注意指向对道德概念垂直空间隐喻一致性效应的影响
本文选题:道德 切入点:垂直空间 出处:《河北大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:道德概念隐喻的相关研究,一定程度上说明了道德概念隐喻的心理现实性,但对于道德概念与垂直空间启动关系的结论并不一致。有研究发现概念表征的映射是单向的,也有研究发现概念表征的映射是双向的,而两个方向的联结强度是不对称的。本研究通过启动实验范式,探讨道德概念对垂直空间的启动,以及垂直空间对道德概念的启动。两个实验分别控制目标刺激的注意指向,探讨在不同注意指向条件下,概念隐喻一致性效应的区别,进而揭示道德概念与垂直空间之间的映射关系是否是对称的,以及这种映射关系的神经电生理机制。实验1分别采用不指向空间(字母判断)和指向空间(空间位置判断)的任务,探讨从道德概念到垂直空间的启动效应。实验结果发现,在不指向空间的任务中,一致性条件(道德—上、不道德—下)与不一致性条件(道德—下、不道德—上)被试判断的反应时无差异,诱发的ERP成分无差异;在指向空间任务中,一致性条件下被试判断得更快,不一致性条件下占用了更多的认知资源,诱发了更大的P300。实验2分别采用指向道德(道德效价判断)与不指向道德(字体判断)的任务,探讨从垂直空间到道德概念的启动效应。实验结果发现,在指向道德的任务中,一致性条件下在“道德—上”这一维度被试的判断更快,一致性条件诱发更大的P200,目标刺激探测更快,不一致条件下诱发了更大的N400,语义违反程度更强;在不指向道德的任务中,一致性条件与不一致性条件被试判断的反应时无差异,诱发的ERP成分无差异。综合两个实验结果表明,道德概念与垂直空间之间存在双向启动关系,但这种启动关系会受到注意指向的影响,支持了协同工作模型(Coherent Working Models,CWM)的假设。
[Abstract]:To some extent, the study of moral conceptual metaphor illustrates the psychological reality of moral conceptual metaphor, but the conclusion of the relationship between moral concept and vertical spatial priming is inconsistent. Some studies have found that the mapping of conceptual representation is unidirectional. Some studies have also found that the mapping of conceptual representation is bidirectional, and the intensity of connection between the two directions is asymmetric. And the initiation of moral concept in vertical space. The two experiments respectively controlled the attention direction of target stimulus, and explored the difference of the consistency effect of conceptual metaphor under different attention points. And then reveal whether the mapping relationship between moral concepts and vertical space is symmetric, In experiment 1, the priming effect from moral concept to vertical space was discussed by using the tasks of not pointing to space (alphabetical judgment) and pointing to space (spatial position judgment), respectively. In the task that does not point to space, there is no difference in the reaction time between the consistency condition (moral-upper, immoral-lower) and the inconsistent condition (moral-lower, immoral-upper), and there is no difference in the induced ERP component; In the task of pointing to space, the subjects judged more quickly under the condition of consistency, and occupied more cognitive resources under the condition of inconsistency. In experiment 2, the priming effect from vertical space to moral concept was explored by using the task of pointing to morality (moral value judgment) and not pointing to morality (font judgment). Under the condition of consistency, the subjects' judgment is faster in the dimension of "moral-upper", the consistency condition induces a larger P200, the target stimulus detects faster, the inconsistent condition induces a larger N400, and the degree of semantic violation is stronger. In the task that does not point to morality, there is no difference in the reaction time between the consistency condition and the inconsistent condition, and there is no difference in the induced ERP component. The two experimental results show that there is a bidirectional priming relationship between the moral concept and the vertical space. However, this startup relationship is influenced by attention points, supporting the hypothesis of a cooperative work model, coherence Working models (CWM).
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B842.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鲁忠义;贾利宁;翟冬雪;;道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性[J];心理学报;2017年02期
2 武向慈;王恩国;;权力概念加工对视觉空间注意定向的影响:一个ERP证据[J];心理学报;2014年12期
3 殷融;叶浩生;;道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响[J];心理学报;2014年09期
4 王锃;鲁忠义;;道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响[J];心理学报;2013年05期
5 吕军梅;鲁忠义;;为什么快乐在“上”,悲伤在“下”——语篇阅读中情绪的垂直空间隐喻[J];心理科学;2013年02期
6 殷融;苏得权;叶浩生;;具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论[J];心理科学进展;2013年02期
7 叶浩生;;具身认知、镜像神经元与身心关系[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2012年03期
8 叶浩生;;有关具身认知思潮的理论心理学思考[J];心理学报;2011年05期
9 李其维;;“认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议[J];心理学报;2008年12期
10 齐振海;彭聃龄;;第三代认知科学下的语言研究[J];中国外语;2007年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 顾倩;道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理现实性[D];河北大学;2015年
2 贾利宁;道德概念垂直空间隐喻映射的双向性[D];河北师范大学;2014年
3 常晶晶;情绪具身观:来自ERP和fMRI的证据[D];西南大学;2013年
,本文编号:1684369
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/1684369.html