新版《汉语大字典》商补

发布时间：2018-04-08 15:53

本文选题：《汉语大字典》　切入点：新版　出处：《宁波大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：经过十年修订，新版《汉语大字典》已于2010年4月面世。与首版相比较，新版《汉语大字典》大多数方面都有明显的改进和提高。但是，作为一部大型汉语字典，修订工作不可能一劳永逸，新版《汉语大字典》仍然存在着许多不足或疏失。本文在充分肯定新版成绩的基础上，对新版《汉语大字典》提出商榷和补苴，以供再次修订时参考。文章绪论部分对新版《汉语大字典》的出版背景、《汉语大字典》的研究概况以及新版《汉语大字典》的主要成就作了简要介绍，其中介绍新版主要成就从考释僻字、纠正误释、完善释义、调整义项、修改注音、增删例证等六个方面加以举例说明。本论部分是文章的主体，分别从收字、义项、释义、例证、体例、校勘等六个方面对新版《汉语大字典》的讹误和疏漏之处进行讨论。其中义项问题从义项漏略、义例不合、义项当合并三个方面展开，例证问题从缺少例证、例证未溯源两个方面展开。在讨论过程中，，作者立足新版《汉语大字典》文本，广泛参考古今文献资料，借鉴前人研究成果，力求以翔实的材料和严密的论证对所提出的问题进行深入透彻的分析，并提出自己的意见。结论部分针对新版《汉语大字典》存在的不足，提出改进的方法：首先，要重视资料工作，继续广泛地搜集和积累资料；其次，要逐步建立为《汉语大字典》修订工作服务的汉语历时语料库；第三，要加强对近几十年以来特别是改革开放以来产生的新字义的研究和收释工作；第四，需要政府一如既往的重视和投入，并建立保证编辑质量不断提高的工作机制。
[Abstract]:After ten years of revision, the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary was published in April 2010.Compared with the first edition, most aspects of the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary have obvious improvement and improvement.However, as a large Chinese dictionary, the revision work cannot be done once and for all, and there are still many shortcomings or omissions in the new edition of Chinese Dictionary.On the basis of fully affirming the new edition of the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary, this paper puts forward a discussion and a supplement to the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary for reference when it is revised again.In the introduction part, the background of the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary, the general situation of the research and the main achievements of the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary are briefly introduced, in which the main achievements of the new edition are introduced, including the interpretation of rare words and the correction of misinterpretation.Perfect interpretation, adjust meaning, modify phonetic, add and delete examples to illustrate six aspects.This part is the main part of the article, respectively from the word, meaning, interpretation, examples, methods, collation and other six aspects of the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary of errors and omissions are discussed.Among them, the problem of meaning is from three aspects: the missing meaning, the wrong example, the merging of meaning, and the problem of illustration from two aspects: lack of example and untraceability of example.In the course of the discussion, the author, based on the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary, extensively refers to the ancient and modern literature, and draws on the previous research results, and tries to make a thorough and thorough analysis of the problems raised with full and solid materials and rigorous argumentation.And put forward their own opinions.Conclusion in view of the shortcomings of the new edition of the Chinese Dictionary, this paper puts forward some improved methods: first, we should pay attention to the data work, and continue to collect and accumulate the data extensively; secondly,It is necessary to gradually establish a Chinese diachronic corpus for the revision of the Chinese Dictionary; third, to strengthen the research and interpretation of the new meanings produced in recent decades, especially since the reform and opening up; and fourth,The government should pay more attention and input, and establish the working mechanism to guarantee the quality of editors.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H163

【共引文献】