008-2012年两次金融危机期间,国际资本自由流动的正统规范与韩国国家的经济利益同时存在不一致的情况。1997-1998年金融危机期间,韩国选择接受并遵守国际资本规范,加快实施资本账户开放政策,而在2008年全球金融危机爆发后,违背了国际资本规范实施了临时的资本管制政策。是什么因素促使韩国在前一次金融危机期间接受国际资本规范,加快实施资本账户开放政策,而在后一次金融危机期间偏离国际资本规范,实施临时性的资本管制政策,并主动塑造国际资本规范?1970年代以来,随着国际资本流动程度的提高,发达国家和新兴市场经济体先后实施资本账户开放政策。国际经济学界和国际政治经济学界对于资本账户政策的选择理论主要有四种:资本账户政策的成本与收益理论,国际资本结构假说,国内政治理论和规范传播理论。四种理论分别从理性选择、体系结构、国内结构与规范结构四个关键变量来为国家资本账户政策提供了有价值的解释。但是对于两次韩国资本账户政策选择而言,四种理论给出的因变量难以给出更为合理解释。针对以上理论的不足,本文试图通过身份进化与污名管理的视角来弥补规范传播理论解释对韩国两次资本账户政策选择的不同给予解释。在世界经济体系之中,国家对于“中心-边缘”,“国家-市场”关系认识的不同形成三种国家身份:民族主义国家身份、国家主义国家身份、自由主义国家身份。国家身份选择受国际社会共有观念和知识结构影响,国家身份处于进化和变迁之中。国家身份不仅受到适当性的规范制约和塑造,还受到污名的制约。当国家利益与国际规范相违背,国家的行为选择可能产生污名。国家污名管理策略有三种:污名接受、污名拒绝与污名化反抗。当边缘国家处于身份进化阶段,国家身份追求强烈,希望重塑自由主义国家身份,国家的利益也因此而改变。因此,国家选择接受污名,接受并遵守国际资本规范,实施资本账户开放政策。当国家已获得自由主义国家身份,边缘国家为维护国家利益,选择违背国际规范实施资本管制政策。在国际规范约束力较强的情况下,边缘国家为减少污名化带来的损失,国家可以通过适当的言语叙述来操控国内和国际金融市场的话语,引导和影响市场行为体对本国经济的正面预期和展望。当国家获得自由主义国家身份,与此同时国际规范处于退化阶段,边缘国家可以通过在国际金融治理机制的议程设置和“话语框定”、“话语链接”等策略达到塑造新规范的目的,进而使得自身的行为和政策合法化。
[Abstract]:The core problem of this thesis is how the changes of national identity and norms affect a country's capital account policy choices. During the 1997-1998 and 2008-2012 financial crises. The orthodox norms of the free flow of international capital are inconsistent with the economic interests of the Korean country. During the 1997-1998 financial crisis, Korea chose to accept and abide by the international capital norms. Accelerate the implementation of capital account opening policy, and in 2008 after the global financial crisis. What prompted Korea to accept international capital regulation during the previous financial crisis and accelerate the implementation of capital account opening policy. In the last financial crisis, deviate from the international capital norms, implement temporary capital control policies, and actively shape the international capital norms? Since the 1970s, the level of international capital flows has increased. Developed countries and emerging market economies have implemented capital account opening policies successively. There are four kinds of theories about the choice of capital account policies among international economists and international political and economic circles. The cost and income theory of capital account policy. International capital structure hypothesis, domestic political theory and normative communication theory. Four theories from rational choice, system structure respectively. The four key variables of domestic structure and normative structure provide a valuable explanation for the national capital account policy, but for the choice of capital account policy in Korea twice. It is difficult to give a more reasonable explanation for the dependent variables given by the four theories. This paper attempts to make up for the different interpretations of the two capital account policy choices in Korea from the perspective of identity evolution and stigma management in the world economic system. There are three kinds of national identities: nationalistic national identity and nationalistic national identity. The liberal state identity. The choice of national identity is influenced by the common concept and knowledge structure of the international community, and the national identity is in the process of evolution and change. The national identity is not only restricted and shaped by proper norms. It is also restricted by stigma. When the national interests and international norms are violated, the choice of national behavior may lead to stigma. There are three national stigma management strategies: stigma acceptance. When the marginal countries are in the stage of identity evolution, the pursuit of national identity is strong, hoping to reshape the liberal national identity, and the interests of the state also change as a result. Countries choose to accept stigma, accept and abide by international capital norms, and implement capital account opening policies. Choose to implement capital control policy in violation of international norms. In the case of strong binding force of international norms, marginal countries to reduce the loss of stigma. States can manipulate the discourse of domestic and international financial markets through appropriate narrative, and guide and influence market actors' positive expectations and prospects of their own economies. At the same time, the international norms are in the stage of degradation, and the marginal countries can achieve the purpose of shaping the new norms by setting the agenda of the international financial governance mechanism, "discourse framing", "discourse linking" and so on. And thus legitimize their own actions and policies.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：F833.126

【相似文献】