中国电影史学史研究纲要
[Abstract]:Under the background of calling for the study of Chinese film history to enter the historical field of vision and to increase the character of history, the article holds that the study of Chinese film history wants to enter the historical field of vision, after the study of Chinese film history has developed to a certain stage. First of all, it is necessary to clean up its historical heritage since its emergence, and to study the history of Chinese film historiography. By describing the changing process of Chinese film historiography and revealing its law, it can provide support to grasp the present situation and future research direction of Chinese film history research. In this way, not only can the academic conception of Chinese film history into the perspective of ordinary history be concretely realized at the subject level, but also the concrete predicament that Chinese film history is facing in the study can be solved. As the initial outline of the new discipline, the main work is the establishment of the research framework. Solving the research framework requires two levels of preparation. Among them, there are two preparations in the first layer: the digestion and absorption of the theory of history and the establishment of the theory of Chinese film history. The second preparation is based on the first preparation, the first preparation is the premise of the second preparation. The second level of preparation for solving the research framework is the interactive test of discipline theory and practice. The above two levels are prepared to be realized in two parts: "theoretical Construction of Chinese Film History" and "Fifty years of Chinese Film History". In the first part, through the clarification of the key coordinates of history and the research paradigm of the history of Chinese history and the western history of history, the first part combines the research paradigm of the history of other specialized disciplines. Put forward the theoretical framework of Chinese film history. The second part through the analysis of the key historical heritage of Chinese film historiography from 1914 to the first fifty years of 1963 outlines the development process and law of Chinese film historiography in this period. This part makes use of the horizontal comparative study between Chinese film historiography and Chinese and western historiography, especially Chinese historiography, sums up the historical characteristics of the intrinsic elements of Chinese film historiography, describes the changes of historiography by the longitudinal comparison of the characteristics of Chinese film historiography before and after. By using "internal and external compound drive" to analyze the causes of the appearance and change of the historical characteristics, to reveal the concrete and macroscopic laws of the development of historiography, and to present the historical stages and the concrete research. On the basis of the discipline theory established in the first part, this part not only produces the research achievements of Chinese film history, but also tests and perfects the subject theory in application. It also preliminarily develops a research practice on the important stage of the development of Chinese film historiography. That is, this part has the independent academic value of the research practice on the component value of the discipline theory, and the combination with the first part has become an indispensable important part of the research framework. It provides the foundation and experience for the future sustainability research.
【学位授予单位】:中国艺术研究院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:J909.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李必胜;;断代史学史研究的新收获——《宋代史学思想史》评介[J];安徽史学;1993年03期
2 周文玖;二十世纪三十年代史学史研究述论[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2000年02期
3 张子侠;史学史学科发展的新趋向[J];淮北煤师院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年03期
4 吴怀祺;新世纪史学史研究的若干思考[J];淮北煤师院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年03期
5 廉敏;2003、2004年中国古代史学史研究[J];中国史研究动态;2005年11期
6 赵骞;王旭送;;读书得间 学贵专精——彭忠德先生《秦前史学史研究》评析[J];咸宁学院学报;2011年01期
7 王煦华;;读者来函[J];史学史研究;1981年04期
8 王建辉;;史学史与史学理论[J];历史教学;1990年04期
9 ;欢迎订阅全国中文(历史类)核心期刊《史学史研究》[J];史学史研究;2011年03期
10 汪受宽;屈直敏;;建立全民族的中国史学史[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 徐国利;;当代中国大陆的史学评论理论研究述评[A];史学批评与史学文化研究[C];2009年
2 张复合;孙礼;;后记[A];建筑史论文集(第15辑)[C];2002年
3 乔治忠;;官方史学视角下的中外史学比较[A];史学批评与史学文化研究[C];2009年
4 桑兵;;中国近现代史的贯通与滞碍[A];过去的经验与未来的可能走向——中国近代史研究三十年(1979-2009)[C];2009年
5 邢淼;罗非;钟作英;;1992年郭沫若百年诞辰纪念报刊资料索引[A];郭沫若百年诞辰纪念文集[C];1992年
6 张剑平;;新中国成立后“十七年”马克思主义史学评价问题[A];史学批评与史学文化研究[C];2009年
7 宋学勤;;“梁启超式的输入”的真意义——兼论中西史学文化的接轨与融合[A];史学批评与史学文化研究[C];2009年
8 王春鹏;高向杰;;当代美国教育史学发展的特征及思考[A];纪念《教育史研究》创刊二十周年论文集(1)——教育史学理论及史学史研究[C];2009年
9 张承宗;;六朝史学研究的回顾与展望[A];建国六十年来六朝史研究的回顾与展望学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
10 张越;;从对整理国故和“古史辨派”的评价看郭沫若的史学思想[A];郭沫若与百年中国学术文化回望[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 北京师范大学历史学院 张越;摆脱单一学科史局限[N];社会科学报;2010年
2 宁波大学史学史研究所所长 钱茂伟;史学史研究亟需自己的理论与方法[N];社会科学报;2007年
3 叶帆;让史学走出书斋[N];人民日报;2010年
4 张雷 商丘师范学院;史学大众化反思[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
5 华中师范大学历史文化学院副教授 尤学工;史学可以娱乐化吗[N];北京日报;2011年
6 扬州大学 周一平 许曾会;“不在场的主角”促进通俗史学发展[N];社会科学报;2011年
7 记者周群;关注记忆研究 引领史学发展[N];中国社会科学报;2009年
8 贾s,
本文编号:2230339
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/dianyingdianshilunwen/2230339.html