治理理论视角下美国公立研究型大学制度研究
发布时间：2018-10-19 13:01
【摘要】：本文以美国公立研究型大学为研究对象,以治理理论为研究视角,着力从美国公立研究型大学制度的发展历程、治理结构主体、主体之间的权力关系、权力运行过程及其基本特征、制度保障体系、治理影响因素、治理面临的现实挑战以及对我国大学发展的启示等方面展开论述,试图比较清晰的呈现美国公立研究型大学制度的全景并给予深入的系统的解构。全文由绪论和6章内容构成,绪论论述了论文的研究缘起与价值、国内外研究进展与论文的研究方法;第一章探讨了治理理论体系与大学治理的理论分析框架,作为本文的理论基础;第二章将美国公立研究型大学的制度变迁划分为社会参与、国家控制和多元共治三个时期,分别围绕大学的治理理念、治理结构主体、权力运行过程及制度保障四个方面进行考察;第三章围绕公立研究型大学的治理模式给予了着重探讨,分为内部治理结构主体及其相互之间的权力关系、大学治理的权力运行过程以及大学治理的相关制度保障体系三个层次,其中,内部结构主体重点研究了董事会、校长团队和评议会等大学治理结构的顶层设置,将大学治理主体之间的权力关系概括为委托代理关系、分权制衡关系和共同治理关系,大学治理的权力运行过程则从权力的产生、权力的行使和权力的监督三个方面展开论述,大学治理的相关制度保障体系则从高等教育整体、大学之间以及大学自身三个层面进行考察;第四章研究了公立研究型大学制度的基本特征,从治理主体的多样性、治理基础的协调性、治理规则的持续性和治理趋势的公司化四个方面进行探讨;第五章从政府、市场、高等教育中介组织、公立研究型大学自身四个方面概括了美国公立研究型大学制度的影响因素;第六章论述了美国公立研究型大学制度发展过程中所面临的主要现实挑战,分别是行政与学术主体之间的矛盾、共同治理制度的功能性障碍、以共治关系中的教师参与不足;最后用研究获得的美国经验提出针对我国高等教育发展的一些建议。通过深入研究美国公立研究型大学的治理结构和权力运行方式,全面考察其在面临外界强力干预和内部改革缓慢等挑战下的制度性回应;能够更加深刻的理解美国公立研究型大学在享有大学自治权力与承担公共服务之间的均衡,其优异的学术表现与庞大的公共服务功能是其治理结构逐渐健全的必然结果。然而,这种借用将公立研究型大学全面推向市场办学的方式来缓解其发展面临的财政不充足困境的治理模式,是否会对公立研究型大学赖以生存的学术研究活动的未来产生不利影响还有待后续考察。
[Abstract]:This article takes the American public research university as the research object, takes the governance theory as the research angle, and focuses on the development course of the American public research university system, the power relation between the main body of the governance structure and the main body. The process of power operation and its basic characteristics, the system of system guarantee, the influencing factors of governance, the realistic challenges of governance and the enlightenment to the development of universities in China are discussed. This paper attempts to present the panorama of American public research university system and to deconstruct it deeply. The thesis is composed of introduction and six chapters. The introduction discusses the origin and value of the thesis, the research progress at home and abroad and the research methods of the thesis. The first chapter discusses the theoretical system of governance and the theoretical analysis framework of university governance. As the theoretical basis of this paper, the second chapter divides the institutional changes of American public research universities into three periods: social participation, state control and pluralistic co-governance, which respectively revolve around the governance concept and governance structure of the university. The third chapter focuses on the governance model of public research universities, which is divided into the main body of internal governance structure and the power relationship between them. There are three levels of the power operation process of university governance and the relevant institutional guarantee system of university governance. The main body of internal structure focuses on the top-level setting of the governing structure of the university, such as the board of directors, the presidents' team and the consultative council. The power relationship between the subjects of university governance is summarized as the principal-agent relationship, the separation of powers and checks and balances, and the common governance relationship. The power operation process of university governance is discussed from three aspects: the generation of power, the exercise of power and the supervision of power. The related institutional guarantee system of university governance is investigated from three levels of higher education, between universities and universities themselves. Chapter four studies the basic characteristics of the public research university system, from the diversity of governance subjects. The coordination of governance foundation, the sustainability of governance rules and the corporatization of governance trend are discussed in the fifth chapter from the government, market, higher education intermediary organizations, Four aspects of the public research universities themselves generalize the influencing factors of the public research university system in the United States, the sixth chapter discusses the main realistic challenges in the development of the public research university system in the United States. They are the contradictions between the administrative and academic subjects, the functional obstacles of the common governance system, and the insufficient participation of teachers in the co-governance relationship. Finally, some suggestions for the development of higher education in China are put forward with the American experience obtained from the research. Through in-depth study of the governance structure and power operation mode of public research universities in the United States, the institutional response under the challenges of external strong intervention and slow internal reform is comprehensively investigated. To understand the balance between the university autonomy and the public service, the excellent academic performance and the huge public service function of the public research university is the inevitable result of the gradual improvement of the governance structure of the public research university in the United States. However, this kind of governance model, which borrows the way that public research universities are fully marketed to run schools in order to alleviate the financial inadequacies they face in their development, Whether it will have a negative impact on the future of the academic research activities on which public research universities depend remains to be investigated.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G649.712
本文编号：2281191
[Abstract]:This article takes the American public research university as the research object, takes the governance theory as the research angle, and focuses on the development course of the American public research university system, the power relation between the main body of the governance structure and the main body. The process of power operation and its basic characteristics, the system of system guarantee, the influencing factors of governance, the realistic challenges of governance and the enlightenment to the development of universities in China are discussed. This paper attempts to present the panorama of American public research university system and to deconstruct it deeply. The thesis is composed of introduction and six chapters. The introduction discusses the origin and value of the thesis, the research progress at home and abroad and the research methods of the thesis. The first chapter discusses the theoretical system of governance and the theoretical analysis framework of university governance. As the theoretical basis of this paper, the second chapter divides the institutional changes of American public research universities into three periods: social participation, state control and pluralistic co-governance, which respectively revolve around the governance concept and governance structure of the university. The third chapter focuses on the governance model of public research universities, which is divided into the main body of internal governance structure and the power relationship between them. There are three levels of the power operation process of university governance and the relevant institutional guarantee system of university governance. The main body of internal structure focuses on the top-level setting of the governing structure of the university, such as the board of directors, the presidents' team and the consultative council. The power relationship between the subjects of university governance is summarized as the principal-agent relationship, the separation of powers and checks and balances, and the common governance relationship. The power operation process of university governance is discussed from three aspects: the generation of power, the exercise of power and the supervision of power. The related institutional guarantee system of university governance is investigated from three levels of higher education, between universities and universities themselves. Chapter four studies the basic characteristics of the public research university system, from the diversity of governance subjects. The coordination of governance foundation, the sustainability of governance rules and the corporatization of governance trend are discussed in the fifth chapter from the government, market, higher education intermediary organizations, Four aspects of the public research universities themselves generalize the influencing factors of the public research university system in the United States, the sixth chapter discusses the main realistic challenges in the development of the public research university system in the United States. They are the contradictions between the administrative and academic subjects, the functional obstacles of the common governance system, and the insufficient participation of teachers in the co-governance relationship. Finally, some suggestions for the development of higher education in China are put forward with the American experience obtained from the research. Through in-depth study of the governance structure and power operation mode of public research universities in the United States, the institutional response under the challenges of external strong intervention and slow internal reform is comprehensively investigated. To understand the balance between the university autonomy and the public service, the excellent academic performance and the huge public service function of the public research university is the inevitable result of the gradual improvement of the governance structure of the public research university in the United States. However, this kind of governance model, which borrows the way that public research universities are fully marketed to run schools in order to alleviate the financial inadequacies they face in their development, Whether it will have a negative impact on the future of the academic research activities on which public research universities depend remains to be investigated.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G649.712
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李澄;;元治理理论综述[J];前沿;2013年21期
2 张应强;;全球化背景下的我国现代大学制度改革[J];高等教育研究;2013年09期
3 埃里克汉斯·克莱恩;基普·柯本让;程熙;郑寰;;治理网络理论:过去、现在和未来[J];国家行政学院学报;2013年03期
4 刘献君;;中国特色现代大学制度建设的思考[J];中国高等教育;2012年24期
5 刘爱生;;解读美国大学的不信任投票——以哈佛大学前校长拉里·萨默斯的不信任案为例[J];比较教育研究;2012年11期
6 刘学坤;崔艳丽;;源起和去向:西方大学公共性的现代转型[J];教育导刊;2012年09期
7 张杰;;以高度的文化自觉和文化自信推动大学文化建设[J];求是;2012年09期
8 德里克·博克;曲铭峰;;大学的治理[J];高等教育研究;2012年04期
9 王长乐;;大学制度改革目标探析[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年01期
10 赵俊芳;李国良;;美国大学商业化寻理[J];江苏高教;2011年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 吕慎;;用现代大学制度实现高校社会职能[N];光明日报;2001年
，本文编号：2281191
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/2281191.html
