两岸诽谤罪立法与适用比较

发布时间：2018-02-09 20:06

本文关键词： 台湾诽谤犯罪名誉权法律适用比较分析　出处：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着中国大陆地区与台湾地区交流的日益频繁,两岸由于历史原因所造成的刑法理论的差异也在深深的影响着对方刑法学界理论的研究。以此为典型的是中国台湾地区刑法关于诽谤罪的规定。两岸刑法中的诽谤罪在犯罪构成特征、免责事由、法律适用等方面存在较大不同。大陆地区对诽谤罪的构成要件有两个方面要求:首先要有“捏造事实”的行为,其次要有“情节严重”的情形。台湾地区刑法中对于诽谤罪的构成要件方面限制相对较少,体现在并不要求有“捏造事实”的行为和“情节严重”的情形才构成诽谤罪。台湾地区多根据免责事由的规定来限制刑法对于诽谤罪的处罚。在法律适用方面,针对历年来两岸所发生的诽谤犯罪,亦有不同的对待与判决理由。本文拟通过对比大陆与台湾刑法中诽谤罪立法与法律适用方面的不同,从言论自由权与名誉权平衡角度考虑并分析诽谤罪应如何在相互借鉴中彼此完善。
[Abstract]:With the increasing exchanges between mainland China and Taiwan, The differences in criminal law theories between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait due to historical reasons are also deeply influencing the study of the other side's criminal law theory. This is typical of the provisions of the criminal law on libel in the Taiwan region of China. The slander in the criminal law of the two sides of the strait is also deeply influenced. Slander is characteristic of crime, There are two requirements for the constitution of libel in mainland China: firstly, there should be "fabricating facts". Secondly, there should be "serious circumstances". In Taiwan's criminal law, there are relatively few restrictions on the elements of libel. This is reflected in the fact that "fabricated facts" and "serious circumstances" are not required to constitute libel. In the Taiwan region, the criminal law restricts the punishment of libel in accordance with the provisions of exemption. In terms of the application of the law, There are also different treatment and judgment reasons for libel crimes on both sides of the Taiwan Strait over the years. This paper intends to compare the legislation and application of libel in the criminal law of mainland China and Taiwan. From the angle of balance between the right of freedom of speech and the right of reputation, this paper analyzes how libel should be perfected in the mutual reference.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】