拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪构成要件疑难问题研究
发布时间：2018-12-07 18:24
【摘要】：网络技术的发展如火如荼,随之而来,网络犯罪占全国犯罪总数的比重也越来越大。网络服务提供者作为网络运作链条上的关键一环,以其技术上的优越性、先进性,担负起了更多的法律义务,在打击网络犯罪过程中扮演着越来越重要的角色。但由于刑法对网络服务提供者刑事责任的规定不完善,所以在实践中,越来越多的网络服务提供者由于不履行网络安全管理义务,造成严重后果的情形难以找到合适的法律依据去定罪量刑,立法上不得不考虑运用刑法这最后一道屏障来发挥社会治理的效果。因此,《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》(以下简称为《刑法修正案(九)》新增拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪,即《刑法》第二百八十六条之一,对网络服务提供者违反信息网络安全管理义务,经监管部门责令采取改正措施拒不改正,情节严重的行为作了入罪规定。一方面为了净化网络环境,维护正常的网络秩序,刑法制定该罪具有立法上的扩张性。但另一方面本罪毕竟属于不作为犯罪,犯罪行为以不作为的方式呈现,在入罪判断中必须要谨慎,以免不当地扩大刑法的打击范围。在相关法律、法规还不完善的情况下,在认定构成拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的过程中,还存在一些疑难问题。例如,网络服务提供者具体都有哪些?网络服务提供者的范围通过何种方法来界定?网络服务提供者的信息网络安全管理义务又有哪些?主观方面属于故意还是过失等一系列问题的解决,都需要对法条进行合理审慎地解释,才能有效地防止打击面的随意扩大,从而保障人权。本文共分为四章。第一章通过研究分析,明确了拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪所保护的法益。第二章是对该罪客观构成要件中的存在争议的相关各要素进行了具体认定。第三章重点对该罪的主体范围进行了界定,并对本罪主体做了功能性的区分,进一步细化了不同网络服务提供主体的义务。第四章对该罪主观方面属于故意还是过失进行分析判断,并最终认定该罪主观方面属于故意。
[Abstract]:With the development of network technology, network crime accounts for more and more crimes. As a key link in the network operation chain, network service providers have assumed more and more legal obligations because of their technical superiority and advanced nature, and are playing a more and more important role in the process of cracking down on network crime. However, due to the imperfection of the criminal law on the criminal liability of network service providers, in practice, more and more network service providers fail to fulfill their network security management obligations. It is difficult to find a suitable legal basis for conviction and sentencing in the situation of serious consequences, so we have to consider the use of criminal law as the last barrier to bring into play the effect of social governance. Therefore, the Criminal Law Amendment (9) of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Law Amendment (9) adds the crime of refusing to perform the duty of managing information network security, that is, Article 286 of the Criminal Law, To the network service provider violates the information network security management obligation, after the supervision department orders to take the correction measure refuses to correct, the serious circumstance behavior has made the incrimination stipulation. On the one hand, in order to purify the network environment and maintain the normal network order, the criminal law formulation of the crime has legislative expansibility. But on the other hand, this crime is a crime of omission after all, the criminal behavior is presented in the form of omission, in the judgment of incrimination, we must be careful so as not to unreasonably expand the scope of the criminal law. Under the condition that the relevant laws and regulations are not perfect, there are still some difficult problems in the course of determining the crime of refusing to fulfill the duty of information network security management. For example, what are the network service providers? How can the scope of network service providers be defined? What are the network security management obligations of network service providers? To solve a series of problems, such as intentional or negligent, the subjective aspect needs to be interpreted reasonably and carefully in order to effectively prevent the random expansion of the attacking area and protect human rights. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter, through research and analysis, clarifies the legal benefits protected by the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management. The second chapter is to the objective elements of the crime of the existence of the relevant elements of the specific identification. The third chapter focuses on the definition of the scope of the main body of the crime, and makes a functional distinction to the main body of the crime, further refining the obligations of different network service providers. The fourth chapter analyzes whether the subjective aspect of the crime is intentional or negligent, and finally determines that the subjective aspect of the crime is intentional.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2367633
[Abstract]:With the development of network technology, network crime accounts for more and more crimes. As a key link in the network operation chain, network service providers have assumed more and more legal obligations because of their technical superiority and advanced nature, and are playing a more and more important role in the process of cracking down on network crime. However, due to the imperfection of the criminal law on the criminal liability of network service providers, in practice, more and more network service providers fail to fulfill their network security management obligations. It is difficult to find a suitable legal basis for conviction and sentencing in the situation of serious consequences, so we have to consider the use of criminal law as the last barrier to bring into play the effect of social governance. Therefore, the Criminal Law Amendment (9) of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Law Amendment (9) adds the crime of refusing to perform the duty of managing information network security, that is, Article 286 of the Criminal Law, To the network service provider violates the information network security management obligation, after the supervision department orders to take the correction measure refuses to correct, the serious circumstance behavior has made the incrimination stipulation. On the one hand, in order to purify the network environment and maintain the normal network order, the criminal law formulation of the crime has legislative expansibility. But on the other hand, this crime is a crime of omission after all, the criminal behavior is presented in the form of omission, in the judgment of incrimination, we must be careful so as not to unreasonably expand the scope of the criminal law. Under the condition that the relevant laws and regulations are not perfect, there are still some difficult problems in the course of determining the crime of refusing to fulfill the duty of information network security management. For example, what are the network service providers? How can the scope of network service providers be defined? What are the network security management obligations of network service providers? To solve a series of problems, such as intentional or negligent, the subjective aspect needs to be interpreted reasonably and carefully in order to effectively prevent the random expansion of the attacking area and protect human rights. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter, through research and analysis, clarifies the legal benefits protected by the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management. The second chapter is to the objective elements of the crime of the existence of the relevant elements of the specific identification. The third chapter focuses on the definition of the scope of the main body of the crime, and makes a functional distinction to the main body of the crime, further refining the obligations of different network service providers. The fourth chapter analyzes whether the subjective aspect of the crime is intentional or negligent, and finally determines that the subjective aspect of the crime is intentional.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李本灿;;拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的两面性解读[J];法学论坛;2017年03期
2 李永升;袁汉兴;;拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的理解与适用[J];宜宾学院学报;2017年02期
3 葛立刚;;网络服务商不作为刑事责任的边界[J];西南政法大学学报;2016年06期
4 敬力嘉;;非确定性背景下网络服务提供者的刑事归责——基于实行行为视角的思考[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2016年06期
5 刘艳红;;网络中立帮助行为可罚性的流变及批判——以德日的理论和实务为比较基准[J];法学评论;2016年05期
6 喻海松;;网络犯罪的立法扩张与司法适用[J];法律适用;2016年09期
7 王华伟;;网络服务提供者的刑法责任比较研究[J];环球法律评论;2016年04期
8 涂龙科;;网络内容管理义务与网络服务提供者的刑事责任[J];法学评论;2016年03期
9 郭泽强;张曼;;网络服务提供者刑事责任初论——以中立帮助行为的处罚为中心[J];预防青少年犯罪研究;2016年02期
10 于志刚;;网络空间中犯罪帮助行为的制裁体系与完善思路[J];中国法学;2016年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 花岳亮;涉网络服务提供者的共同犯罪问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
2 程亮;网络服务提供者的安全保障义务研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
3 幸江;论网络服务提供者的侵权责任[D];中国政法大学;2011年
4 岳亭;网络交易平台提供商法律责任研究[D];北方工业大学;2010年
5 邢君;网络中间服务商的侵权责任研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
，本文编号：2367633
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2367633.html
