沿海沙地丛生竹在空间结构差异下的防风效能分析
[Abstract]:In this paper, five kinds of clumped bamboo forests, such as green bamboo, hemp bamboo, big head bamboo, yellow bamboo and flower bamboo, which were successfully introduced into coastal sandy land, were studied in terms of stand characteristics, stand spatial structure, mixed way of bamboo and wood, and so on. In order to provide theoretical basis and reference basis for scientific management and cultivation of bamboo forest protection in coastal sandy land, the wind-proof effectiveness of bamboo shelterbelt in coastal sandy land was comprehensively analyzed and evaluated by using AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) (AHP). The main results are as follows: 1. Thinness is an important index to measure stand structure. The windbreak efficiency of green bamboo protective forest under thinning and permeating structure was the best. The average windbreak efficiency behind the forest belt was 45.86, which was 10.914.84% and 4.26% higher than that of Phyllostachys officinalis, Typhostachys davidii, Cymbidium sinensis and Phyllostachys formosana, respectively, and was 12.73% and 4.26%, respectively. Under the ventilation structure, the average windbreak efficiency of the shelterbelt of bamboo, hemp and green bamboo was better than 26. Under the tight structure, the average windbreak efficiency of the protective forest with green bamboo and flower hanging silk bamboo was the best. The average windbreak efficiency of 5 kinds of shelterbelts in coastal sandy land was increased with the increase of stand density, respectively, and the mean windbreak efficiency of 5 types of bamboo forest with 2 years old was increased with stand density of 800 hm-2. The average windbreak efficiency behind the forest belt is 24.82, and the best is 29.1 for the golden bamboo protection forest, and 54.40 for the forest belt with the stand density of 1500 hm-2, and the best is 60.4 for the bamboo shelterbelt; the best for the bamboo shelterbelt is 60.4 in the forest. When the partial density was 2100 strains of hm-2, The best wind-proof effect of bamboo shelterbelt is 63.4%. Affected by stand thinning permeability, With the increase of stand density, the windbreak efficiency first increased and then decreased slowly. 3. The windbreak efficiency of 5 kinds of clumped bamboo forests in coastal sandy land increased first with the increase of wind speed, then slightly weakened the wind speed change of 5 species of bamboo forest after the forest belt. The trend of the curve is more consistent. The wind speed decreased gradually within the 1H-3H distance after the forest belt and reached the lowest at 3H, which was 52.8- 69.1 lower than that of the control. With the increase of the distance behind the forest belt, the wind-proof effect of the forest belt decreases gradually. Wind speed gradually increased. 5 species of cluster bamboo forest under the four control wind speed, the average windbreak efficiency was 54.29%, 48.39%, 44.27%, 33.54%, 30.79.4, the width of the forest belt and the distance between the bands from the air space, 44.29%, 48.39%, 44.27%, and the width of the forest belt and the distance between the bands from the air. The wind-proof effect of cluster bamboo forest was influenced by the arrangement of bamboo forest. The windbreak efficiency increased with the increase of forest belt width, and the lowest wind speed appeared at the 3H-4H distance behind the forest belt. The cumulative windbreak benefit decreased with the increase of the distance between the two zones, and decreased with the increase of height and wind speed at different distances behind the forest belt. The average wind-proof efficiency of the three vertical height of different thinning structures was 39.3% tight structure 39.0% ventilation structure 32.6.6. the bamboo and wood mixed forest had better wind protection efficiency than pure bamboo forest and Casuarina equisetifolia pure forest. When the ratio of mixed plants is 2:1, the wind-proof efficiency of forest belt is 53.70%, 48.21%, 42.86%, 41.18%, 38.46% and 38.46%, respectively, and the wind-proof efficiency of forest belt is 64.50%, when the ratio of intercropping is 5:3. 62.70%, 56.30%, 55.20%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%, 52.00%. When the block length is 10-15m, the wind-proof efficiency of the forest belt is 55.41%, 45.31%, 44.00%, 42.37%, 42.37%, respectively. The comprehensive wind control effect of bamboo and wood mixed model of 5 kinds of bamboo and wood mixed in Dongshan coastal sandy land is analyzed by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (AHP). The ability to build evaluation models, The comprehensive values of the five mixed ways were as follows: 41.14% interplant mixed with 36.82% interrow mixed and 19.25% banded mixed with 18.88% star-like mixed 12.3636.
【学位授予单位】:福建农林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S795
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邱岭军;何宗明;胡欢甜;林宝平;林宇;汪凤林;林思祖;;滨海沙地不同树种碳氮磷化学计量特征[J];应用与环境生物学报;2017年03期
2 杨青青;杨众养;余雪标;薛杨;王小燕;陈小花;崔喜博;李然;高刘;;不同林龄木麻黄沿海防护林林下植被多样性研究[J];热带作物学报;2016年02期
3 刘玉芳;陈双林;李迎春;郭子武;杨清平;;淹水环境下河竹鞭根养分吸收与积累的适应性调节[J];生态学报;2016年10期
4 林武星;黄雍容;叶功富;聂森;;沙质海岸木麻黄+湿地松林不同混交模式综合效益评价[J];中国水土保持科学;2013年05期
5 朱教君;;防护林学研究现状与展望[J];植物生态学报;2013年09期
6 陈松河;黄全能;郑逢中;马丽娟;包宇航;;NaCl胁迫对3种竹类植物叶片光合作用的影响[J];热带作物学报;2013年05期
7 林爱玉;涂志华;上官保国;荣俊冬;陈礼光;郑郁善;;沿海沙地引种竹子和木麻黄固沙功能比较研究[J];福建林学院学报;2013年01期
8 董毅;王宗星;吴统贵;虞木奎;成向荣;段溪;;上海滨海地区风况时空分布研究[J];长江流域资源与环境;2013年01期
9 李从娟;雷加强;高培;徐新文;王永东;范敬龙;;人工防护林作用下风沙土成土过程的研究进展[J];土壤学报;2012年06期
10 陈火春;楼毅;郑云峰;罗细芳;;我国沿海防护林体系工程建设可持续发展对策研究[J];林业资源管理;2012年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 蔡昕航;沿海防护林4种林地土壤不同季节碳氮动态变化研究[D];福建农林大学;2016年
2 谢雪莉;平潭综合实验区沿海防护林体系综合效益空间分异研究[D];福建农林大学;2016年
3 郑晶晶;保水剂与氮肥互作对沿海防护竹林抗旱性的影响研究[D];福建农林大学;2015年
4 岳新建;东南沿海木麻黄防护林优化配置研究[D];福建农林大学;2010年
5 侯孝明;沿海沙地景观型防护竹林景观评价与优化初探[D];福建农林大学;2010年
6 高城雄;陕北榆林长城沿线风沙区防风固沙林结构与效益研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2008年
7 王小云;防护场理论及其在沿海防护林中的应用研究[D];福建农林大学;2008年
8 郝瑞;沿海沙地竹林细根生态系统特性研究[D];福建农林大学;2007年
9 王新屯;吊丝竹等滨海沙地竹林生态系统特性的研究[D];福建农林大学;2006年
10 陈羡德;沿海沙地高产竹林施肥机理研究[D];福建农林大学;2005年
,本文编号:2157936
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/2157936.html