苏世屏《金匮要略原文真义》的学术思想研究
发布时间:2018-05-10 10:55
本文选题:苏世屏 + 金匮要略原文真义 ; 参考:《广州中医药大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:苏世屏是近现代岭南崇尚仲景学术的一名伤寒派医家,其著作《金匮要略原文真义》撰写于公元1955年12月,共四卷,是对仲景学术研究的代表作之一。苏世屏注释《金匮要略》采用逐节串注的方式,其体例完善,结构严谨,注论以《内经》、《难经》、《神农本草经》、《伤寒论》、《备急千金要方》、《诸病源候论》等经典医籍为依据,参以己见,以阐发《金匮》原旨。但由于该书近期才由其弟子方恩泽整理出版,当代岭南医家对此书闻之甚少,对苏世屏其人亦是不甚了解,故本文对《金匮要略原文真义》学术思想及其作者苏世屏的生平信息进行整理研究,使之为当代岭南仲景学说研究提供学术借鉴。本文从三个部分进行研究:第一部分为苏世屏生平事迹。介绍了苏世屏的生平、行医著书经历、从事的中医教育活动以及著书简介。第二部分为苏世屏《金匮要略原文真义》的体例结构及注释特点。本书是以陈修园《金匮要略浅注》为蓝本而著,故本部分将从新增的内容、删去的内容以及编次体例的变化等三个方面进行对比,阐述二者体例结构的不同。该书以"串注"为基本特色,善用对比,纠注家之误,考据严谨,表现出了一定的注释特点。第三部分为苏世屏《金匮要略原文真义》的学术思想。主要概括为以下几点:1、《金匮要略原文真义》的学术传承:通过对本书的研究,认识到苏世屏的《金匮要略原文真义》应归属于尊旨医经派,其尊经思想占据全书主导。不仅表现在苏氏本人对古人治学之敬仰,书中大量引用经文的注释方式,亦可明其崇尚经典。2、论《金匮》与《伤寒》存有虚邪与正邪之异:《金匮》皆论杂病为虚邪伤形而《伤寒》则为正邪伤气的观点是苏世屏对仲景学术认识的独到之处。认为《伤寒》是以三阴三阳之经气为基础,其病是由正邪实风损伤人之经气所致,具有一定的一致性,故统称三阴三阳之为病;《金匮》则是以有形之体质为基础,其病由虚邪贼风损伤人之身形所致,病源复杂。苏世屏的这一认识为理解《金匮》与《伤寒》之不同从系统上厘清了头绪。3、推崇六气标本中气之说:在苏世屏《金匮要略原文真义》中,亦可看出其对六气标本中气学说之推崇。本文通过论述苏世屏对六气标本中气本质的认识,探讨了苏世屏如何运用六气标本中气之说阐释疾病的因、证、脉、治。4、强调脉法遵古,脉证合勘:详细阐述了古人脉诊之法,认为仲师论脉皆遍诊寸口趺阳少阴,且各穴独立,部署分明,为研究仲景脉学提供了参考。同时,注重脉证合勘,提出治病必须凭证认脉,并在此基础上,或舍证从脉,或舍脉从证,以此准确审察疾病之真假虚实。5、注解经方独树一帜,处方用药谨遵成法:苏世屏注解经方,善从多角度进行全面解析,其对经方的理解,亦有不同于其他注家的地方。此外,苏氏处方用药严格,尤其是对经方的运用,主张谨遵仲师之成法,以少加减为宜。6、悟仲景言外之旨,举一反三论病:苏世屏对《金匮》为全文注释,但在注释过程中却并未仅就经文本身而注,其常悟仲景言外之旨,以举一反三之法阐发仲景之本义。结论:《金匮要略原文真义》以经典为依据,以阐发仲景原义为其旨,加之独到见解,对《金匮要略》作了系统地诠释。全书以"串注""为特点,直贯全论。书中所体现的学术思想与历代《金匮要略》注家有所不同,是一部重要的研究仲景杂病学术的文献专著。
[Abstract]:Su Shiping is a typhoid school who advocates Zhongjing academic in modern South of the Five Ridges. His book, "the original meaning of the Golden Chamber" was written in December 1955, a total of four volumes. It is one of the representative works of Zhong Jing's academic research. "Shen Nong Jing Jing", < typhoid theory >, "to prepare for a thousand gold", "the origin of the disease" and other classic medical books, and other classic medical books, to elucidate the original purpose of the "Golden Chamber", but because the book was recently compiled by his disciple Fang Enze, the contemporary south of the Five Ridges doctors heard little about this book and did not know much about Su Shiping, so this article is true to the text of the golden chamber. The academic thought and his author Su Shiping's life information were collated and studied to provide academic reference for the study of the contemporary south of the Five Ridges Zhongjing theory. This article studies from three parts: the first part is Su Shiping's life story. It introduces the life of Su Shiping, the experience of writing books, the educational activities of traditional Chinese medicine and the introduction of books. Second This part of the book is based on the three aspects of the new content, the content of the deletion and the changes of the composition, and the difference in the structure of the two cases. The book is based on "string injection" as the basic special. The third part is the academic thought of "the original meaning of the Golden Chamber". The main summary is the following points: 1, the academic inheritance of the original meaning of the text of the Golden Chamber: through the study of this book, it is recognized that Su Shiping's "the original meaning of the golden chamber of the Golden Chamber" should be assigned. With respect to the Confucian classics, he respected the Confucian classics to dominate the book, not only in the admiration of the ancient people, but also in a large number of references to the annotations of the Scriptures, as well as in the classical.2, and on the differences between the golden chamber and the typhoid. Su Shiping was unique in Zhong Jing's academic understanding. It was thought that "typhoid" was based on the three yin and three Yang's meridian qi. The disease was caused by the damage of the positive and evil spirit, which had certain consistency. Therefore, it was called the disease of three yin and three yang; "the Golden Chamber" was based on the physical constitution, and its disease was caused by the body shape of the false evil thieves, and the disease was recovered. This understanding of Su Shi screen has made a clear understanding of the difference between "Golden Chamber" and "typhoid" from the system of ".3", and praised the theory of "Qi" in the six gas specimen: in Su Shi Ping "the original meaning of the Golden Chamber", it can also be seen in the worship of the Qi theory of the six gas specimens. This article discusses Su Shiping's understanding of the essence of gas in the six gas specimens, and discusses the Soviet Union. How to explain the cause, syndrome, pulse and.4 of the disease by means of the theory of "Qi" in the six gas samples, emphasizing the pulse method to follow the ancient times and the exploration of pulse syndrome, this paper expounds the pulse diagnosis method of the ancient people in detail. On this basis, and on this basis, or giving evidence from the pulse, or giving the pulse from the evidence, to examine the true and false.5 of the disease, the prescription of the prescription is unique, the prescription medication should follow the law: Su Shi Ping annotates the classics, good from many angles, and the understanding of the Confucian classics is different from the other places. In addition, the Su prescription is strict. Especially for the use of the Confucian classics, it is advocated to comply with the law of Zhong Shi, to reduce and subtract as appropriate.6, to realize the theme of "anti three theory", and to give an annotation to the full text of "the Golden Chamber", but in the process of the annotation, he did not only note the text itself, and it often explained the original meaning of Zhong Jing by the law of Su Shiping. Hara Bunmagi, on the basis of classic, to elucidate the meaning of Zhong Jing Yuan as its purport and his unique opinion, systematically interprets the outline of the golden chamber. The book is characterized by "string injection", and the academic thought embodied in the book is different from that of the Golden Chamber of the past dynasties. It is an important literature monograph on the study of Zhongjing miscellaneous disease.
【学位授予单位】:广州中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R222
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 成晓玉;杨东方;;曹颖甫对《金匮要略》的阐释发微[J];吉林中医药;2016年01期
2 周易;傅延龄;;余无言辨治奔豚病[J];安徽中医药大学学报;2014年04期
3 李楠;高飞;;曹颖甫治学方法与学术思想探讨[J];中国中医基础医学杂志;2013年01期
4 任宏丽;段逸山;;民国期刊《中国医学月刊》研究[J];辽宁中医药大学学报;2012年12期
5 王新佩;王庆国;;《金匮要略》注家沿革与学派探讨[J];北京中医药大学学报;2009年04期
6 张公奇;;曹颖甫《伤寒金匮发微》学术思想探讨[J];陕西中医学院学报;2008年03期
7 李成卫,王庆国;《金匮要略》学术研究史略[J];中国中医基础医学杂志;2005年06期
8 张公奇;周科选;;曹颖甫的伤寒金匮发微和经方实践[J];中国中医药现代远程教育;2004年09期
9 何永明;经方家曹颖甫研究现状评述[J];中医文献杂志;2001年03期
10 黄仰模,郭世光,陈光星;从《读过金匮卷十九》看陈伯坛的学术思想[J];广州中医药大学学报;1999年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘冠军;《皇汉医学》学术思想研究[D];山东中医药大学;2008年
,本文编号:1869018
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/1869018.html
最近更新
教材专著