当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 社科博士论文 >

The Exercise of Jurisdiction of the International Criminal C

发布时间:2021-04-06 04:08
  两次世界大战的出现,引起国际上对那些战争罪、反人类罪等侵犯人类和摧毁成千上万无辜市民生活的国际犯罪,展开了严厉的打击。为此,国际社会迫切需要在国际层面上的正义、安全与和平。因此,国际社会朝着建立一个永久的国际层面上的司法制度而努力,尤其是在国际社会中的引人关注的严重刑事案件;如反人类罪、战争罪、侵略罪和种族灭绝罪,国际正义应该保证无论在何种政治利益情况下,都必须能够独立起诉肇事者的罪行。一开始,国际社会的目标是建立特殊的国际临时刑事法庭,对在第一和第二次世界大战的战犯进行审理。然而,它们的决心远非如此,国际法的学者在2002年试图建立一个永久的法院,裁决违反国际人道主义法的犯罪,由此国际刑事法院诞生,(缩写为“ICC”)。国际刑事法院主要是对各国国内司法制度进行补充,当然国际刑事法庭也不能充当各国国内法院的角色,它需要国内法院的意愿或能力对这些罪行进行调查或起诉。国际刑事法院是以通过终结有罪不罚等违规行为,威慑那些打算违反国际人道主义法人等的方式来处理问题的。国际刑事法庭是第一个独立永久性刑事法庭,是国际社会为惩罚战争罪犯和实施者以及反人类罪、种族灭绝罪的暴行而创立的。国际刑事法院的《... 

【文章来源】:湖南大学湖南省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】:203 页

【学位级别】:博士

【文章目录】:
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION
    1.1 BACKGROUND
    1.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY
    1.3 CENTRAL QUESTIONS
    1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY
    1.5 LITERATURE AVAILABLE IN THE FIELD
    1.6 METHODS AND SOURCES OF RESEARCH
CHAPTER II: THE CIRCUMSTANCES TO ESTABLISH ICC AND THEROLE OF ARAB STATE
    SECTION 1: CREATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
        2.1.1. Pre-World War II
        2.1.2. The Nuremberg and Tokyo trials
        2.1.3. The Cold War Stall
        2.1.4. The ad hoc tribunals
        2.1.5. Drafting of the ICC Statute
        Conclusion
    SECTION 2: THE ROLE OF ARAB STATES IN CREATION AND EVOLUTION OF ICC
        2.2.1. The Involvement of Arab Countries in Developing ICC
        2.2.2. The League of Arab States
        2.2.3. The Effects of Arab Spring to Development of the Arab Position from the ICC.27Conclusion
        Conclusion
CHAPTER III: THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONALCRIMINAL COURT
    SECTION 1: TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
    SECTION 2: PERSONAL JURISDICTION
    SECTION 3: TEMPORAL JURISDICTION
        3.3.1. The 1st July 2002 at the earliest
        3.3.2. Or from the date of the Statute coming into force for any particular State Party, if later (under the 60 day rule)
        3.3.3. Or from the date of declaration under Article 12 (3)
    SECTION 4: SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION
        3.4.1. The Crime of Genocide
            3.4.1.1. Elements of the Crime of Genocide
                3.4.1.1.1. Killing members of the group
                3.4.1.1.2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
                3.4.1.1.3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bringabout its physical destruction in whole or in part
                3.4.1.1.4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
                3.4.1.1.5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
        3.4.2. Crimes against humanity
            3.4.2.1. Crime against humanity of murder
            3.4.2.2. Crime against humanity of extermination
            3.4.2.3. Crime against humanity of enslavement
            3.4.2.4. Crime against humanity of deportation or forcible transfer of population
            3.4.2.5. Crime against humanity of imprisonment or other severe deprivation ofphysical liberty
            3.4.2.6. Crime against humanity of torture
            3.4.2.7. Crime against humanity of Rape and other violence
                A. Rape
                B. Sexual slavery
                C. Enforced prostitution
                D. Crime against humanity of forced pregnancy
                E. Enforced sterilization as one of the crimes against humanity
                F. Sexual violence as crime against humanity
            2.4.2.8. Crime against humanity of persecution
            3.4.2.9. Crime against humanity of enforced disappearance of persons
            3.4.2.10. Crime against humanity of apartheid
            3.4.2.11. Crime against humanity of other inhumane acts
        3.4.3. War crimes
        3.4.4. THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION
            3.4.4.1 The Kampala Definition of the Crime of Aggression
            3.4.4.2 The effect of opt-in and opt-out provisions
    Conclusion
CHAPTER IV: THE APPLICATION OF ICC JURISDICTION ON ARABSTATES
    Section 1: Sudan
        4.1.1. The root causes of the Darfur crisis
        4.1.2. Escalation of the violence and the UNSC involvement in the Darfur crisis
        4.1.3. The referral of the Darfur situation to the ICC jurisdiction
        4.1.4 The Legitimacy of the Security Council Referral of the Situation in Darfur to the ICC
        4.1.5. The Jurisdiction of International Criminal Court on the Conflict
            4.1.5.1. Personal Jurisdiction
            4.1.5.2. Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
                4.1.5.2.1. Crime of genocide
                4.1.5.2.2. Crimes against Humanity
                4.1.5.2.3. Crime of War.
        4.1.6. The Challenges facing the ICC to Exercise its Jurisdiction in Darfur
            4.1.6.1 Lack of states cooperation under UNSC Resolution 1593
            4.1.6.2. Negative Role of United Nation and UN Security Council
            4.1.6.3. How the Sudanese Government has coped with the Darfur Conflict
            4.1.6.4. The immunity
            4.1.6.5. Conflict between the ICC and the AU
        Conclusion
    Section 2: Libya
        4.2.1. The Libyan Crisis: From a Domestic Crisis to a matter under International Jurisdiction of ICC
        4.2.2. Judicial Developments of The Libya ISSUE
            4.2.2.1. The Security Council Refer Libya to ICC
            4.2.2.2. Opening of the Investigation and Warrants of Arrest
            4.2.2.3. The exercise of jurisdiction of ICC in the case of Libya
        4.2.3. The relation between complementary principle and Libyan courts
        4.2.4. Behind the failure of jurisdiction of ICC in case of Libya
            4.2.4.1. Libya refused to hand the suspects over to the ICC
                4.2.4.1.1. In case of Abdullah Al-Senussi
                4.2.4.1.2 Case of Saif Al-Islam Qaddafi.
                    4.2.4.1.2.1. Ongoing investigation by national court
                    4.2.4.1.2.2. The Same Person, Same Conduct Test
                    4.2.4.1.2.3. Criterion of “Unwillingness” and “inability”
            4.2.4.2. The ICC referred to UNSC the non-cooperation of Libya
        Conclusion
    Section 3: Iraq
        4.3.1. The subject- matter Jurisdiction of ICC on the crimes committed in Iraq
            4.3.1.1. Aggression crime
            4.3.1.2. War crimes
            4.3.1.3. Crime against Humanity
            4.3.1.4. Crime of Genocide
        4.3.2. The extent of the ICC jurisdiction in crimes committed in Iraq
            4.3.2.1. The possibility of presenting the American soldiers to ICC
            4.3.2.2. The possibility of presenting the British soldiers to ICC.
        4.3.3. Illegality of ICC to Refuse to Prosecute Allied Troops on 2006
        Conclusion
    Section 4: Palestine
        4.4.1. The ICC between realizing the aim of Statute and the crimes committed in Palestine
            4.4.1.1. Mechanism of ICC to have jurisdiction over Palestine
            4.4.1.2. Rationale supporting exercise of jurisdiction over crimes committed in Palestine
                4.4.1.2.1. Palestine before recognizing the jurisdiction of ICC
                    4.4.1.2.1.1. The temporal Jurisdiction
                        4.4.1.2.1.1.1. Direct Impact
                        4.4.1.2.1.1.2. Retroactive impact
                4.4.1.2.2. Palestine after recognizing the ICC jurisdiction
        4.4.2. Are the crimes committed in Palestine falling into the ICC jurisdiction?
            4.4.2.1. War crimes
            4.4.2.2. Genocide
            4.4.2.3. Crimes against humanity
        4.4.3. The bar on ICC to prosecute the perpetrators of the crimes committed in Palestine
        Conclusion
Chapter V: The ICC Jurisdiction Challenges in Arab States
    Section 1: The lack of an effective enforcement mechanism for ICC
    Section 2: The complementary jurisdiction of ICC
    Section 3: The Immunity Challenge
    Section 4: Respecting Sovereignty and balancing it with Cooperation
        5.4.1. Lack of cooperation by party states to the statute
        5.4.2. Lack of cooperation by non- party states to the statute
    Section 5: The Security Council’s impact on ICC resolutions
        5.5.1. Economic and Political Interests
        5.5.2. The application of article 16 of Rome Statute by UNSC
Chapter VI : The extent of success of ICC to exercise its jurisdiction over Arab States
    Section 1: Research Findings
        6.1.1 The prosecutions are limited to Arab-African countries
        6.1.2 Limitation over ICC’s Jurisdiction regarding serious crimes
        6.1.3 The factor of sovereignty in acceding to Rome Statute
        6.1.4 Restricting the ICC jurisdiction by UNSC
        6.1.5 Non-compliance of court orders by member states
        6.1.6 Challenges of Legitimacy for International Criminal Court
Bibliography
    I. Articles
    II. Reports, Resolutions and judgments
    III. Textbooks
    IV. Website
    V. Conventions , agreements and others



本文编号:3120729

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/3120729.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e1ec4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com