当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 农业硕士论文 >

玉米抗倒伏性遗传研究及杂种优势分析

发布时间:2018-10-08 13:46
【摘要】:本试验分为两部分内容:第一部分,以Non-Reid和Dom群骨干自交系为基础材料育成自交系,经鉴定选用5个具有代表性的改良系为被测系,以Reid、Non-Reid、Dom群中品质良好的骨干系为测验种,组配5×7共35个不完全双列杂交组合,加之郑单985、先玉335两个对照品种,进行杂种优势及配合力分析。第二部分,以试验设置6万/hm2、8万/hm2、10万/hm2三个密度为主处理,5个改良系及7个骨干系共12个自交系为副处理,采用裂区设计方法,通过与倒伏率的回归分析,研究影响玉米倒伏的主要因素及改良系在抗倒伏性状上的改良效果。主要研究结果如下:1.各主要性状的杂种优势分析结果表明,单株产量超标优势(郑单985和先玉335)的组合有14个,其中,超标优势值大于20%的强优势组合有2个,分别为JND2×PH6WC、JND5×8-F。改良系与Reid群、Non-Reid群、Dom群骨干自交系的杂交,各性状杂种优势值均表现较好的杂种优势模式为(Non-Reid/Dom)×Reid,具有较高的增产潜力。这种杂优模式是本地区今后的玉米主要优势模式。2.配合力分析结果表明,一般配合力分析综合性状表现较好的自交系为改良系JND2、JND3、JND5和骨干系PH6WC、郑58。特殊配合力分析表明,35个杂交组合中,特殊配合力综合性状表现较好的组合有6个,分别为JND2×郑58、JND2×A87、JND3×PH6WC、JND4×PMO、JND4×A87、JND5×郑58。在综合性状表现较好6个组合中,有3个组合的遗传基础为(Non-Reid/Dom)×Reid,进一步说明“两个类群间选系,第3群作测验种”这种模式具有可行性。3.不同密度下各节间茎秆压碎强度分析表明,各自交系茎秆压碎强度随节间上升、密度的增加均呈下降趋势,表现为第3节间至第5节间的下降幅度大于第2节间至第3节间的幅度。茎秆压碎强度改良效果较好的改良系为JND1、JND2和JND5,以JND5最好。倒伏率改良效果较好的改良系为JND2、JND5。4.茎秆主要性状与倒伏率的通径分析和偏相关分析显示,各节间压碎强度、节间长、穗位高系数、干重是决定倒伏率的首要因素。单位节间干物质量、长粗比、穗位、节间直径对倒伏率也有不同程度的影响。其中,压碎强度、干重、单位节间干物质量和节间直径对倒伏率呈负向效应,有一定的限制作用;节间长、穗位高系数、干重和穗位对倒伏率的效应为正效应。
[Abstract]:The experiment was divided into two parts: in the first part, the inbred lines were bred from the backbone inbred lines of Non-Reid and Dom groups. Five representative improved lines were selected as tested lines, and the backbone lines with good quality in Reid,Non-Reid,Dom group were selected as test species. The heterosis and combining ability of 35 incomplete diallel crosses, plus Zhengdan 985 and Xianyu 335, were analyzed. In the second part, we set up three densities of 60,000 / hm ~ 2, 80,000 / hm ~ 2 and 100000 / hm ~ 2, and 12 inbred lines of 5 improved lines and 7 backbone lines were used as secondary treatments. The method of split zone design was adopted, and the regression analysis with lodging rate was adopted. The main factors affecting lodging in maize and the improvement effect of improved lines on lodging resistance were studied. The main results are as follows: 1. The results of heterosis analysis of main characters showed that there were 14 combinations with yield exceeding standard per plant (Zhengdan 985 and Xianyu335), among which, there were 2 strong heterosis combinations (JND2 脳 PH6WC,JND5 脳 8-F), where the value of excess heterosis was more than 20%. The heterosis pattern of heterosis between the improved line and the backbone inbred line of Reid Non-Reid group was (Non-Reid/Dom) 脳 Reid, with higher yield potential. This heterosis pattern is the main dominant pattern of maize in this area. The results of combining ability analysis showed that the inbred lines with better comprehensive traits in general combining ability analysis were improved line JND2,JND3,JND5 and backbone line PH6WC, Zheng58. The results of special combining ability analysis showed that there were 6 combinations with better comprehensive traits of special combining ability, which were JND2 脳 Zheng 58 (JND2 脳 A87) JND3 脳 PH6WC,JND4 脳 PMO,JND4 脳 A87 (JND5 脳 Zheng 58). The genetic basis of three combinations was (Non-Reid/Dom) 脳 Reid, which further showed that the model of "selecting lines between two groups and using group 3 as test species" was feasible. The analysis of crushing strength of internode culm at different densities showed that the crushing strength of stem increased with the increase of internode density, and the density increased with the increase of internode density. The decrease from the third Internode to the 5th Internode was greater than that from the second Internode to the third Internode. JND1,JND2 and JND5, were the best lines for improving the crushing strength of stem. JND5 was the best. The improved line with better effect of lodging rate improvement is JND2,JND5.4.. Path analysis and partial correlation analysis of the main characters of stem and lodging rate showed that the crushing strength, Internode length, ear height coefficient and dry weight were the primary factors to determine the lodging rate. Dry weight of unit Internode, ratio of length to diameter, ear position and Internode diameter also had different effects on lodging rate. Among them, crushing strength, dry weight, dry weight per unit Internode and internode diameter have negative effect on lodging rate, and the effects of Internode length, ear height coefficient, dry weight and ear position on lodging rate are positive effects.
【学位授予单位】:吉林农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S513

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郑亭;陈溢;樊高琼;李金刚;李朝苏;荣晓椒;李国瑞;杨文钰;郭翔;;株行配置对带状条播小麦群体光环境及抗倒伏性能的影响[J];中国农业科学;2013年08期

2 张倩;张明才;张海燕;谭伟明;李召虎;段留生;;30%矮·烯微乳剂对水稻茎秆理化特性的调控[J];作物学报;2013年06期

3 刘鑫;谢瑞芝;牛兴奎;修文雯;李少昆;高世菊;张凤路;;种植密度对东北地区不同年代玉米生产主推品种抗倒伏性能的影响[J];作物杂志;2012年05期

4 高鑫;高聚林;于晓芳;王志刚;孙继颖;苏治军;胡树平;叶君;王海燕;崔超;李维敏;;高密植对不同类型玉米品种茎秆抗倒特性及产量的影响[J];玉米科学;2012年04期

5 唐丽媛;李从锋;马玮;赵明;李向岭;李连禄;;渐密种植条件下玉米植株形态特征及其相关性分析[J];作物学报;2012年08期

6 张云明;田保明;师恭曜;黄乐乐;柳洋洋;;油菜茎秆几种发育相关酶的活性对茎秆抗倒伏性的影响[J];中国农学通报;2011年18期

7 王娜;李凤海;王志斌;王宏伟;吕香玲;周宇飞;史振声;;不同耐密型玉米品种茎秆性状对密度的响应及与倒伏的关系[J];作物杂志;2011年03期

8 边少锋;赵洪祥;徐克章;孟祥盟;王晓慧;;雨养条件下春玉米“吨粮田”栽培的增产因素分析[J];西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版);2011年06期

9 王永学;张战辉;刘宗华;;玉米抗倒伏性状的配合力效应及通径分析[J];河南农业大学学报;2011年01期

10 王国胜;陈举林;侯玮;闫保罗;孙洪波;李平海;;玉米杂种优势类群划分与杂种优势模式研究进展[J];现代农业科技;2011年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 吴s,

本文编号:2256978


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/2256978.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户66f69***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com