探究我国法律服务行业律师收入的赢家通吃现象

发布时间：2018-02-16 17:49

本文关键词： 赢家通吃过度自信律师收入两极分化　出处：《东北财经大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：刘翔在04年雅典奥运会男子110米栏比赛中获得冠军并打破了奥运会记录,所有人都沉浸在兴奋和喜悦的氛围中,没有人留意到亚军——美国名将特伦斯·特拉梅尔眼角流露出的一丝落寞和失望。尽管他们的差距只是区区的0.27秒,前者随之而来的是数百万计的广告代言费,后者却很快被世人遗忘。这种以相对表现而非绝对表现定奖酬,并且奖酬很容易集中在少数几个顶尖的杰出人才手中的现象就称为“赢家通吃”。 “赢家通吃”的酬赏制度在演艺界、体坛、艺术圈内早已普遍行之。但今天,它已渗透到我们经济社会里其他的众多层面,譬如司法、医学、高等教育、银行投资、时装、出版、媒体以及企业管理人员等各个领域。我国的律师行业就是这样一个“赢家通吃”市场,业内的“二八定律”将这一现象描述得更加具体：80%的案源,被20%的律师占有,20%律师的创收,占有律师行业的80%。这就不可避免的使律师行业形成一个金字塔的形状：处在塔尖的少部分人掌握了业内的大部分资源,而处在塔底的大部分人却为了仅剩的资源展开了激烈的竞争。这样不仅使我国律师收入产生严重的两极分化,更降低了社会资源的实际利用效率,没有达到最优化配置的目的。本文通过分析赢家通吃市场的特点以及产生的原因,进而探究我国法律服务行业中律师收入两极分化的主要根源,最后再针对这些现象得出结论和含义。本文的目的不仅是分析我国律师收入的“赢家通吃”现状,更是想通过各方的努力,消除或削弱“赢家通吃”所导致的两极分化程度,从而实现“共赢”的状态。
[Abstract]:Liu Xiang in the 04 Athens Olympic Games men's 110 meter hurdles champion and broke the Olympic record, all people are immersed in the excitement and joy of the atmosphere, no one noticed a runner - U.S. champion Terence Tramel eyes showing the desolation and despair. Although the difference was a mere 0.27 seconds, the former there are millions of advertising endorsement fees, the latter was soon forgotten. The relative performance rather than absolute performance will reward, and reward is very easy to concentrate on a few top outstanding talents in the hands of the phenomenon is known as the "winner".
"Winner" reward system in the entertainment industry, sports, art circle has long been common for. But today, it has penetrated into many other aspects, such as the US economic and social justice, medicine, higher education, investment banking, fashion, publishing, various fields of media and business managers. I like the legal profession is just a "winner" market, the "28 law" will be a more specific description of the phenomenon: 80% cases, 20% were lawyers possession, the 20% lawyer's income, possession of lawyer 80%. which can not avoid the lawyer industry form the shape of a Pyramid: at the tip of the few people who mastered most of the resources industry, and most of the people in the bottom of the tower is a fierce competition for the remaining resources. This not only makes the lawyer income polarization is serious, but also reduces the The actual utilization efficiency of social resources has not reached the goal of optimal allocation.
This paper analyzes the characteristics of winner take all market and the reasons, and then explore the main source of China's legal service industry lawyer income polarization, finally draws the conclusion in view of these phenomena and meaning. The purpose of this paper is not only the analysis of China's lawyer income "winner" situation, more is to through the efforts of all parties, eliminate or weaken the degree of polarization of winner "caused by, so as to achieve a" win-win "state.

【学位授予单位】：东北财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D926.5

【参考文献】