宁夏旱区几个红枣新品种引进筛选研究
[Abstract]:In order to alleviate the slow renewal of jujube varieties in the arid area of central Ningxia, enrich the local jujube varieties and further promote the development of jujube industry. Six 4-year-old jujube varieties were used as experimental materials to observe phenological period of different jujube varieties, as well as to analyze growth characters, photosynthetic basic characteristics, fruit quality and yield one by one and to evaluate their principal components. The results showed that: (1) the germination time of six red jujube varieties were distributed at different stages in April, the germination time of Gutou jujube was the earliest, the next was "Hami jujube", the "concentric round jujube" was the last; The flowering period of "concentric round jujube" was the earliest, and that of each variety was in mid-late May, the last flowering period was from mid-late June to early July, the fruit-setting period was maintained from late June to early July, and the fruit-setting period was maintained from late June to early July, the last flowering period was from mid-late June to early July. The mature period of red jujube was concentrated in the first ten days of September, with "concentric round jujube", "dog head jujube" beginning to mature first, "Jun jujube" and "small mouth jujube" maturing later. 2, the growth period of "Jinchang No. 1" and "small mouth jujube" was shorter; "Jun jujube", "concentric round jujube", "Hami jujube" growth period medium; The growth period of Dou Tou jujube is the longest. 3. The single fruit weight of "Jinchang No. 1" is the largest, up to 24.31 g, and the single fruit weight of "Dou Tou Jujube" is the smallest, only 10.16 g, but its yield per mu is the largest, followed by "concentric round jujube." The yield per mu of "Xiaokou jujube" was the lowest. 4. In this experiment, 37 indexes of six different varieties of red jujube in the drought zone of central Ningxia were used to screen out principal component factors by principal component analysis, and the scores of each principal component factor and the comprehensive score of each variety were calculated. The results showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the first three principal component factors reached 88.97%, which could reflect most of the information of the original sample. The comprehensive score of each variety was calculated by this method, and the comprehensive score of "Jinchang No. 1" was the highest. Next is "Shanxi Junzao", the lowest comprehensive score is "small jujube".
【学位授予单位】:宁夏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S665.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘璐;王景红;张维敏;李艳莉;;1971—2010年陕北红枣种植区气候变化特征及其对物候期的影响[J];干旱气象;2016年05期
2 赵进儒;王惠萍;李金云;;甘肃酒泉市灰枣引种栽培现状、存在问题及对策[J];中国园艺文摘;2016年08期
3 佟斌;;铁岭市彩色小麦引种栽培初报[J];园艺与种苗;2016年08期
4 刘隋峗昊;李建贵;韩超;杨文英;于婷;王娜;;30个制干枣品种在新疆库尔勒地区的引种[J];经济林研究;2016年03期
5 李涛;赵东兴;陈林杨;赵国祥;黄绍忠;王树明;周劲松;;南药牛大力引种试验初报[J];中国热带农业;2016年03期
6 余莉;张时龙;李清超;杨珊;王昭礼;吴宪志;卢运;赵龙;;主成分分析在芸豆品种筛选中的应用[J];东北农业科学;2016年02期
7 卢立娜;高崇华;贺晓辉;任余艳;石麟;徐瑞峰;;鄂尔多斯地区红枣引种及开发利用现状[J];防护林科技;2016年04期
8 陈维忠;;大棚西红柿新品种引种试验[J];现代农业科技;2015年18期
9 蒋卉;丁慧萍;白红进;;新疆南疆引进鲜食枣品种品质性状的综合评价[J];食品科学;2016年03期
10 黄宏文;段子渊;廖景平;张征;;植物引种驯化对近500年人类文明史的影响及其科学意义[J];植物学报;2015年03期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 曹兵;宋丽华;蒋全熊;;宁夏经济林发展现状与展望[A];第十五届中国科协年会第19分会场:中国西部生态林业和民生林业与科技创新学术研讨会论文集[C];2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈玲;华南植物园蕨类植物引种栽培调查分析[D];仲恺农业工程学院;2015年
2 谢玲;不同品种观赏桃生长特性的比较研究[D];中南林业科技大学;2015年
3 刘洁;不同水肥处理对灵武长枣生长与果实品质的影响[D];宁夏大学;2014年
4 肖丽珍;哈尔滨地区无核葡萄引种适应性研究[D];中国农业科学院;2013年
5 李作军;6种观赏竹在关中地区引种栽培试验[D];西北农林科技大学;2013年
6 张欣欣;果桑不同品种物候期、生长特性及主要营养成分研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2013年
7 巴图;马铃薯中联红引种试验及抗旱生理研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2010年
8 金花;常绿阔叶植物在北京地区的引种栽培研究[D];北京林业大学;2009年
9 马廷贵;宁夏中部干旱带同心圆枣栽培技术研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2008年
10 顾丽;地被植物在城市园林绿地中的应用探析[D];西南大学;2008年
,本文编号:2458415
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/2458415.html