《中国—澳大利亚自由贸易协定》贸易救济措施研究

发布时间：2018-04-06 03:38

本文选题：中澳自贸协定　切入点：贸易救济措施　出处：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：从2005年中澳自贸谈判正式启动,到2015的正式签订,历时十年。“十年磨一剑”,磨出了《中国-澳大利亚自由贸易协定》(以下简称中澳自贸协定)的丰富内容。经历一年的实施,中澳自贸协定为中、澳两国的经济发展带来了利好。作为自由贸易的安全阀,贸易救济措施在中澳自贸协定中举足轻重:高效率和高效能的贸易救济措施是保护国内产业的有力武器,但是滥用贸易救济措施则会破坏已有的经贸秩序,阻碍自由贸易的发展。为预防贸易救济措施滥用,需要加强对中澳自贸协定贸易救济措施的研究。中澳自贸协定贸易救济措施包含:双边保障措施、全球保障措施、反倾销措施及反补贴措施。与世界贸易组织(以下简称世贸组织)框架下的贸易救济措施相比,中澳自贸协定增加了双边保障措施,对反倾销和反补贴调查的透明度和磋商程序提出了更高要求,但未涉及特殊保障措施和敏感内容;与其他自贸协定的贸易救济措施相比,中澳自贸协定在双边保障措施的实施条件和实施程序上更加严格,但在反倾销措施和反补贴措施上存在着一些不足。为此,中澳自贸协定的贸易救济措施需要完善,一方面使其在适用时更具操作性,另一方面在出现贸易救济措施争端时有理有据:首先,强调双边保障措施在过渡期内的优先适用;尽可能量化进口增加、严重损害及严重损害威胁等重要定义。其次,积极磋商,限制反倾销调查和反补贴调查的启动;控制反倾销措施及反补贴措施的实施。再次,可在条件成就时,启动特殊保障措施的谈判工作,并设立贸易救济措施专门机构,对相关问题进行讨论和研究。
[Abstract]:From 2005 to the formal start of the free trade negotiations, to the formal signing of 2015, lasting 10 years.China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) has been sharpened in ten years.After a year of implementation, the free trade agreement between China and Australia, Australia and the economic development has brought good.As a safety valve of free trade, trade relief measures play an important role in the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: efficient and effective trade relief measures are a powerful weapon to protect domestic industries.However, the abuse of trade remedies will undermine the existing economic and trade order and hinder the development of free trade.In order to prevent the abuse of trade relief measures, it is necessary to strengthen the research on the trade relief measures of the Free Trade Agreement between China and Australia.The trade relief measures of the FTA include bilateral safeguard measures, global safeguard measures, anti-dumping measures and countervailing measures.Compared with trade relief measures within the framework of the World Trade Organization (hereinafter referred to as WTO), the FTA adds bilateral safeguards and imposes higher requirements on transparency and consultation procedures in anti-dumping and countervailing investigations.However, special safeguard measures and sensitive elements are not covered; compared with trade relief measures in other free trade agreements, China-Australia free trade agreements are more stringent in terms of the conditions and procedures for the implementation of bilateral safeguard measures.However, there are some deficiencies in anti-dumping measures and anti-subsidy measures.Therefore, the Sino-Australian Free Trade Agreement (FTA) trade relief measures need to be improved, on the one hand, to make them more operational when applicable, on the other hand, in the event of disputes over trade relief measures, there is reasonable evidence: first,Emphasis is placed on the priority application of bilateral safeguards during the transition period, as well as on the quantification of imports as much as possible, serious damage and serious threat of damage, and other important definitions.Secondly, we should actively discuss and restrict the initiation of anti-dumping investigation and countervailing investigation, and control the implementation of anti-dumping measures and countervailing measures.Third, negotiations on special safeguard measures can be initiated when conditions are met, and a special agency for trade relief measures can be established to discuss and study related issues.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.295;D822.361.1

【相似文献】