当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 农业硕士论文 >

水分胁迫对豌豆生理生化的影响

发布时间:2018-05-26 14:54

  本文选题:豌豆 + 生理特性 ; 参考:《沈阳农业大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着人类对粮用及菜用豌豆的需求日益增大,我国豌豆种植面积逐渐增大,北方是豌豆主产区之一。近年来,我国北方地区旱情频繁发生,水资源短缺日益加重。选育豌豆抗旱品种是应对恶劣的干旱环境,提高豌豆质量和产量,高效利用水资源重要措施之一。本实验以麻豌豆等7种豌豆为试验材料,采用盆栽土培人工控水法,研究了干旱胁迫对豌豆生长的影响,筛选抗旱豌豆品种并探讨其抗旱生理生化机制,在此基础上,研究了豌豆肌动蛋白异型体PEAc3在干旱胁迫下的差异性表达,探讨其作为抗旱分子标记用于豌豆分子育种的可行性。主要结果如下:1.研究了水分胁迫对豌豆生长的影响。结果表明:苗期和花期水分胁迫均会使豌豆株高降低,叶片数减少,主根伸长及侧根数增多。苗期干旱胁迫后复水,随着复水天数增加,主根长度和侧根数逐渐接近对照植株,而株高和叶片数与对照植株的差异则逐渐变大。花期干旱胁迫后复水,随着复水天数增加,上述指标与对照植株的差异变小。其中,品种7受到干旱胁迫的影响最大,苗期干旱胁迫处理后,其主根比对照长15.44%,侧根数多10.71%,干旱胁迫后复水30天,其株高比对照低32.11%,叶片数低34.29%,因此,品种7是干旱敏感品种,而品种1是相对抗旱的豌豆品种。2.研究了水分胁迫对豌豆叶片MDA、SOD和P0D的影响。结果表明:苗期和花期干旱胁迫均导致丙二醛(Malondialdehyde,MDA)含量增加,超氧化物歧化酶(Superoxidase Dismutase,S0D)活性下降,过氧化物酶(Peroxidase,POD)活性增高。干旱敏感品种受到干旱胁迫的伤害较大,而抗旱品种受到的伤害相对较小。如花期水分胁迫处理,品种1叶片MDA含量比对照组提高19.69%,品种7叶片中MDA含量增加23.24%。品种1中SOD活性比对照组降低11.76%,品种7中S0D活性比对照降低19.26%。品种1的P0D活性增加47.13%,品种7中POD活性则增加23.24%。3.研究了水分胁迫对豌豆叶片叶绿素,可溶性蛋白,脯氨酸,可溶性糖含量的影响。结果表明:干旱胁迫对不同品种叶绿素含量的影响不同,苗期干旱后复水,与正常供水相比,品种1叶绿素总量增加41.08%,而品种7叶绿素总量只增加0.11%。苗期干旱处理后可溶性蛋白减少,复水10天后可溶性蛋白增加,品种1可溶性蛋白增加18.39%,品种7中蛋白增加25.00%。花期干旱处理后可溶性蛋白增加,复水10天后增加量减少,品种1中蛋白增加7.8%,品种7中蛋白增加22.66%。苗期和花期干旱胁迫均导致豌豆叶片中脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量增加。如花期干旱处理后,品种1中脯氨酸提高21.54%,品种7中脯氨酸增加24.90%。品种1中可溶性糖提高38.78%,品种7中可溶性糖提高0.72%。4.使用半定量RT-PCR分析了不同豌豆品种苗期干旱胁迫下肌动蛋白异型体3(Pea actinisoform3,PEAc3)的表达差异性。结果表明:干旱胁迫条件下,不同品种中PEAc3表达量变化不同。品种1中PEAc3表达量明显增加,而品种7中PEAc3表达量则明显下降。因此,PEAc3有可能作为分子标记来分析干旱对豌豆的伤害程度,也可能用于抗旱豌豆品种的分子筛选。
[Abstract]:With the increasing demand for food and vegetable peas, the area of pea growing in China is increasing gradually, and the north is one of the main producing areas of pea. In recent years, drought frequently occurs in northern China and the shortage of water resources is becoming more and more serious. One of the important resource measures. In this experiment, 7 varieties of pea, such as pea pea, were used as experimental materials, and the effect of drought stress on the growth of pea was studied by pot culture artificial water control method, and the physiological and biochemical mechanism of drought resistant pea resistance was screened and its drought resistance mechanism was discussed. On this basis, the difference of PEAc3 of pea actin isoform under drought stress was studied. The main results were as follows: 1. the effects of water stress on the growth of pea were studied. The results showed that the height of the pea was reduced, the number of leaves decreased, the length of the main root and the number of lateral roots increased. The length of the main root and the number of lateral roots gradually approached the control plant, but the difference of plant height and leaf number with the control plant gradually increased. After the drought stress, the difference between the index and the control plant was smaller. Among them, 7 was affected most by drought stress, and the drought stress was treated at the seedling stage. The main root was 15.44% longer than that of the control, and the lateral root was more than 10.71%. After drought stress, the rehydration was 30 days, the plant height was 32.11% lower than the control, and the leaf number was 34.29%. Therefore, the variety 7 was a drought sensitive variety, and the variety 1 was the relative drought resistant pea variety.2.. The effects of water stress on MDA, SOD and P0D were affected by water stress. The results showed that the seedling stage and the flowering period were drought. The content of Malondialdehyde (MDA) increased, the activity of superoxide dismutase (Superoxidase Dismutase, S0D) decreased and the activity of peroxidase (Peroxidase, POD) increased. The drought sensitive varieties were harmed by drought stress, and the drought resistant varieties were less injured. The content of slice MDA was increased by 19.69% than that of the control group. The content of MDA in the variety 7 leaves increased by 11.76%. The P0D activity of S0D activity in the cultivar 7 was 47.13% to the 19.26%. variety 1, and the POD activity in the variety 7 increased the chlorophyll, soluble protein and proline of the pea leaves. The effect of acid and soluble sugar content showed that the effect of drought stress on chlorophyll content of different varieties was different. After drought, the total amount of chlorophyll increased by 41.08%, compared with normal water supply, and the total chlorophyll content of 7 chlorophyll increased only after 0.11%. seedling drought treatment, and the soluble protein increased after 10 days of rehydration. In addition, the 1 soluble protein increased by 18.39%, the protein increased in the variety 7, the soluble protein increased after 25.00%. flowering, 10 days after the rehydration, the increase of protein in the cultivar 1, and the increase of 7.8% in the cultivar 1, and the increase of the content of proline and soluble sugar in the leaves of pea leaves at 22.66%. seedling and flowering stage. After drought treatment, proline in cultivar 1 increased by 21.54%, and proline in variety 7 increased by 38.78% in 24.90%. cultivar 1, and soluble sugar increased by 0.72%.4. using semi quantitative RT-PCR. The difference in expression of actin isoform 3 (Pea actinisoform3, PEAc3) under drought stress of different pea varieties was analyzed. Under drought stress, the change of PEAc3 expression in different varieties was different. The expression of PEAc3 in variety 1 increased obviously, while the expression of PEAc3 in variety 7 decreased obviously. Therefore, PEAc3 may be used as a molecular marker to analyze the damage degree of drought to pea, and may also be used for molecular screening of drought resistant pea varieties.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S643.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄志平,戴瓯和;豌豆品种引进、筛选与评估研究[J];中国种业;2000年03期

2 高富欣;早春豌豆[J];中国农村科技;2001年01期

3 鲁福成,张仲国;我国豌豆品种状况及天津豌豆新品种引种[J];天津农学院学报;2002年04期

4 贺晨邦,冯钦华;豌豆新品种无须豌171[J];西北园艺;2002年04期

5 程泽强;“郑豌1号”豌豆栽培要点[J];河南科技;2002年04期

6 贺晨邦,冯钦华;豌豆新品种无须豌171[J];北方园艺;2002年04期

7 段宁;豌豆品种的耐瘠性研究[J];中国种业;2003年01期

8 邓明富;半无叶豌豆新品种——龙豌一号[J];中国农技推广;2003年01期

9 孟金贵,许彬,张黎,罗慧,李翠东;巧种甜脆豌豆 省工省事高效[J];当代蔬菜;2004年01期

10 张子英;推介几个优质豌豆品种[J];农村百事通;2004年15期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 王芳;龙静宜;曾昭海;康玉凡;胡跃高;;京郊引种加拿大半无叶型豌豆适应性研究[A];中国农作制度研究进展2008[C];2008年

2 郭丽琢;谢军红;何亚慧;黄高宝;;根瘤菌接种对豌豆生长发育及固氮性能的影响[A];中国农作制度研究进展2008[C];2008年

3 刘富中;GostimskiiS.A;;豌豆叶绿素突变基因xa-18的遗传分析[A];中国园艺学会第九届学术年会论文集[C];2001年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 ;超高产、优质、抗倒的豌豆新品种秦选一号[N];农民日报;2001年

2 孙建军邋徐颖峰;象山培育成功豌豆新品[N];宁波日报;2008年

3 余宏章;一样的豌豆 不一样的效益[N];农民日报;2001年

4 余宏章;豌豆也需重视肥料施用[N];农资导报;2009年

5 记者 王朝霞 实习生 刘婉琼;我省豌豆产业发展势头强劲[N];甘肃日报;2010年

6 袁晓泉 陈飞英;中豌5号豌豆春播秋种两相宜[N];山西科技报;2000年

7 于达;南方豌豆将首次跨越北纬37度线冬播[N];农民日报;2012年

8 自治区农科院供稿;推荐两款豌豆品种[N];西藏日报;2006年

9 河北农业大学园艺学院 张广华;豌豆品种类型及茬口安排[N];河北科技报;2008年

10 柴岩;云南 蚕豌豆不是小作物[N];农民日报;2009年

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 吴科生;施氮和接种根瘤菌对豌豆/玉米间作作物产量和水肥利用的影响[D];甘肃农业大学;2015年

2 曾亮;豌豆种质资源遗传多样性分析及白粉病抗性评价[D];甘肃农业大学;2012年

3 李学文;豌豆不同品种耐铝性与细胞壁特性的关系[D];华中农业大学;2016年

4 闫志利;豌豆对水分胁迫的响应及复水效应研究[D];甘肃农业大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 朱峰;苯菌酮在豌豆中残留动态及其光解淋溶环境行为研究[D];中国农业科学院;2015年

2 唐让云;氮源和盐分耦合对豌豆幼苗生长、根系呼吸和离子平衡的影响[D];兰州大学;2015年

3 刘本家;豌豆离体再生体系的建立及遗传稳定性研究[D];甘肃农业大学;2015年

4 方俐;基于SSR标记的豌豆遗传连锁图谱加密及抗冻基因关联分析[D];中国农业科学院;2016年

5 崔月;水分胁迫对豌豆生理生化的影响[D];沈阳农业大学;2017年

6 谈燕;河西灌区间作、免耕与密植对玉米和豌豆生理生态特征的影响[D];甘肃农业大学;2017年

7 张红萍;干旱胁迫对豌豆冠层生长及叶片生理生化指标的影响[D];甘肃农业大学;2008年

8 谢军红;豌豆根瘤菌高效菌株的筛选及共生匹配性研究[D];甘肃农业大学;2008年

9 李玲;国内豌豆种质资源形态性状多样性分析[D];中国农业科学院;2009年

10 张虎天;根瘤菌接种对豌豆/玉米间作体系的影响[D];甘肃农业大学;2010年



本文编号:1937647

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/1937647.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户059a8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com