清代乾嘉时期家族内部犯罪研究
发布时间:2018-06-04 09:52
本文选题:乾嘉时期 + 家族 ; 参考:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:清代是较为繁荣的一个朝代,其对犯罪的记载也较为详尽。据统计,乾嘉时期家族内部多发人命、斗殴和伦理类犯罪。这些犯罪多使用刀斧等简单犯罪工具,并具有奸罪数量多、已婚女实施犯罪多于未婚女的特点。出现这种现象是因为封建等级秩序对家长权的维护、对女性的歧视。且家族成员多有同居共财关系,物质资料的争夺和封建礼教不断的压迫催生了家族成员间的犯罪行为。受礼法合一的影响,这些犯罪受到当时法律的重视。统治者注重维护封建家族内部的等级秩序,所以尊长受到的处罚往往轻于卑幼。刑罚中杖刑多作为徒刑和流刑的附加刑适用,且适用流刑时出现了加重刑和替代刑。面对家族内部犯罪,乾嘉时期的相关刑罚,体现了维护封建伦理道德、血缘关系和情理法兼顾的原则,这些原则有助于惩罚家族内部犯罪,提高家族凝聚力,促进社会和谐。但尊卑有别在封建思想中根深蒂固,法律对其过度维护,易导致家族内部犯罪适用刑罚的不平等。
[Abstract]:Qing Dynasty is a more prosperous dynasty, its record of crime is more detailed. According to statistics, the Qianjia period of family life, fighting and ethical crimes. These crimes use simple instruments such as knives and axes, and have the characteristics of more crimes committed by married women than those committed by unmarried women. This phenomenon is due to the feudal hierarchy of the maintenance of parental power, discrimination against women. And most of the family members have cohabitation and common financial relations, the material competition and the constant oppression of feudal ethics gave birth to the criminal behavior among the family members. Influenced by the unity of etiquette and law, these crimes were valued by the law at that time. Rulers pay attention to maintaining the hierarchical order within the feudal family, so the punishment of the elders is often lighter than the inferiority. In penalty, wand penalty is mostly used as supplementary punishment of imprisonment and flow penalty, and heavier penalty and substitute penalty appear when applying flow penalty. In the face of the crime within the family, the relevant penalties during the Qianjia period embodied the principles of maintaining feudal ethics, kinship and reason, which helped to punish the crime within the family, improve the cohesion of the family and promote social harmony. However, the superiority and inferiority are deeply rooted in the feudal thought, and the law overmaintains them, which easily leads to the inequality of the penalty applied to the crime within the family.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈小洁;;清代司法判例情理表达的内在价值及现代启示[J];法学;2016年11期
2 颜丽媛;;对清代因与人通奸后杀死本夫案中妻子的量刑例外的考察[J];中国刑事法杂志;2015年01期
3 钱泳宏;;《大清律例》“夫尊妻卑”对夫犯妻的影响——以“夫因生活琐事杀妻”案为考察中心[J];北方法学;2014年04期
4 钱泳宏;;防控与失控:清代重惩奸罪与“因奸杀夫”[J];华东政法大学学报;2012年01期
5 钱泳宏;;清代夫权的法定与恣意——基于《大清律例》与刑科档案的考察[J];北方法学;2011年03期
6 续晓梅;;传统法律中“罪家长”制度研究——以《大清律例》为视角[J];现代法学;2011年01期
7 徐忠明;;清代中国司法裁判的形式化与实质化——以《病榻梦痕录》所载案件为中心的考察[J];政法论坛;2007年02期
8 张先昌;《开皇律》的修订及其在中国法制史上的地位[J];法学研究;2002年04期
9 霍存福;中国传统法文化的文化性状与文化追寻──情理法的发生、发展及其命运[J];法制与社会发展;2001年03期
10 王跃生;清代中期婚姻行为分析——立足于1781—1791年的考察[J];历史研究;2000年06期
,本文编号:1976928
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1976928.html