个人信息“被遗忘权”保护研究

发布时间：2018-02-02 06:27

本文关键词： 被遗忘权个人信息保护立法　出处：《渤海大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着互联网技术的发展,网络运用也日益增多,公民在网络中发表的大量个人信息也被网络中的虚拟空间所保留。人脑的记忆会随着时间的推移而逐渐遗忘,但是网络却实现了永久不遗忘的特性,这种特性将会产生两面性,一方面可以给人类建立一个历史性的数据库,保存以前的数据;另一方面,这些永不消失的网络记忆将时时刻刻提醒人类那些不愿再看到的过往。个人信息在网络中的保留,尤其是个人负面信息的保留容易对个人产生长久的不利影响。为了消除这种不利影响,欧盟提出了“被遗忘权”,美国也在逐渐认可这种新型的权利,但是我国并没有这方面的专门规定,这显然和世界发展的趋势是不合时宜的。本文将以“中国被遗忘权第一案”任某诉百度科技有限公司侵犯其“被遗忘权”案为例,详细阐述“被遗忘权”。其中法官以中国并没有“被遗忘权”的相关规定做出了不予支持的判决,从而反映出在我国实践中的相关立法并不是十分的完善,我国应该在发展的潮流中与时俱进,借鉴外国的相关判例,探讨在中国应该怎样设置“被遗忘权”以及设置“被遗忘权”的法律意义。《中国民法典》颁布在即,研究“被遗忘权”将对民法典的颁布产生一定的影响,我国虽然规定了较为健全的人格权体系,但是网络中的个人信息保护属于网络人格权的一种,我国在这方面却少有涉及,关于网络中的个人信息的保护或者说网络上隐私权的保护并没有专门的规定,所以现在研究“被遗忘权”很有必要。
[Abstract]:With the development of Internet technology, the use of the network is increasing, a large number of personal information published by citizens in the network is also retained by the virtual space in the network. The memory of human brain will be forgotten gradually with the passage of time. But the network has realized the characteristic of forever not forgetting, this kind of characteristic will produce two sides, on the one hand, can build a historical database for the mankind, save the former data; On the other hand, these never-ending online memories will constantly remind humans of the past that they do not want to see any more. In particular, the retention of personal negative information is likely to have a long-term adverse impact on the individual. In order to eliminate this adverse effect, the European Union has proposed the "right to be forgotten", and the United States is gradually recognizing this new right. However, there are no specific provisions in this regard in our country. This is obviously out of date with the trend of world development. This article will take the case of "China's right to be forgotten first case" Ren v. Baidu Science and Technology Co., Ltd. to violate its "right to be forgotten" case as an example. Elaborated "forgotten right". One of the judges in China and there is no "right to be forgotten" the relevant provisions of the decision not to support, thus reflecting that the relevant legislation in China's practice is not very perfect. China should keep pace with the times in the trend of development and draw lessons from relevant foreign jurisprudence. This paper discusses how to set up the "right to be forgotten" and the legal significance of "the right to be forgotten" in China. The promulgation of the Civil Code of China is imminent. The study of the "right to be forgotten" will have a certain impact on the promulgation of the Civil Code. Although China has a relatively sound personality rights system, but the protection of personal information in the network is a kind of network personality rights, but our country rarely involved in this aspect. There are no special regulations on the protection of personal information or the right to privacy on the Internet, so it is necessary to study the right to be forgotten.
【学位授予单位】：渤海大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】