小麦灌浆期叶片与非叶器官持绿相关性状动态QTL分析
本文关键词: 小麦 非叶器官 持绿 动态QTL 出处:《山西农业大学》2016年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:干旱是影响小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)生产的最主要的非生物胁迫因素。持绿小麦能够延迟光合器官的衰老,增加光合时间,提高光合效率,并对干旱等非生物胁迫与生物胁迫具有较好的抗性。小麦持绿性是受多基因控制的复杂的数量性,借助非条件QTL与条件QTL分析方法对不同灌浆时期旗叶与非叶绿色光合器官持绿相关性状进行遗传分析,可以了解小麦不同绿色器官持绿的发育遗传特性,发掘不受环境影响的与小麦持绿相关基因紧密连锁的稳定标记,将这些标记应用于抗旱分子标记辅助育种,可以大大缩短育种年限,从而提高小麦抗旱和高光效育种的效率。本研究利用包含306个株系的小麦RIL群体(旱选10x鲁麦14)为材料,研究了灌浆不同时期旗叶的SPAD、GLAD以及衰老特征参数,并利用非条件QTL与条件QTL分析方法对旗叶叶绿素含量动态变化进行遗传剖析;利用包含150个株系的小麦DH群体(旱选10×鲁麦14)为材料,分析不同水分条件下灌浆不同时期旗叶与非叶器官叶绿素含量的表型变异,并对各绿色器官叶绿素含量进行条件QTL与非条件QTL分析,探讨小麦灌浆期各绿色光合器官持绿的发育遗传特性。主要结果如下:1.小麦旗叶SPAD与GLAD在整个灌浆期的变化复杂,呈现出‘慢-快-慢”的动态变化特点;灌浆中期SPAD与单株产量、单株穗数、穗粒数呈显著或极显著正相关性,灌浆后期SPAD与籽粒宽、籽粒厚、千粒重、单株产量具有显著或极显著正相关性。灌浆中后期SPAD与产量性状的相关性与相关系数明显优于GLAD与衰老特征参数,且测定相对简单,更适宜用于持绿材料的快速筛选。2.两种水分条件下,在不同灌浆时期(阶段),非条件QTL与条件QTL分析方法分别检测到7个与6个控制旗叶叶绿素含量的加性QTL,对表型变异的贡献率为2.12%~12.80%,这些QTL的表达呈现出时空性与特异性,即多数QTL仅在发育的一个特定时期进行表达,没有检测到能在整个灌浆期持续表达的QTL。两种水分条件下控制旗叶叶绿素含量的发育遗传特性不同,非条件QTL与条件QTL检测方法均表现出干旱胁迫条件下检测到的QTL数量均多于正常灌溉条件。Qchl-5A.1能在两种水分条件下的多个时期同时被检测到,且对表型具有较高的遗传贡献率,具有应用于MAS育种的前景。3.两种水分条件下,在不同灌浆时期(阶段),共检测到控制叶绿素含量的54个加性QTL与29对上位性QTL,对表型变异的贡献率在1.02%~20.95%之间。控制各绿色器官叶绿素含量的QTL在绝大多数时期并不相同。在5A染色体上的WMC74-Xgwm291-Xgwm410标记区间以及3B染色体的Xgwm181-Xgwm340-xgwm247标记区间检测到多个控制各绿色器官叶绿素含量的主效QTL,深入发掘这些热点区域,对于后期进行精细定位与图位克隆具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Drought is the main abiotic stress factor affecting the production of Triticum aestivum L.). Green wheat can delay the senescence of photosynthetic organs, increase photosynthetic time and increase photosynthetic efficiency. Wheat green persistence is a complex quantitative property controlled by many genes, such as drought and other abiotic and biological stresses. With the help of non-conditional QTL and conditional QTL analysis, the green related characters of green photosynthetic organs of flag leaf and non-leaf in different filling stages were analyzed, and the developmental genetic characteristics of green organs in different green organs of wheat could be understood. The identification of stable markers closely linked to green-holding genes in wheat, which are not affected by the environment, and the application of these markers to drought-resistant molecular marker-assisted breeding can greatly shorten the breeding life. In order to improve the efficiency of drought resistance and high light efficiency breeding of wheat, the RIL population (10x Lumai 14) containing 306 lines was used as the material to study the spa dlad and senescence characteristic parameters of flag leaves at different stages of grain filling. The dynamic changes of chlorophyll content in flag leaf were analyzed by non conditional QTL and conditional QTL analysis, and the wheat DH population (10 脳 Lumai 14) containing 150 lines was used as the material. The phenotypic variation of chlorophyll content in flag leaf and non-leaf organ at different filling stage was analyzed under different water conditions, and the chlorophyll content of green organs was analyzed by conditional QTL and non-conditional QTL. The main results were as follows: 1. The changes of SPAD and GLAD in flag leaves of wheat during the whole filling stage were complex, showing the dynamic characteristics of 'slow, fast and slow'. There were significant or extremely significant positive correlations between SPAD and yield per plant, ear number per plant, grain number per ear, and grain width, grain thickness and 1000-grain weight at late grain filling stage. The correlation and correlation coefficient between SPAD and yield characters in the middle and late stage of grain filling were significantly better than those of GLAD and senescence characteristic parameters, and the measurement was relatively simple. It is more suitable for rapid screening of green holding materials. 2. Under two water conditions, At different filling stage (stage, unconditioned QTL and conditional QTL), 7 and 6 additive QTLs were detected to control chlorophyll content in flag leaves, respectively, and the contribution rate to phenotypic variation was 2.12g / 12.80. The expression of these QTL was spatiotemporal and specific. That is to say, most of QTL were expressed only at one specific stage of development, and QTLs, which could be expressed continuously during the whole filling period, were not detected. The developmental genetic characteristics of controlling chlorophyll content in flag leaves were different under two kinds of water conditions. Both non-conditional QTL and conditional QTL methods showed that the number of QTL detected under drought stress was higher than that under normal irrigation condition. Qchl-5A.1 could be detected simultaneously in several periods under two water conditions, and had a higher genetic contribution to phenotype. It has the prospect of application in MAS breeding. Under two kinds of water conditions, At different filling stages, 54 additive QTL and 29 epistatic QTLs were detected to control chlorophyll content, and the contribution to phenotypic variation was between 1.02g and 20.95%. QTL, which controlled chlorophyll content in various green organs, was found in most of the stages. The WMC74-Xgwm291-Xgwm410 marker interval on chromosome 5A and the Xgwm181-Xgwm340-xgwm247 marker interval on chromosome 3B detected multiple major QTLs that controlled the chlorophyll content of various green organs, so as to explore these hot spots. It is of great significance for fine location and map cloning in the later stage.
【学位授予单位】:山西农业大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S512.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张俊灵;孙美荣;闫金龙;张东旭;;山西省旱地小麦育种进展与育种策略探讨[J];农学学报;2015年09期
2 闫雪;史雨刚;梁增浩;杨斌;李晓宇;王曙光;孙黛珍;;小麦旗叶形态相关性状的QTL定位[J];核农学报;2015年07期
3 赵朋;徐凤;蒋文慧;齐鹏;李春莲;白海波;吕学莲;董建力;王中华;;春小麦旗叶长度、宽度及叶绿素含量QTL分析[J];麦类作物学报;2015年05期
4 孙佩光;吴琼;徐碧玉;苗红霞;金志强;;植物滞绿机理研究进展[J];基因组学与应用生物学;2015年02期
5 张英华;杨佑明;曹莲;郝杨凡;黄菁;李金鹏;姚得秀;王志敏;;灌浆期高温对小麦旗叶与非叶器官光合和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J];作物学报;2015年01期
6 陈晓平;杨德龙;栗孟飞;程宏波;幸华;柴守玺;李唯;;干旱胁迫条件下小麦RILs群体花后旗叶持绿性遗传特性及其与千粒重的相关性[J];干旱地区农业研究;2014年06期
7 任钧;王晓磊;高炯;周强;徐永平;蒯本科;;国内大豆品种资源中滞绿(stay-green)性状的初步研究[J];植物生理学报;2014年09期
8 Hongwei Li;Gui Wang;Qi Zheng;Bin Li;Ruilian Jing;Zhensheng Li;;Genetic analysis of biomass and photosynthetic parameters in wheat grown in different light intensities[J];Journal of Integrative Plant Biology;2014年06期
9 李美霞;沈玮囡;杨睿;梁子英;孙风丽;奚亚军;王竹林;刘曙东;;小麦籽粒干物质积累的动态QTL定位[J];西北植物学报;2014年06期
10 常鑫;李法计;张兆萍;张晓晨;刘路平;阳霞;孙道杰;;小麦旗叶长、宽及面积的QTL分析[J];西北植物学报;2014年05期
相关博士学位论文 前8条
1 孙健;水稻耐盐相关性状的发育动态QTL分析[D];东北农业大学;2013年
2 王霖;小麦遗传连锁图谱构建及主要农艺和品质性状QTL定位[D];山东农业大学;2012年
3 王德权;持绿型高粱、玉米对干旱胁迫响应的生理机制比较研究[D];沈阳农业大学;2012年
4 刘宾;小麦主要农艺性状的条件和非条件QTL定位[D];山东农业大学;2011年
5 崔法;高密度小麦遗传连锁图谱构建及产量相关性状QTL定位[D];山东农业大学;2011年
6 韩英鹏;多环境、多遗传背景下不同发育时期大豆籽粒重的QTL分析[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2010年
7 钱雪娅;不同水分条件下小麦重要农艺性状的遗传分析及QTL定位[D];西北农林科技大学;2009年
8 武仙山;小麦抗旱相关性状数量位点的遗传剖析[D];中国农业科学院;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王鑫;小麦滞绿突变体tasg1的抗盐生理机制研究[D];山东农业大学;2014年
2 梁增浩;不同水分条件下小麦持绿相关性状的QTL定位[D];山西农业大学;2013年
3 薛院晓;小麦穗干重和千粒重及相关性状发育动态QTL分析[D];山东农业大学;2013年
4 顾啸;玉米茎秆糖含量动态QTL分析[D];扬州大学;2013年
5 刘志红;玉米持绿性评价及遗传分析[D];四川农业大学;2012年
6 丁安明;小麦关联RIL群体遗传连锁图谱构建及产量相关性状的QTL定位[D];山东农业大学;2011年
7 石慧清;持绿型小麦对花后高温的耐性研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2011年
8 薛晖;持绿型小麦内源激素变化与持绿和抗旱关系研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2010年
9 陈骏伯;“持绿型”小麦延缓衰老的光合作用机制[D];四川农业大学;2010年
10 武永胜;持绿型小麦抗旱性的研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2009年
,本文编号:1514148
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/nykjbs/1514148.html