现代法治的“为”与“不为”——从“李雪莲”的两项诉求说起

发布时间：2018-01-10 08:35

本文关键词：现代法治的“为”与“不为”——从“李雪莲”的两项诉求说起　出处：《浙江社会科学》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：电影《秋菊打官司》曾引发"法治特殊论"与"法治普遍论"之争,电影《我不是潘金莲》有助于重新审视这场争论。对女主角"李雪莲"两项诉求的分析表明,现代法治在特定事务上"无能为力"的表象,是刻意"有所不为"的结果,目的在于"有所作为",同时要求"不可乱为"。通过不介入某些实质问题、拒绝做出人格判断等自我限制,法治得以在高度复杂的现代社会中,执行稳定行为预期的重要功能。迫使法律进行不适当的实质考量,引入"合法/非法"之外的第三种价值,不会让法治更加完善,只会损害法治本身。另外,"法律与文学"研究面向戏剧化的文本,可能错失典型的人和事,存在先天局限。
[Abstract]:The film Qiuju Litigation has led to the controversy between "the special theory of rule of law" and "the universal theory of rule of law". The film "I am not Pan Jinlian" helps to re-examine the debate. An analysis of the heroine's two appeals to "Li Xuelian" shows that the modern rule of law is "powerless" in certain matters. It is the result of deliberate "something not to do", the purpose is to "do something", at the same time to ask "not to do anything". By not intervening in some substantive issues, refusing to make personality judgment and other self-restriction. In a highly complex modern society, the rule of law enables it to perform an important function of expected stabilization... It forces the law to carry out inappropriate substantive considerations and introduce a third value beyond "legality / illegality". It will not perfect the rule of law, it will only damage the rule of law itself. In addition, the text of the study of law and literature oriented to drama may miss out on typical people and events, and there are inherent limitations.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学科学研究院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“‘司法治理’思潮与多元解纷机制再司法化”(编号:13YJC820058)的研究成果
【分类号】：D920.4;J905
【正文快照】： 2016年上映的电影《我不是潘金莲》,总让人联想起1992年那部《秋菊打官司》。令法学界记忆犹新的是,作为本土法社会学的一支,当代中国的“法律与文学”研究,曾因《秋菊打官司》热闹过好一阵子。通过对《秋菊打官司》的解读,借助美国人类学家克利福德·吉尔兹的“地方性知识”

【相似文献】