当代中国的文学伦理学批评研究

发布时间：2018-07-18 14:11

【摘要】：20世纪80年代末,西方文学伦理批评出现回归热潮,但这次的复兴不是要回到传统意义上的批评,也不是对道德批评的重申,而是对形式主义文论的反驳,是对文学作为一种认知方式的重新定位。到新世纪初,我国文学批评界也出现了文学的伦理批评转向。在发展的十余年间,它以伦理选择为理论基础,提出了一系列批评核心术语。实践运用显著增加,采用该批评方法为视角分析文学作品的文章也在逐年递增。但与其他批评方法相比,该批评方法在我国起步较晚,发展较慢,显现出一定的问题。例如:伦理批评与道德批评概念不清,直接导致批评实践的混用与乱用,标榜运用了该方法的文章实际上依旧是传统道德批评的产物,而批评者却并不自知;伦理和教诲的混淆,使教诲和审美的两极对立变成伦理和审美的对立,使该批评方法朝向极端方向发展;批评实践的误用和过度阐释,相似命题的低水平复制的现象也逐渐显现。该批评方法为我国文学批评提供了新视角、新思路,但在未来的发展过程中,我国学者和相关研究者们仍然需要继续完善理论体系,厘清相关概念,不断拓展实践运用的广度和深度,处理、解决好该批评方法出现的问题。在我国今后的发展中,这个具有多元性和包容性的批评方法必然会不断显现其强大的生命力与创造性。
[Abstract]:At the end of the 1980s, the western literary ethics criticism returned to the upsurge, but the revival was not to return to the traditional criticism, nor to the reaffirmation of the moral criticism, but to refute the formalism literary theory. It is the reorientation of literature as a cognitive way. At the beginning of the new century, the literary criticism circle also appeared the literary ethics criticism turn. In the ten years of development, it put forward a series of critical core terms on the basis of ethical choice. The use of practice has increased significantly, and the number of articles used to analyze literary works from the perspective of this critical method is increasing year by year. However, compared with other critical methods, this method starts late and develops slowly in our country, showing some problems. For example, the concept of ethical criticism and moral criticism is not clear, which directly leads to the mixed use and misuse of criticism practice, and the articles that claim to use this method are still the product of traditional moral criticism, but the critics do not know themselves; The confusion between ethics and instruction makes the bipolar opposition between education and aesthetics become the opposite of ethics and aesthetics, and makes the method of criticism develop in the extreme direction; the misuse and over-interpretation of criticism practice, The phenomenon of low-level replication of similar propositions also gradually appears. This method of criticism provides a new perspective and a new way of thinking for literary criticism in China. However, in the process of future development, Chinese scholars and related researchers still need to continue to improve the theoretical system and clarify the relevant concepts. Continue to expand the scope and depth of practical use, deal with, and solve the problems arising from this critical method. In the future development of our country, this pluralistic and inclusive criticism method will continue to show its strong vitality and creativity.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I06

【参考文献】