建筑设计中的概念创作研究
发布时间：2018-08-12 09:10
【摘要】： 正如鲍德里亚(Jean·Baudrillard)在他对当今社会生产体系的研究中所论述的那样,我们社会的价值交换不再依赖于马克思社会必要劳动时间的假说,而是依靠某种象征性的观念(鲍德里亚,2006.4)①。凭借这一点,我们可以认为我们步入了一个“概念(Concept)”的时代,即事物的生产在很大程度上不再依赖于实体的事物,而是依靠对事物概念的重新创造。事实上,我们可以在我们社会中众多的职业门类中出现的新现象来印证这一观点。无论是在广告传媒领域、房地产策划领域、商品包装领域、建筑设计领域甚至当代艺术所推崇的创意产业领域,“概念”一词都是这些领域从业的核心词汇。 然而,什么是概念?我们可以在我们所熟悉的建筑设计的话语中找到一些的和“概念”相近似的词汇,例如“观念(notion)”、“想法(idea)”、“创造(creativity)”等。那么这些词和概念是一个意思么,或者它们之间又有什么样的关系?这个问题也许只有在更晚的时候提出,涉及到对这个问题正面研究的文献也并不多。因此本文很难从已有的历史文献中找出庞证博引来说明我们找到了一条“概念”之道,按照这条道路我们通向了建筑设计的绝对正确的创造性的地方。但我们至少可以通过对已有观念和现象的分析,来说明什么不是“概念的”;或者找出我们建筑设计工作中,在使用“概念”时哪些问题和概念相关,哪些问题并不涉及到“概念”即我们认为的统治了建筑设计工作的那个概念;或者分析哪些情况下对概念的使用是合适的即理性的、符合我们认知观念的,哪些又不是…… 总之,与其说本文的写作是对“概念创作”的直接研究,还不如说是在我们所面临的“概念时代”的背景下,以概念的角度来研究建筑设计中话语、形象、表达等具体工作如何更加理性进行的一种尝试。本着这一态度,本文首先从少量的涉及到“概念”的哲学认识论(Epistemology)中整理出笔者所认识的概念,对其进行大致的描述;然后通过对这一概念的定义去考察在建筑设计中话语和图像的建构方式,并指出我们通常所理解的“解释”和“符号”与概念之间的关系与区别,同时提出如何以更理性的方式在概念中对其掌握和运用。最后提出建筑设计中创作概念过程的模型,并尝试着指出判断“概念”的方法。
[Abstract]:As Baudrillard (Jean Baudrillard) argued in his study of the production system of today's society, the exchange of values in our society no longer depends on the hypothesis that Marx must work time in society. It relies on a symbolic concept (Baudrillard 2004. 4) 1. By virtue of this, we can think that we have stepped into the era of "concept (Concept)", that is, the production of things no longer depends on physical things to a great extent, but on the re-creation of the concept of things. In fact, we can confirm this view by new phenomena in many professional categories in our society. Whether in the field of advertising media, real estate planning, commodity packaging, architectural design or even the creative industry, the word "concept" is the core word in these fields. However, what is a concept? We can find some words which are similar to "concept" in the familiar words of architectural design, such as "idea (notion)", "idea (idea)", "create (creativity)" and so on. So are these words and concepts the same meaning, or what is the relationship between them? The question may only be raised later, and there is not much literature on positive research on the issue. Therefore, it is difficult for this paper to find out from the existing historical documents that we have found a way of "concept", according to which we lead to the absolutely correct creative place of architectural design. But we can at least explain what is not "conceptual" by analyzing existing ideas and phenomena, or find out which problems are relevant to concepts when we use them in our architectural design work. Which problems do not relate to "concept", that is, the concept that we think governs the architectural design work, or to analyze which conditions are suitable for the use of the concept, that is, rational, consistent with our cognitive concept, and which are not. In a word, the writing of this paper is not so much a direct study of "conceptual creation" as a study of discourse and image in architectural design from a conceptual perspective under the background of the "concept age" we are facing. An attempt at how to be more rational in specific work, such as expression. Based on this attitude, this paper first from a small number of philosophical epistemology involved in the "concept" (Epistemology) collate the author's understanding of the concept, to carry out a general description of it; Then through the definition of this concept to examine the construction of discourse and image in architectural design, and point out the relationship and difference between "interpretation" and "symbol" and concept, which we usually understand. At the same time, it puts forward how to master and apply it in a more rational way. Finally, the model of conceptual process in architectural design is put forward, and the method of judging "concept" is tried to be pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：TU201
本文编号：2178601
[Abstract]:As Baudrillard (Jean Baudrillard) argued in his study of the production system of today's society, the exchange of values in our society no longer depends on the hypothesis that Marx must work time in society. It relies on a symbolic concept (Baudrillard 2004. 4) 1. By virtue of this, we can think that we have stepped into the era of "concept (Concept)", that is, the production of things no longer depends on physical things to a great extent, but on the re-creation of the concept of things. In fact, we can confirm this view by new phenomena in many professional categories in our society. Whether in the field of advertising media, real estate planning, commodity packaging, architectural design or even the creative industry, the word "concept" is the core word in these fields. However, what is a concept? We can find some words which are similar to "concept" in the familiar words of architectural design, such as "idea (notion)", "idea (idea)", "create (creativity)" and so on. So are these words and concepts the same meaning, or what is the relationship between them? The question may only be raised later, and there is not much literature on positive research on the issue. Therefore, it is difficult for this paper to find out from the existing historical documents that we have found a way of "concept", according to which we lead to the absolutely correct creative place of architectural design. But we can at least explain what is not "conceptual" by analyzing existing ideas and phenomena, or find out which problems are relevant to concepts when we use them in our architectural design work. Which problems do not relate to "concept", that is, the concept that we think governs the architectural design work, or to analyze which conditions are suitable for the use of the concept, that is, rational, consistent with our cognitive concept, and which are not. In a word, the writing of this paper is not so much a direct study of "conceptual creation" as a study of discourse and image in architectural design from a conceptual perspective under the background of the "concept age" we are facing. An attempt at how to be more rational in specific work, such as expression. Based on this attitude, this paper first from a small number of philosophical epistemology involved in the "concept" (Epistemology) collate the author's understanding of the concept, to carry out a general description of it; Then through the definition of this concept to examine the construction of discourse and image in architectural design, and point out the relationship and difference between "interpretation" and "symbol" and concept, which we usually understand. At the same time, it puts forward how to master and apply it in a more rational way. Finally, the model of conceptual process in architectural design is put forward, and the method of judging "concept" is tried to be pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：TU201
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孙海音;当代城市居住空间布景研究[D];华南理工大学;2011年
，本文编号：2178601
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/guanggaoshejilunwen/2178601.html
