归化异化视角下《雷雨》两个英译本的比较研究

发布时间：2018-11-01 15:13

【摘要】：《雷雨》是我国戏剧走向成熟的标志,曾在不同时期有过两次英文译介,分别是1936年《天下》(T'ienHsiaMonthly)月刊刊载的姚克版和1958年外文出版社出版的王佐良、巴恩斯版。总体而言,姚译本多采用异化,在翻译文本的同时将中国的文化特色也一并引入。而王译本则多采用归化,译者向译入语读者靠拢,在英文中寻找源语概念的对应词,减轻译入语读者阅读压力。归化异化之争由来己久,但两种翻译策略并非对立,出于不同的翻译目的,均可为译者所用。笔者比较分析两个英译本之后得到启发:归化、异化无需分出优劣高下,译者可依据不同的作者意图、翻译目的、文本类型和读者对象等因素做出选择。归化、异化虽看似对立,但其实是统一、互为补充的。翻译过程中,最为重要的是译者具有文化传递的意识,无论是选择归化还是异化,译者都应本着文化交流的目的帮助译入语读者接受、理解源语文化。
[Abstract]:Thunderstorm is a sign of the maturation of Chinese drama. It has been translated twice in English in different periods, namely Yao Ke edition published in (T'ienHsiaMonthly) monthly in 1936 and Wang Zuoliang and Barnes edition published by Foreign language Publishing House in 1958. In general, Yao's version is mostly foreignized, and the Chinese cultural features are also introduced into the translation. On the other hand, Wang's translation adopts domestication, and the translator draws closer to the target reader, seeking corresponding words of the source concept in English, so as to lighten the reading pressure of the target reader. The dispute over domestication has a long history, but the two translation strategies are not antagonistic and can be used by translators for different purposes. The author is inspired by comparative analysis of the two English versions: domestication, alienation does not need to distinguish the advantages and disadvantages, the translator can make a choice according to different author's intention, translation purpose, text type and the target of the reader and so on. Domestication, alienation, although seemingly opposite, but in fact is unified, complementary to each other. In the process of translation, the most important thing is that the translator has the consciousness of cultural transmission. No matter whether he chooses to domesticate or dissimilate, the translator should help the target readers to accept and understand the source culture with the aim of cultural exchange.
【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H315.9

【相似文献】