反腐廉政新常态下的基层纪检监察工作

发布时间：2018-03-03 21:35

本文选题：基层纪检监察　切入点：反腐败　出处：《南京大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：十八大以来,面对错综复杂的国际形势以及我国全面深化改革迈入关键阶段的新形势,党和政府高度重视反腐倡廉工作,各级纪检监察机关不仅打"老虎",还拍"苍蝇",持续强化震慑作用,坚决遏制腐败的蔓延,取得了一定的成效。但反腐斗争是一场持久战,必须不断完善相关法律法规,加大处罚力度,建立长效监督机制,才能确保反腐败能够持续有效。中央纪委屡屡公布的各项反腐工作数据举世瞩目,但不应忽视这些数据背后凝聚着大量基层纪检监察干部的智慧和汗水。要想建立健全反腐机制,履行好纪检机关监督责任,就必须走进基层纪检监察机关,深入分析纪检监察干部在日常工作遇到的问题和困难,并采取科学合理和操作性强的解决措施。本文通过查阅资料文献,分析纪检监察机关的基本职责以及一般工作流程。面对宏观环境的变化,从国际国内新形势、反腐倡廉新特点、中央纪委新思路等角度分析十八大以来反腐廉政的新常态。通过分析中央纪委监察部通报的各项数据和典型案例,凸显了当前纪检监察围绕着提高群众满意度,重点整肃基层干部"四风"问题,重点查处基层干部违规违纪问题。通过实证分析A县纪委监察局的机构设置及绩效考核等工作情况,可以发现基层纪检部门的工作重心由抓大案开始向抓党风进行调整。但基层纪检仍存在较大信访压力,群众工作琐碎繁杂,以及乡镇纪委监督不力等问题。信访工作方面的问题,主要表现在举报方式传统、重复和越级举报高居不下以及信访成案率不高。乡镇纪检队伍配置薄弱、乡镇纪检工作缺乏独立性、农村干部监察困难等因素,导致乡镇纪检监察长期监督失位失效。从宏观机制上看,我国反腐机构设置不合理,存在职责分工不清、缺乏有效协同合作以及纪检监察双重领导等问题。基层纪检监察机关工作任务繁重,由于职务晋升通道不畅和工作成就感不高,基层纪检监察干部的工作幸福感并不高。最后,建议有关机关从合并成立唯一反腐机构、简化基层纪检工作程序、多举措强化乡镇纪委的监督职责、全方面打造人民纪检卫士和完善基层纪检队伍激励等角度,改善基层纪检监察工作。
[Abstract]:Since the 18 National Congress, the Party and the government have attached great importance to the work of combating corruption and promoting honesty in the face of the complicated international situation and the new situation in which China's comprehensive deepening of reform has entered a critical stage. Discipline inspection and supervision organs at all levels not only beat "tigers" but also "flies", continued to strengthen the deterrent role, resolutely curb the spread of corruption, and achieved certain results. But the anti-corruption struggle is a protracted battle, and we must constantly improve relevant laws and regulations. Only by increasing penalties and establishing a long-term supervisory mechanism can we ensure that anti-corruption efforts can be sustained and effective. The data on anti-corruption work published repeatedly by the Central discipline Inspection Commission have attracted worldwide attention. However, we should not ignore the wisdom and sweat of a large number of grass-roots discipline inspection and supervisory cadres behind these data. If we want to establish and improve the anti-corruption mechanism and fulfill the supervisory responsibility of discipline inspection organs, we must go into the grass-roots discipline inspection and supervision organs. The problems and difficulties encountered by discipline inspection and supervision cadres in their daily work are deeply analyzed, and scientific, reasonable and operable solutions are taken. Analyzing the basic duties and general work flow of discipline inspection and supervision organs. In the face of the changes in the macro environment, from the new international and domestic situation, the new features of combating corruption and advocating clean government, The new ideas of the Central Commission for discipline Inspection have analyzed the new normal situation of anti-corruption and clean government since the 18 Congress. Through the analysis of the data and typical cases reported by the Central discipline Inspection and Supervision Department, it is highlighted that the current discipline inspection and supervision work revolves around improving the satisfaction of the masses. Focusing on the "four styles" of eliminating grassroots cadres, focusing on the investigation and handling of violations of discipline by grass-roots cadres. Through an empirical analysis of the institutional setup and performance appraisal of the Supervision Bureau of County A Disciplinary Commission, It can be found that the focus of the work of the grass-roots discipline inspection departments has been adjusted from grasping the major cases to the party style. However, there is still greater pressure on the basic discipline inspection departments to submit letters and visits, and the mass work is trivial and complicated. As well as the lack of supervision by the Township discipline Inspection Commission. The problems in the work of letters and visits are mainly manifested in the traditional way of reporting, repeated and leapfrogging reports, and the low rate of successful cases of letters and visits. The allocation of discipline inspection teams in villages and towns is weak. The lack of independence in the discipline inspection work in villages and towns, the difficulties in the supervision of rural cadres, and other factors lead to the long-term failure of supervision of discipline inspection and supervision in villages and towns. From the macro mechanism point of view, the establishment of anti-corruption institutions in China is unreasonable, and the division of duties and responsibilities is not clear. Lack of effective cooperation and dual leadership in discipline inspection and supervision. The work tasks of the discipline inspection and supervision organs at the grass-roots level are heavy. Due to the lack of channels for promotion and a low sense of job achievement, the work happiness of the grass-roots discipline inspection and supervision cadres is not high. Finally, From the angles of merging and setting up a sole anti-corruption agency, simplifying the procedures of discipline inspection at the grass-roots level, strengthening the supervisory responsibilities of the township discipline inspection committees, building up the people's discipline inspection guards in all aspects, and perfecting the incentives of the discipline inspection team at the grass-roots level, it is suggested that the relevant organs should, We will improve discipline inspection and supervision at the grass-roots level.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D262.6

【参考文献】