政府信息不存在案件法律问题探析

发布时间：2018-01-27 00:31

本文关键词： 政府信息不存在证明对象举证责任　出处：《广西大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》(以下简称条例)施行以来,我国的政府信息公开工作取得了长足的发展,公民申请政府信息公开的热情日益高涨,随之政府信息公开行政诉讼案件数量也逐年增加。近年来,各地法院在司法实践中发现了一种新型的政府信息公开行政诉讼案件,即“政府信息不存在”案件。但是由于我国政府信息公开制度起步较晚、立法上的不健全及其他各种因素的影响,法院在审理此类案件的过程中,经常会面临各种困扰,比如政府信息不存在的含义模糊引起各地法院对政府信息不存在的情形的认识产生分歧,证明对象的不统一导致双方的争议焦点混乱,现有举证责任的分配不合理影响证明活动的顺利进行等,从而导致法院的审判活动效率低下,裁判结果也难以令双方满意。本文主要探究了政府信息不存在案件在司法实践中常遇到的三重疑难问题,即如何正确认识政府信息不存在的含义、如何化解证明对象的不统一问题,怎样合理分配双方的举证责任等,试图探索一条理性的路径以破解此类案件在审判实务中的困境。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the regulations of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the regulations), great progress has been made in the work of government information disclosure in our country, and the enthusiasm of citizens in applying for the disclosure of government information is growing day by day. As a result, the number of administrative litigation cases of government information publicity has increased year by year. In recent years, local courts have discovered a new type of administrative litigation cases of government information publicity in judicial practice. That is, "government information does not exist" cases. However, due to the late start of our government information disclosure system, legislation is not perfect and other factors, the court in the process of hearing such cases. Often face a variety of troubles, such as government information does not exist in the meaning of ambiguity caused by local courts on the situation of government information does not exist in the understanding of differences, proving that the object of disunity led to confusion in the focus of dispute between the two sides. The unreasonable distribution of the burden of proof has an impact on the smooth progress of the proof activities, which leads to the inefficiency of the court's trial activities. The result of the judgment is difficult to satisfy both sides. This paper mainly explores the three difficult problems often encountered in the judicial practice of the non-existence of government information, that is, how to correctly understand the meaning of the non-existence of government information. How to resolve the problem of disunity of the object of proof, how to reasonably distribute the burden of proof of both sides, and try to explore a methodical path to solve the plight of such cases in trial practice.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】