社会危害性理论之辨正

发布时间：2018-05-23 16:05

本文选题：社会危害性 + 刑事违法性　；参考：《广西大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：社会危害性是我国刑法学的基本范畴与核心概念。然而罪刑法定原则在九七年刑法典中得到确立之后,并随着外国刑法思想的影响,社会危害性理论饱受争议,学者们各执己见,褒贬参半。本文站在通说的立场上,通过对社会危害性理论发展历程进行概况回顾,并简单阐述了社会危害性理论争议的现状,以及对社会危害性本体理论的研究,对各家学说进行评述并对社会危害性基础理论进行重新解读,然后对社会危害性与相邻概念的关系进行讨论,以期进一步明确社会危害性的具体内容,对社会危害性的规范性、实体性和专属性进行说明,进而继续确立社会危害性在中国刑法体系的地位,从而继续展现社会危害性理论之于我国刑法学的合理性。本文分为三个部分。先是简明的阐述了社会危害性理论的争议产生的原因和研究现状,以明确思路。再分别对社会危害性的本质、概念、性质、内容和价值的争论进行评述并提出自己的观点重新解释其基础理论。最后分别对社会危害性理论在我国刑事立法和刑事司法的立法指导和出罪机能进行阐述,并论述了罪刑法定原则与社会危害性的关系,以二元结构的犯罪构成为出发点完善犯罪构成与社会危害性的关系,进而完善社会危害性的评价标准。
[Abstract]:Social harmfulness is the basic category and core concept of criminal law in China. However, after the principle of legality was established in the Criminal Code of 1997, and with the influence of foreign criminal law thought, the theory of social harmfulness was controversial. From the standpoint of general theory, this paper reviews the development course of social harmfulness theory, and briefly expounds the status quo of social harmfulness theory controversy and the study of social harmfulness ontology theory. This paper comments on various theories and reinterprets the basic theory of social harmfulness, and then discusses the relationship between social harmfulness and adjacent concepts, in order to further clarify the concrete contents of social harmfulness and the standardization of social harmfulness. In order to establish the status of social harmfulness in the criminal law system of China, the rationality of the theory of social harmfulness in Chinese criminal law can be further demonstrated. This paper is divided into three parts. First of all, the reasons and research status of the controversy of social harmfulness theory are briefly expounded to clarify the ideas. Then it comments on the nature, concept, nature, content and value of social harmfulness, and puts forward its own viewpoint to explain its basic theory. Finally, the author expounds the guidance and function of social harmfulness theory in criminal legislation and criminal justice in China, and discusses the relationship between the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime and social harmfulness. Taking the dual structure of crime as the starting point to perfect the relationship between the crime constitution and the social harmfulness, and then to perfect the evaluation standard of the social harmfulness.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】