当前我国城市街道治理：内生逻辑与实践探索
发布时间：2018-11-14 17:31
【摘要】：十八大以来,以习近平为首的党中央治国理政新理念新思想新战略为基层社会治理创新指明了方向。街道作为基层政府的派出机关,它既是政府行政权力体系的一部分,又是社会治理体系的重要组成部分。街道治理是社会治理的重心,街道体制创新是社会结构现代化转型的根本性问题。当前,我国社会结构向现代化变迁的转型过程中,政府职能转移逐步制度化,城乡社会组织不断发展;街道改革逐步多元化,社区治理不断创新;公共服务均等化,供给侧结构性改革不断深入;治理手段不断技术化,现代社会治理理论不断深入发展。因此,在社会治理创新语境下,街道治理所追求的终极目标是社区公共服务的共建共享,街道职能回归与重新定位有其现实需求。在“管理”向“治理”转型发展过程中,街道职能转移与服务管理方式创新正逐步由由单一管理向多元服务、由政社不分向政社分开、由全面覆盖向突出重点、由机构臃肿向有效精简的趋势发展。同时,在街道的行政性与社会性双重属性驱动下,各地围绕街道治理创新展开了丰富实践,形成了“街道政府化”、“撤销街道办”、“虚区实街”和“强化街道职能”四种典型发展模式。就各地开展的具体实践活动而言,各地探索主要是围绕多中心网络化治理、枢纽型信息化建构、整体性扁平化改革、全方位精准化服务以及赋权式组织化协同等方式进行,在促进多元民主协商、驱动服务流程再造、强化社区自治功能、提升服务管理能力和拓宽政社互动空间等方面取得了显著成效。然而,从街道职能转移的合法性基础、街道治理创新的社会期待和社区转向等街道治理转型的结构性条件来看,街道职能转移与服务管理创新在法治化、制度化和信息化建设方面还存在不足。而街道治理中存在的问题将是不断推动治理机制创新的强大推动力,梳理街道服务管理体制改革变迁历史、探索街道治理的内在逻辑、总结街道治理改革创新模式,对于推动街道治理创新,回应社会治理创新的发展需求,响应中央和地方进行社会治理创新的号召,为国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化探索现实路径具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC Central Committee, the Party Central Committee's new ideas and new strategies have pointed out the direction of social governance innovation at the grass-roots level. As the dispatch organ of grass-roots government, street is not only a part of government administrative power system, but also an important part of social governance system. Street governance is the focus of social governance, and the innovation of street system is the fundamental problem in the modernization of social structure. At present, in the process of transformation from social structure to modernization, the transfer of government functions is gradually institutionalized, the social organizations in urban and rural areas continue to develop, the street reform is gradually diversified, and the community governance is constantly innovated. The equalization of public services, the deepening of supply-side structural reform, the continuous technological development of governance means, and the deepening development of modern social governance theory. Therefore, in the context of social governance innovation, the ultimate goal of street governance is the co-construction and sharing of community public services. In the process of transition from "management" to "governance", the transformation of street functions and the innovation of service management methods are gradually changing from single management to pluralistic service, from government to society, from comprehensive coverage to emphases. The trend from bloated organizations to efficient streamlining. At the same time, driven by the dual attributes of administration and sociality of the street, various localities have carried out rich practices around the street governance innovation, forming "street governmentalization" and "abolishing the street office". There are four typical development models of "virtual district real street" and "strengthening street function". As far as the specific practical activities carried out by various localities are concerned, local exploration is mainly carried out by means of multi-center networked governance, hub information construction, overall flat reform, all-directional precision service, and organization and coordination of empowerment, and so on. It has achieved remarkable results in promoting pluralistic democratic negotiation, driving service process reengineering, strengthening the function of community autonomy, enhancing service management ability and broadening the interaction space between government and society. However, from the legal basis of street function transfer, the social expectation of street governance innovation and the structural conditions of street governance transformation such as community transformation, street function transfer and service management innovation are governed by law. There are still deficiencies in institutionalization and information construction. The existing problems in street governance will be a powerful driving force to continuously promote the innovation of governance mechanism, comb the history of the reform and change of street service management system, explore the inherent logic of street governance, sum up the innovative mode of street governance reform. It is of great significance to promote the innovation of street governance, to respond to the development demand of social governance innovation, to respond to the call of central and local governments to innovate in social governance, and to explore the realistic path for the modernization of national governance system and governance ability.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630
本文编号：2331835
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC Central Committee, the Party Central Committee's new ideas and new strategies have pointed out the direction of social governance innovation at the grass-roots level. As the dispatch organ of grass-roots government, street is not only a part of government administrative power system, but also an important part of social governance system. Street governance is the focus of social governance, and the innovation of street system is the fundamental problem in the modernization of social structure. At present, in the process of transformation from social structure to modernization, the transfer of government functions is gradually institutionalized, the social organizations in urban and rural areas continue to develop, the street reform is gradually diversified, and the community governance is constantly innovated. The equalization of public services, the deepening of supply-side structural reform, the continuous technological development of governance means, and the deepening development of modern social governance theory. Therefore, in the context of social governance innovation, the ultimate goal of street governance is the co-construction and sharing of community public services. In the process of transition from "management" to "governance", the transformation of street functions and the innovation of service management methods are gradually changing from single management to pluralistic service, from government to society, from comprehensive coverage to emphases. The trend from bloated organizations to efficient streamlining. At the same time, driven by the dual attributes of administration and sociality of the street, various localities have carried out rich practices around the street governance innovation, forming "street governmentalization" and "abolishing the street office". There are four typical development models of "virtual district real street" and "strengthening street function". As far as the specific practical activities carried out by various localities are concerned, local exploration is mainly carried out by means of multi-center networked governance, hub information construction, overall flat reform, all-directional precision service, and organization and coordination of empowerment, and so on. It has achieved remarkable results in promoting pluralistic democratic negotiation, driving service process reengineering, strengthening the function of community autonomy, enhancing service management ability and broadening the interaction space between government and society. However, from the legal basis of street function transfer, the social expectation of street governance innovation and the structural conditions of street governance transformation such as community transformation, street function transfer and service management innovation are governed by law. There are still deficiencies in institutionalization and information construction. The existing problems in street governance will be a powerful driving force to continuously promote the innovation of governance mechanism, comb the history of the reform and change of street service management system, explore the inherent logic of street governance, sum up the innovative mode of street governance reform. It is of great significance to promote the innovation of street governance, to respond to the development demand of social governance innovation, to respond to the call of central and local governments to innovate in social governance, and to explore the realistic path for the modernization of national governance system and governance ability.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘冰;;精准化服务 精细化治理——探索“全响应”网格化社会治理新模式[J];社会治理;2016年03期
2 陈荣卓;申鲁菁;;我国城市社区公共服务创新:地方经验与发展趋势[J];当代世界社会主义问题;2016年01期
3 吴晓霞;;当代中国城市基层治理的历史演进[J];当代中国史研究;2016年02期
4 袁方成;罗家为;;十八大以来城乡基层治理的新方向、新格局与新路径[J];社会主义研究;2016年01期
5 王庆明;;城市治理转型与基层权力重组——以沈阳街道办改革为例[J];人文杂志;2015年08期
6 李立国;;创新社会治理体制[J];求是;2013年24期
7 陈荣卓;陈鹏;;新型城镇化背景下现代农村社会组织管理体制构建研究[J];社会主义研究;2013年06期
8 田恒;;论城市基层治理分权化改革——基于撤销街道办事处的分析[J];中州学刊;2013年09期
9 敬海新;;基层政府社会管理扁平化机制建设对策[J];理论探讨;2013年05期
10 刘明君;刘天旭;;精细化管理与基层政府治理创新——以桃园模式为例[J];甘肃社会科学;2010年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 何海兵;;街道体制改革的路径与方向[N];文汇报;2015年
，本文编号：2331835
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2331835.html
