差比范畴及递进性差比义构式研究

发布时间：2018-03-07 04:08

本文选题：差比　切入点：递进　出处：《上海师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文借鉴构式语法理论的框架对递进性差比义构式各变式之间的承继关系、形成动因及机理作出合理的解释。对于“遍指性非差比义构式”的研究，，以往学界认为是由“递进性差比义构式”演变出来的，而我们认为典型的“一M比一M+VP”构式（包括本文归纳的A、B、C三式）都表达“递进性差比义”，而遍指性非差比义构式（D式）发生了质变，它的构式义无法从“一M比一M”中直接推导出来，是非典型的句式，却又是更典型的构式。全文共分六个章节。第一章：主要陈述了本文的选题意义，对前人的研究成果进行总结。第二章：本章介绍了构式语法理论渊源、Goldberg的构式语法理论和陆俭明“构式—语块”理论。我们认为比较范畴是一个连续的、边界模糊的原型范畴，量级作为人类认知中的一个基本意象图式，是形成比较句的基础。第三章：借鉴构式语法理论的框架，对递进性差比义构式进行定性。分析递进性差比义构式三种典型变式，并对这三种变式之间的承继关系以及该构式的成因进行认知范畴的探索，给出合理的解释。第四章：我们认为，非典型的构式（D式）发生了“质变”，表达“遍指性非差比义”，而这个构式义无法从“一M比一M”中推导出来，因而是更典型的构式。本章指出遍指性非差比义其质变的根源在于“量级序列”的缺失。第五章：本章分析了递进性差比义构式的句法结构特点及句法结构的规约意义和蕴含意义，辨析了“递进性差比义构式”与“越来越”句和“都”字句在句法和表达上的差异。第六章：概括全文，提出观点，指出非典型构式比典型构式更具典型性。
[Abstract]:Based on the relationship between the framework of construction grammar theory of progressive difference ratio between various constructions, the cause of formation and mechanism to make a reasonable explanation for the times. To study the non difference ratio construction ", the previous scholars think it is evolved from the" progressive difference ratio construction ". And we think that the typical" M a M+VP "construction (including the induction of A, B, C three) have expressed" progressive difference ratio ", and generalized non - difference ratio construction (D) change, meaning it can not come out from the direct derivation a M than a M", is a typical sentence, but it is a more typical construction. The thesis consists of six chapters.
The first chapter mainly describes the significance of this topic, and summarizes the achievements of the previous research.
The second chapter: this chapter introduces the construction grammar theory, Goldberg grammar and Lu Jianming "construction - Chunk Theory. We think the comparative category is a continuous, prototype fuzzy boundary, the order as a basic image schema of human cognition, is the basis for the formation of comparative sentences.
The third chapter: Based on the framework of construction grammar theory, the progressive difference ratio construction. The qualitative analysis of progressive difference ratio construction of three kinds of typical variant, and explore the cognitive category of inheritance relationship between these three kinds of variable type and the causes of the construction of the reasonable explanation is given.
The fourth chapter: we believe that the construction of atypical (D) occurred in the "quality", "the expression of generalized non - difference ratio, and the constructional meaning from" a M than a M derived, it is a more typical construction. This chapter points out that generalized non - difference the ratio of the root source meaning lies in its qualitative change "missing order sequence".
The fifth chapter: this chapter analyzes the progressive difference ratio construction specification meaning characteristics of the syntactic structure and syntactic structure and implicit meaning, analysis of the "progressive difference ratio construction" and "more and more" and "all" words and expression in syntactic differences.
The sixth chapter: summarize the full text, put forward the point of view, and point out that the atypical structure is more typical than the typical structure.

【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【相似文献】