滥用标准必要专利的反垄断救济问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 18:50

本文选题：标准必要专利 + FRAND原则　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：科学技术是第一生产力。随着高新技术的不断发展,技术创新的速度加快,经济全球化也日益加强。标准必要专利就是在这样的背景下产生的。将标准与专利结合在一起,造就了标准必要专利。标准必要专利的产生,将标准的公共性和专利的私权性融合在一起,力求能够取得最大的经济效益。但是,由于二者之间的矛盾,也不可避免的造成了权利的滥用。尽管现在相关方已经对标准必要专利许可时采用的FRAND原则的内涵做了解释,但是仍然比较抽象,这也是造成标准必要专利滥用的原因。关于标准必要专利的滥用行为,一般都是考虑FRAND原则下的专利滥用,主要包括不合理拒绝许可,滥用禁令权,将标准必要专利与非标准必要专利搭售或者进行一揽子许可,还有违反FRAND原则的不合理定价。在这种情况下来探寻滥用标准标准必要专利的反垄断救济方式是非常必要的。针对滥用标准必要专利的反垄断救济,从法律和实践两个方面进行研究。通过对国内外的法律规定和实践案例进行对比分析,在实践中寻找救济的方式。经过对比研究,对我国滥用标准必要专利的反垄断救济方式提出建议。
[Abstract]:Science and technology are the primary productive forces. With the continuous development of high-tech, the speed of technological innovation is accelerating, and economic globalization is increasingly strengthened. It is in this context that the necessary patent for standards is produced. Combining standards with patents creates necessary patents for standards. The emergence of the necessary patent of the standard combines the publicity of the standard with the private right of the patent in order to obtain the greatest economic benefit. However, due to the contradiction between the two, also inevitably caused abuse of rights. Although the relevant parties have now explained the connotation of the FRAND principle used in the standard necessary patent license, it is still abstract, which is also the reason for the abuse of the standard essential patent. As for the abuse of standard essential patent, the abuse of patent under the principle of FRAND is generally considered, which mainly includes unreasonable refusal of license, abuse of prohibition power, linking standard essential patent with non-standard essential patent or carrying out a package license. There are also unreasonable pricing in violation of FRAND principles. In this case, it is necessary to explore the anti-monopoly remedies for the abuse of standard essential patents. The anti-monopoly remedy for abuse of standard necessary patent is studied from two aspects: law and practice. Through the comparative analysis of domestic and foreign legal provisions and practical cases, the way of relief is sought in practice. Through comparative study, some suggestions on anti-monopoly remedy for abuse of standard patent are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】