话语标记语在中国非英语专业大学生议论文中的使用研究
发布时间:2024-06-02 00:41
近年来学者愈发关注语篇分析中的衔接与连贯的研究,话语标记语被认为是一种衔接手段也备受关注。本文以话语标记语的使用是语用能力的体现为理据,根据Fraser提出的话语标记语分类,在语料库研究理论和方法指导下,旨在探究中国非英语专业大学生在英语议论文写作中话语标记语的使用情况。通过对比研究,考察中国非英语专业大学生和英国本族语使用者的大学生在英语议论文中使用话语标记语方面的异同,期望对中国英语写作教学提供一些建议。本文采用中介语对比分析方法和语料库的研究方法,结合定量分析和定性分析,以CLEC中的子语料库为实验语料库,以LOCNESS中的子语料库为参照语料库,使用语料检索工具AntConc 3.4.3w和Log-likelihood ratio calculator等其它分析工具,分析话语标记语在中国非英语专业大学生和英国本族语使用者的大学生的英语议论文中的使用情况。本文根据Fraser对话语标记语的分类,在两个子语料库中分别提取相应的话语标记语,首先探究话语标记语的整体使用情况,然后对推导性话语标记语、阐发性话语标记语和对比性话语标记语这三类话语标记语进行探究,最后探究67个话语标记语在两...
【文章页数】:63 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Significance and Necessity of the Study
1.3 Purpose of the Study
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
2 Literature Review
2.1 Terminological Diversity of DMs
2.2 Definitions of DMs
2.3 Characteristics of DMs
2.3.1 Connectivity
2.3.2 Optionality
2.3.3 Non-truth-conditionality
2.4 Classifications of DMs
2.4.1 Schiffrin’s Classification
2.4.2 Fraser’s Classification
2.4.3 Classification Suggested by Blakemore
2.5 Functions of DMs in Written Discourse
2.5.1 Local Coherence
2.5.2 Global Coherence
2.6 The Studies on DMs
2.6.1 Semantic -pragmatic Approach
2.6.2 Syntactic-pragmatic Approach
2.6.3 Cognitive-pragmatic Approach
2.7 The Studies on the Use and Acquisition of DMs
2.8 Theoretical Basis
3 Methodology
3.1 Research Questions
3.2 Methods for Corpus-based Study
3.2.1 Corpus-based Approach
3.2.2 Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods
3.2.3 Contrastive Interlangaue Analysis
3.3 Corpora Used in the Present Study
3.4 Tools
3.4.1 Detagging Software
3.4.2 The Concordance Software
3.4.3 Statistical Tools
3.5 Data Collection
3.6 Data Analysis
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 The General Characteristics of DMs in the Mini CLEC
4.1.1 The Overall Frequency and Distribution of DMs
4.1.2 The Frequencies and Distribution of Types of DMs
4.2 The General Characteristics of DMs in the Mini LOCNESS
4.2.1 The Overall Frequency and Distribution of DMs
4.2.2 The Frequencies and Distribution of Types of DMs
4.3 Comparisons of DMs in the Two Mini Corpora
4.3.1 Comparisons of Overall Frequency and Distribution of Types of DMs
4.3.2 Detailed Information on Comparisons of DMs
4.4 The Underused and Overused DMs in the Mini CLEC
4.4.1 The Benchmark of Underused and Overused of DMs
4.4.2 The Analysis of Underused and Overused DMs
4.5 The Misused DMs in the Mini CLEC
4.6 The Possible Factors for Contribution to Underuse, Overuse and Misuse
4.6.1 Lack of Input
4.6.2 Language Transfer
4.6.3 Test-related Influence
5 Conclusion
5.1 Major Findings
5.2 Pedagogical Implications
5.3 Limitations of the Study
5.4 Suggestions for Further Research
Reference
Acknowledgements
本文编号:3986605
【文章页数】:63 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Significance and Necessity of the Study
1.3 Purpose of the Study
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
2 Literature Review
2.1 Terminological Diversity of DMs
2.2 Definitions of DMs
2.3 Characteristics of DMs
2.3.1 Connectivity
2.3.2 Optionality
2.3.3 Non-truth-conditionality
2.4 Classifications of DMs
2.4.1 Schiffrin’s Classification
2.4.2 Fraser’s Classification
2.4.3 Classification Suggested by Blakemore
2.5 Functions of DMs in Written Discourse
2.5.1 Local Coherence
2.5.2 Global Coherence
2.6 The Studies on DMs
2.6.1 Semantic -pragmatic Approach
2.6.2 Syntactic-pragmatic Approach
2.6.3 Cognitive-pragmatic Approach
2.7 The Studies on the Use and Acquisition of DMs
2.8 Theoretical Basis
3 Methodology
3.1 Research Questions
3.2 Methods for Corpus-based Study
3.2.1 Corpus-based Approach
3.2.2 Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods
3.2.3 Contrastive Interlangaue Analysis
3.3 Corpora Used in the Present Study
3.4 Tools
3.4.1 Detagging Software
3.4.2 The Concordance Software
3.4.3 Statistical Tools
3.5 Data Collection
3.6 Data Analysis
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 The General Characteristics of DMs in the Mini CLEC
4.1.1 The Overall Frequency and Distribution of DMs
4.1.2 The Frequencies and Distribution of Types of DMs
4.2 The General Characteristics of DMs in the Mini LOCNESS
4.2.1 The Overall Frequency and Distribution of DMs
4.2.2 The Frequencies and Distribution of Types of DMs
4.3 Comparisons of DMs in the Two Mini Corpora
4.3.1 Comparisons of Overall Frequency and Distribution of Types of DMs
4.3.2 Detailed Information on Comparisons of DMs
4.4 The Underused and Overused DMs in the Mini CLEC
4.4.1 The Benchmark of Underused and Overused of DMs
4.4.2 The Analysis of Underused and Overused DMs
4.5 The Misused DMs in the Mini CLEC
4.6 The Possible Factors for Contribution to Underuse, Overuse and Misuse
4.6.1 Lack of Input
4.6.2 Language Transfer
4.6.3 Test-related Influence
5 Conclusion
5.1 Major Findings
5.2 Pedagogical Implications
5.3 Limitations of the Study
5.4 Suggestions for Further Research
Reference
Acknowledgements
本文编号:3986605
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/3986605.html
教材专著