台安县新华农场农田水利建设项目后评价

发布时间：2018-10-18 14:11

【摘要】：本研究将农田水利建设与项目后评价理论相结合,客观、真实地评判一个农田水利建设项目是否成功,从评价过程中发现问题,总结经验教训,主要研究内容如下:本文首先对台安县新华农场农田水利建设项目基础资料进行收集和预处理。研读项目立项文件、项目建议书、可行性研究报告以及规划设计等资料,运用南方测绘Cass7.0软件和ArcGIS10.1操作平台对项目实施界限准确定位,采用遥感影像嵌套及图斑裁剪等处理,还原项目区原貌,简要介绍项目建设情况。其次建立台安县新华农场农田水利建设项目后评价理论体系,根据项目区现场调查结果,依据项目竣工验收报告以及该项目实际运营情况,分别从整个建设过程、经济效益、社会影响和环境影响多个方面对理论体系中各指标进行分析讨论,为后续项目综合后评价工作的开展奠定基础。第三,结合项目后评价理论,运用层次分析法(AHP法)将整个评价过程(A)划分为四个准则层,分别是过程后评价(B1)、经济后评价(B2)、社会影响后评价(B3)、环境影响后评价(B4),每个准则层单独划分为若干因素层(C1-Cn)。同理,每个因素层继续划分为若干指标层(D1-Dn)。接下来,运用yaahP10.5软件进行计算并最终确定该项目后评价各指标因素的权重值。第四,运用模糊综合评价法,确定各评价指标间的隶属程度。随后按照指标层(D)→因素层(C)→准则层(B)→评价结果(A)的层级关系,构建多级模糊综合评价模型,逐级进行评价,得出该项目最终评分。最后,根据项目后评价最终评分得出结论,本项目过程后评价、经济后评价、社会影响后评价均为良好,环境影响后评价为合格。本研究总目标(A)的取值为0.5815,项目综合后评价结果为良好,项目预期建设目标基本实现,评价结果与实际建设、运营情况基本吻合。
[Abstract]:This study combines farmland water conservancy construction with post-project evaluation theory to objectively and truly judge whether a farmland water conservancy construction project is successful or not, discover problems from the evaluation process, sum up experience and lessons. The main contents are as follows: firstly, the basic data of farmland and water conservancy construction project of Xinhua Farm in Taian County are collected and pretreated. To study the documents of project establishment, project proposal, feasibility study report, planning and design, etc., using the southern mapping Cass7.0 software and ArcGIS10.1 operating platform to accurately locate the boundary of the project, and using remote sensing image nesting and spot clipping, etc. Restore the original appearance of the project area and briefly introduce the project construction situation. Secondly, establish the theoretical system of post-evaluation of irrigation and water conservancy construction project of Xinhua Farm in Taian County. According to the field investigation results of the project area, according to the acceptance report of the completion of the project and the actual operation situation of the project, from the whole construction process, economic benefits, The social impact and environmental impact are analyzed and discussed in various aspects of the theoretical system, which lays the foundation for the development of the post-comprehensive evaluation of the follow-up project. Thirdly, combining with the post-project evaluation theory, the (A) of the whole evaluation process is divided into four criterion layers by using the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). They are process post-evaluation (B1), economic post-evaluation (B2), social impact post-assessment (B3) and post-environmental impact assessment (B4). Each criterion layer is divided into several factor layers (C1-Cn). Similarly, each factor layer continues to be divided into several indicator layers (D1-Dn). Then, the yaahP10.5 software is used to calculate and determine the weight value of each index factor after the project. Fourth, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to determine the degree of membership among the evaluation indicators. Then according to the hierarchical relationship of (B) evaluation result of (D) / factor layer (C) criterion layer, a multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is constructed and evaluated step by step, and the final score of the project is obtained. Finally, according to the final score of the project post-evaluation, it is concluded that the process post-evaluation, the economic post-evaluation, the social impact post-evaluation are all good, and the environmental impact post-evaluation is qualified. The value of (A) is 0.5815, the result of comprehensive evaluation is good, the expected construction goal of the project is basically realized, the evaluation result is consistent with the actual construction, and the operation situation is basically consistent.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：S27

【相似文献】