刑事庭前会议制度的效能问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-10 01:08

本文选题：庭前会议　切入点：效能　出处：《中国政法大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：庭前会议制度是2013年修订的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百八十二条新增加的一项制度。在法庭审判前对可能影响公正审判的问题听取意见,了解情况,有助于法官确定庭审重点,提高庭审效率,保障庭审质量。(1)随着刑事诉讼程序的不断改革与完善,审判程序的地位日益上升,以庭审为中心的刑事审判程序成为当前刑事诉讼程序改革的重中之重,也成为评价刑事诉讼工作的关键要素。在实务界,为了增强刑事庭前会议的可行性,部分地方司法机关也做出了相应举动,制定刑事庭前会议试行规则等相关文件。在理论界,该制度成为了研究热点,学者在各方面提出问题并形成独到见解,成果颇丰。庭前会议之所以一出现就备受关注并且引起广泛讨论,是因为它出现的必要性和现实性,刑事庭前会议对提高庭审效率、发挥庭审作用的重要性不言而喻。如何更好的保障庭审并发挥其决定性作用、如何实现以审判为中心,成为了法律界共同的课题,刑事庭前会议制度无疑将在其中发挥重大作用。笔者跟随中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院“刑事诉讼庭前会议制度研究”项目组对北京市、江苏省盐城市和无锡市的12个相关司法机关展开了实地调研和实证考察。本文将从法院的视角出发,选取其中5个地区相关法院召开庭前会议的数据进行分析和比较,以此为基础对该制度展开一系列的观察和讨论。力求在实践数据的基础上结合文献分析,设计和验证该制度的效能作用,为推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革提出有益建议。本文共分为四个部分,在第一章我国刑事庭前会议制度概述中,阐述该制度出台的理论背景与现实意义,并结合当下立法规定来探讨刑事庭前会议制度的效能作用,分析认为该制度的主要效能是保障庭审的集中进行、提高诉讼效率、加强程序正义;第二章从实证考察的角度对刑事庭前会议的实施情况进行分析,结合A、B、C、D、E五地两级调研法院自刑事诉讼法修改以来召开刑事庭前会议的相关数据,从庭前会议制度总体适用情况和庭前会议具体适用程序两个大方面展开分析;第三章在经过一系列对庭前会议制度司法实践现状分析后,进而探讨目前司法实践中存在的难点及制度运行之障碍,主要集中于制度适用率低、制度实施的具体程序不规范和庭前会议效力不明确这三大方面;最后,通过对现存问题的深度剖析和思考,探寻我国刑事庭前会议制度的发展方向与问题解决之路径:首先应就庭前会议制度本身进行完善,其次应当建立健全相关的配套制度,通过建立健全完善被告人诉讼权益保障制度、完善证据开示制度、提升司法信息化水平等一系列配套制度来为庭前会议制度的有序发展保驾护航。
[Abstract]:Pre-court meeting system is a new system of Article 182 of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, which was revised in 2013.Hearing opinions and learning about issues that may affect a fair trial before the trial of the court will help the judge to determine the priorities of the trial, improve the efficiency of the trial, and guarantee the quality of the trial.) with the continuous reform and improvement of the criminal procedure,The status of the trial procedure is rising day by day. The criminal trial procedure centered on the trial becomes the most important part of the reform of the current criminal procedure and the key element of the evaluation of the criminal procedure.In practice, in order to enhance the feasibility of the pre-court meeting, some local judicial organs have also made corresponding actions to formulate the trial rules of the pre-court meeting and other relevant documents.In the theoretical circle, the system has become a research hotspot.The reason why the pre-court meeting has attracted much attention and caused extensive discussion is because of its necessity and reality. The importance of the pre-court meeting in improving the efficiency of the trial and playing the role of the trial is self-evident.How to better protect the trial and play its decisive role, how to realize the trial as the center, has become a common topic in the legal profession, the criminal court conference system will undoubtedly play a major role in it.Following the project of "study on the system of Pre-court meeting in Criminal procedure" of the Institute of procedural Law of China University of political Science and Law, the author has carried out field investigation and empirical investigation on 12 relevant judicial organs in Beijing, Yancheng and Wuxi of Jiangsu Province.In this paper, from the perspective of the court, we choose the data of the pre-court meeting held by the relevant courts in five regions for analysis and comparison, and then make a series of observations and discussions on the system.Based on the practical data, this paper tries to design and verify the effectiveness of the system based on the literature analysis, and puts forward some useful suggestions for the reform of the trial centered litigation system.This paper is divided into four parts. In the first chapter, the author expounds the theoretical background and practical significance of the system, and discusses the effectiveness of the system in the light of the current legislation.The main effectiveness of the system is to ensure the centralized conduct of the trial, improve the efficiency of the proceedings, strengthen procedural justice. Chapter II from the perspective of empirical investigation of the implementation of the pre-court meeting of the criminal analysis,Based on the relevant data of the criminal court meeting held since the revision of the Criminal procedure Law, this paper analyzes the general application of the pre-court meeting system and the concrete application procedure of the pre-court meeting.After a series of analysis on the present situation of the judicial practice of the pretrial conference system, the third chapter probes into the difficulties in the present judicial practice and the obstacles to the operation of the system, mainly focusing on the low application rate of the system.The specific procedures of system implementation are not standardized and the effectiveness of the pre-trial meeting is not clear. Finally, through the in-depth analysis and reflection on the existing problems,First of all, we should perfect the pre-court conference system itself, and secondly, we should establish and perfect the relevant supporting system.A series of supporting systems, such as establishing and perfecting the protection system of defendant's litigation rights and interests, perfecting the system of discovery of evidence and improving the level of judicial information, are used to escort the orderly development of the system of pre-trial conference.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】