语境理论研究评述

发布时间：2018-03-09 10:41

本文选题：语境理论　切入点：传统观　出处：《安徽大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：语境,即语言交际的环境,规定和制约着言语交际内容、形式和结果。长期以来,人们试图揭开它神秘的面纱,对语境理论做了不懈的探索,付出了艰辛的劳动。本文概述了语境研究的历史线索和发展轨迹,分类整合了前人的研究成果,对传统语境观和动态语境观进行了对比,在此基础上,提出了语境研究的一些浅见。全文共分为六个章节：第一章绪论。首先,介绍了语境的概念和重要性,指出语境是语言赖以生存的根基,并与其他学科有着密切的联系；其次,概述了西方和中国古代学者对语境的研究情况；再次,分析了语境研究的现状；最后,说明了选题的意义,希望通过综合整理及动静结合的语境研究方法(笔者拙见),对语境问题做出更深刻、更全面和更本质的揭示。第二章西方语境理论的产生与发展。首先,简要地介绍了语境理论在西方的产生与发展的轨迹；其次,详细介绍了皮尔士的“索引词汇”理论,马林诺夫斯基的“意义背后的意义”理论,弗斯的语言语境和情景语境理论,韩礼德的“语域理论”及海姆斯对语境构成因素的分析等,并扼要地评价了他们的贡献及理论上的缺陷。第三章现代中国学者对语境的研究。本章是全篇的重点,分为五个部分：从微观上分别把学者们的语境研究成果进行分类、整理,并从语境的构成、分类、功能、性质四个方面作了详细的说明和阐释。笔者希望通过以上整合的资料能为学者们今后的研究提供一定的帮助。第四章理论新进展：动态语境观。首先,对语境的动态性特征进行了介绍,指出用动态的眼光来观察和研究语境是十分必要的；其次,比较详细的对斯珀泊和威尔逊的认知语境理论,维索尔伦的语言顺应理论以及我国学者刘云泉、林兴仁和熊学亮的动态语境理论的相关知识进行介绍。第五章传统语境观与动态语境观。本章分为五个部分：第一部分,对传统语境研究的基本情况进行回顾,指出传统语境理论的价值及其不足之处；第二部分,分析了动态语境观的研究现状,同时也对该种理论的先进性进行了评点；第三部分,在对两种语境观进行分析和对比的基础上,指出动态语境观正是在传统语境观的基础上不断地发展与完善的,所以二者是互相补充、相辅相成的关系；第四部分,根据以上比较,笔者提出动静相结合的语境研究方法。特别指出：该方法尚无任何实验依据,只是一种设想：第五部分,对本章进行总结。第六章：一门新兴学科——语境学呼之欲出。本章主要分为两个部分,第一部分,对语境学建立的相关背景进行了介绍；第二部分介绍了相关学者对建立语境学必要性的论述及语境学建立的现实性。
[Abstract]:Context, that is, the environment of language communication, prescribes and restricts the content, form and result of verbal communication. For a long time, people have tried to uncover its mysterious veil and made unremitting exploration on the theory of context. This paper summarizes the historical clue and development track of context research, classifies and integrates the previous research results, compares the traditional context view with the dynamic context view, and on this basis, The thesis is divided into six chapters:. The first chapter introduces the concept and importance of context, points out that context is the foundation of language survival, and has close relationship with other disciplines. Thirdly, it analyzes the current situation of contextual research. Finally, it explains the significance of the topic, and hopes to make a deeper, more comprehensive and more essential revelation of the contextual problem through the comprehensive arrangement and the combination of static and dynamic context research methods (the author's humble opinion is that the author has made a deeper, more comprehensive and more essential revelation of the contextual problem. The second chapter introduces the emergence and development of western context theory. Firstly, it briefly introduces the origin and development of context theory in the West, secondly, it introduces Pearce's "index vocabulary" theory in detail. Ma Lin Noowski's "meaning behind meaning" theory, Foss' linguistic context and situational context theory, Halliday's "register theory" and Haimes' analysis of contextual factors, etc. Their contributions and theoretical defects are briefly evaluated. The third chapter is the study of context by modern Chinese scholars. This chapter is the focus of the whole chapter, which is divided into five parts: from the microscopic perspective, the scholars' research results in context are classified, sorted, and classified from the composition, classification and function of context. The author hopes that the above integrated data can provide some help for the future research of scholars. Chapter 4th: dynamic context. Firstly, the dynamic characteristics of context are introduced, and it is pointed out that it is necessary to observe and study context from a dynamic perspective. This paper introduces in detail the cognitive context theory of Spob and Wilson, the linguistic adaptation theory of Withollen, and the relevant knowledge of the dynamic context theory of Liu Yunquan, Lin Xingren and Xiong Xueliang, as well as those of Chinese scholars Liu Yunquan, Lin Xingren and Xiong Xueliang. This chapter is divided into five parts: the first part reviews the basic situation of the study of traditional context, points out the value of the traditional context theory and its shortcomings, the second part, The research status of dynamic context view is analyzed, and the advanced nature of the theory is also evaluated. The third part, on the basis of analyzing and contrasting the two kinds of context view, It is pointed out that the dynamic context view is constantly developed and perfected on the basis of the traditional context view, so the two are complementary and complementary. Part 4th, according to the above comparison, The author puts forward the contextual research method of combining static and static, and points out in particular that this method has no experimental basis, but only a tentative idea: part 5th, this chapter is summarized. Chapter 6th: a new subject, contextual science. This chapter is divided into two parts. The first part introduces the relevant background of the establishment of contextual science; The second part introduces the necessity of the establishment of contextualism and the reality of the establishment of contextualism.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H030

【参考文献】