湖南慈利三合口话量词研究

发布时间：2018-03-22 09:22

本文选题：慈利方言　切入点：三合口话　出处：《河北师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：量词是现代汉语的基本词类之一，，它在口语中的使用频率很高，各方言都有数量可观的量词，且多具有明显特色。本文以湖南省慈利县三合口话量词为研究对象，通过对其分类、构成、用法等方面的描写与分析，反映三合口话量词的基本面貌，并通过与普通话量词的对比分析揭示方言量词的特点。全文共分为五章：第一章是绪论。首先论述本文的选题源起和研究意义，介绍本文的语料来源；其次对汉语量词的研究历史和方言量词的研究现状作简单的梳理和说明；随后介绍慈利县的概况和历史沿革；最后明确三合口话属于西南官话湖广片的湘北小片，并对三合口话的音系进行介绍。第二章是三合口话的量词概貌。第一节对汉语量词历来的分类情况进行大致介绍，并确定三合口话量词的分类方式，即采用名量、动量二分法，每个大类之下再细分不同的小类。第二节和第三节以表格为主要形式逐类介绍三合口话中的名量词和动量词，其中名量词分为个体量词、集合量词、度量衡量词和临时量词四类；动量词分为专职动量词、借用动量词和时间量词三类。第三章是三合口话中的量词变化形式和量词结构。第一节按照构造类型对量词的各种变化形式进行分类描写，说明其在构成、功能、意义和用途上的特点。三合口话量词的变化形式比较丰富，从构造类型上说，可分为重叠式、附加式、重叠附加式、重叠镶嵌式；就各种变化形式所表达的语法意义来说，可表遍量、全量、约量、大量、小量、分量、逐量、满意量；从用途方面来说，有原式还有强调式。第二节对三合口话的量词结构进行介绍。三合口话中的量词结构主要有数量结构、指量结构和疑量结构三大类，其中数量结构比较丰富，共有十种，为叙述方便，从形式和语义两个角度将其分为五组；指量结构有三种；疑量结构有三种，根据提问形式分为两组。第四章是三合口话量词与普通话量词的比较研究。第一节对二者中量词的总体构成情况进行比较，其中三合口话特有的量词44个，三合口话没有的量词105个，三合口话和普通话共有的量词129个。第二节对二者共有的129个量词从搭配上进行比较，有搭配完全一致、搭配不完全一致、搭配完全不一致三种情形。第三节对量词变化形式和量词结构进行比较，三合口话的量词变化形式以及量词结构和普通话相比，形式更丰富，表现力也更强。第五章是结语。结语部分主要是对前文内容进行总结归纳，从而概括出三合口话量词系统的基本面貌和主要特点。
[Abstract]:Classifier is one of the basic parts of speech in modern Chinese, it is used frequently in spoken language, each dialect has a considerable number of quantifiers, and most of them have obvious characteristics. This paper takes the classifier of Sanhe dialect in Cili County, Hunan Province, as the research object. Through the description and analysis of its classification, composition and usage, it reflects the basic features of the classifiers in Sanhe dialect, and reveals the characteristics of the classifiers in dialect through the comparative analysis with the classifiers in Putonghua. The full text is divided into five chapters:. The first chapter is the introduction. Firstly, it discusses the origin and significance of the topic, introduces the source of the corpus of this paper, and then briefly combs the research history of Chinese classifiers and the research status of dialect classifiers. Then it introduces the general situation and historical evolution of Cili County. Finally, it clarifies that Sanhekou dialect belongs to the Hunan small piece of Huguang film in Southwest Mandarin, and introduces the phonological system of Sanhekou dialect. The first section gives a general introduction to the traditional classification of Chinese classifiers, and determines the classification methods of classifiers in Sanhe dialect, that is, nominal quantity and momentum dichotomy. The second and third sections introduce, in the form of tables, nominal quantifiers and momentum words in Sanhe dialect, which are divided into individual classifiers and aggregate quantifiers. There are four categories of metrology and temporary quantifier, and the variable quantifier is divided into three categories: professional momentum word, borrowed momentum word and time classifier. The third chapter is the change form and structure of classifier in Sanhekou dialect. The first section classifies and describes the various forms of classifier according to the structural type, and explains its composition and function. In terms of structural types, they can be divided into reduplication type, additional type, overlapping additional type, overlapping mosaic type; in terms of the grammatical meaning expressed in various changing forms, The quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity, the quantity. The second section introduces the structure of classifiers in Sanhekou dialect. There are three categories of quantifier structure in Sanhekou dialect, including quantitative structure and suspect structure, among which there are ten kinds of quantitative structure. For the convenience of narration, it is divided into five groups from two angles of form and semantics: three kinds of index structure and three kinds of suspect structure, which are divided into two groups according to the form of questioning. The fourth chapter is a comparative study of the classifiers in Sanhe dialect and Putonghua. The first section compares the overall composition of the classifiers in the two languages, including 44 classifiers unique to Sanhe dialect and 105 classifiers that do not exist in Sanhe dialect. There are 129 classifiers shared by Sanhe dialect and Putonghua. In the second section, the comparison of 129 classifiers shared by the two groups shows that the collocation is completely consistent, but the collocation is not completely consistent. The third section compares the change form of classifier and the structure of classifier. The change form of classifier and the structure of classifier in Sanhe dialect are richer in form and stronger in expressiveness than in Putonghua. The fifth chapter is the conclusion. The conclusion part is to summarize the contents of the preceding text, thus generalizing the basic features and main features of the system of classifiers in Sanhe dialect.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H174

【参考文献】